Skip to main content

Gender Mainstreaming, Diversity Management and Inclusive Excellence: From Similarities and Differences to New Possibilities

  • Chapter
GenderChange in Academia

Abstract

During the past 20 years various policy initiatives and organizational strategies to improve the representation of women and reduce inequalities in higher education have emerged in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). There are currently three prevailing strategies for bringing about equality: 1) Gender mainstreaming in the EU public non-profit sector, 2) diversity management in the EU and US for-profit sectors, and 3) inclusive excellence in the nonprofit subsector of US higher education. From a feminist perspective much more is needed to improve the status of women in higher education as well as to become more inclusive to individuals whose ethnicity/race, sexual orientation, age, religion or beliefs, disability, or nationality may differ from those the dominant group. Despite the increasing complexity and importance of equality strategies and the large bodies of literature associated with the first two strategies, there is limited research comparing their attributes (e.g., Bendl 2004), and the third strategy has yet to be critically analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belinszki, E./Hansen, K./Müller, U. (2003): Diversity Management. Best Practices im internationalen Feld. München: LIT Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendl, R. (2004): Gendermanagement und Gender und Diversitätsmanagement: Ein Vergleich der verschiedenen Ansätze. In: Bendl, R. et. al. (2004): Interdisziplinäres Gender und Diversitätsmanagement. Einführung in Theorie und Praxis. Linde International, Vienna,43-72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendl, R./Hanappi-Egger, E./Hofmann, R. (Eds.) (2004): Interdisziplinäres Gender- und Diversitätsmanagament. Einführung in Theorie und Praxis. Vienna, Austria: Linde Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendl, R./Fleischmann, A./Hofmann, R. (in press): Queer theory and diversity management. Reading codes of conduct from a queer perspective. In: Journal of Management and Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2004): The diversity scorecard: A learning approach to institutional change. In: Change. 36(1): 2004: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (n.d.): Gender Mainstreaming. Retrieved on July 1, 2009 from: http://www.coe.int/T/E/Human%5FRights/Equality/02_GenderMainstreaming

  • Cox, T. (1991): The multicultural organization. In: Academy of Management Executive. 5. 34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Danowitz Sagaria, M. (2007): Women, universities and change: Gender equality in the European Union and the United States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Danowitz, M./Hanappi-Egger, E./Hofmann R. (in press): Managing gender and diversity in organizations. In: L. Zsolnai, L. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dass, P./Parker, B. (1999): Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning. In: Academy of Management Executive 13(2). 68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Carmen Triana, M. (2009): Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. In: Journal of Management Studies. 46(5): 755–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R./Meyerson, D. (2000): Theories of gender in organization: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. In: Research in Organizational Behaviour. 22: 103–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005): Geschäftsnutzen von Vielfalt. Bewährte Verfahren am Arbeitsplatz. Generaldirektion Beschäftigung, soziale Angelegenheiten und Chancengleichheit. Referat D3. Author. Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008): Continuing the Diversity Journey. Business practices, perspectives and benefits. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit G. 4. Author. Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Exworthy, M./Halford, S. (1999): Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (2007): Framing equality: The politics of race, class, gender in the US, Germany, and the expanding European Union. Retrieved April 20, 2009 from http://eucenter.wisc.edu/publications/eubook-13%20ferreeoror.pdf.

  • Fischer, F./Forester, J. (Eds.) (1997): The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974): Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grutter et. al. v. Bollinger et. al (2003): 539 U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P./Dey, E./Hurtado, S./Gurin, G. (2002): Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. In: Harvard Educational Review. 72(3). 2002. 330–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, E./Pollack, M. (2002): Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 7(3). 2002. 432–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson; S. E. (Ed.) (1992): Diversity at the working place: Human resource initiatives. New York: Guilford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S. (2007): Linking diversity with the educational and civic missions of higher education. In: Review of Higher Education. 30(2). 2007. 185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadritzke, U: (Ed.) (1997): „Unternehmenskulturen unter Druck“ Neue Managementkonzepte zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Edition Sigma

    Google Scholar 

  • Koall, I./Bruchhagen, V./Höher, F. (2002): Vielfalt statt Lei(d)tkultur. Managing Gender and Diversity. Munich, Germany: LIT Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Krell, G. (1997): Mono-oder multikulturelle Organisationen? „Managing Diversity“ auf dem Prüfstand. In: Kadritzke, U. et. al. (1997): 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuser, M./Neusüß C. (Eds.) (2004) Gender Mainstreaming. Konzepte – Handlungsfelder – Instrumente. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung

    Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J./Chang, M./Antonio, A. (2005): Making Diversity Work: A research based perspective. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (2005): Has Gender Mainstreaming failed? In: International Feminist Journal of Politics. 7(4): 576–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M./Schön, D. (1993): Framing in policy discourse. In: F. Fischer/Forester (1997): 144–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockridge Institute (2007): Frames and framing. Retrieved on April 17, 2009 from http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/aboutus/frames-and-framing/index.html.

  • She Figures (2009): Retrieved on June 2, 2009 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/sciencesociety/document_library/pdf_06/preliminary-results-of-she-figures-2009_en.pdf

  • Squires, J. (2005): Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorising mainstreaming in the context of diversity and deliberation in: Social Politics 12(3): 366–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R. (1992): Managing diversity: a conceptual framework. In: Jackson; S. E. (1992): 306–318

    Google Scholar 

  • US-Census Bureau (2004): US Interim projections by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/natprojtab01a.pdf

  • Verloo, M. (2001): Another velvet revolution? Gender mainstreaming and policies of implementation. IWM Working Paper No. 5/2001. Vienna: Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M./Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: Introducing a critical frame analysis approach. In: M. Verloo (2007): 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2007): Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2005): Comparative gender mainstreaming. In: International Feminist Journal of Politics. 7(4): 453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D./Berger, J./McClendon, S. (2005): Toward a Model of Inclusive Excellence in Postsecondary Institutions. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2004): Gender Mainstreaming als Instrument zur Innovation von Institutionen. In: Meuser, M./Neusüß C. (2004): 86–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai, L. (Ed.) (forthcoming): The Future International Manager. London: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Birgit Riegraf Brigitte Aulenbacher Edit Kirsch-Auwärter Ursula Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danowitz, M.A., Bendl, R. (2010). Gender Mainstreaming, Diversity Management and Inclusive Excellence: From Similarities and Differences to New Possibilities. In: Riegraf, B., Aulenbacher, B., Kirsch-Auwärter, E., Müller, U. (eds) GenderChange in Academia. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92501-1_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics