Skip to main content

Opposition Parties, Electoral Incentives and the Control of Government Ministers: Parliamentary Questioning in Norway

  • Chapter
Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler

Abstract

The Norwegian political system is parliamentary, meaning that the government is selected by the parliament (Storting) and that the government in its day-to-day proceedings needs to be tolerated by the majority of the legislators to remain in power.1 The main instrument for legislators to substantiate parliamentarism is the vote of censure: If a no-confidence motion receives a simple majority of votes, the government is constitutionally obliged to resign. In practice, however, the mere expectation of such an event often is sufficient for governmental change.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aardal, Bernt, 2002: Electoral Systems in Norway. In: Bernard Grofman/ Arend Lijphart (Hrsg.), The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberbach, Joel, 1990: Keeping a Watchful Eye. The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter, David, 1984: The Nordic Parliaments. A Comparative Analysis. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Bruce/ John Ferejohn/ Morris Fiorina, 1987: The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, John M./Matthew S. Shugart, 1995: Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. In: Electoral Studies 14(4), 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, Erik, 1994: Parliamentary Questions and Control in Denmark. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, Herbert, 1995: Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda. In: Herbert Döring (Hrsg.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, Herbert, 1996: Parlamentarische Kontrolle in Westeuropa: Strukturen, Probleme und Perspektiven. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B27(96), 42–55..

    Google Scholar 

  • Forretningsordenen (Rules of Procedure), http://www.stortinget.no/info/foretbt.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helander, Voitto, 1991: The Interpellation Procedure in the Nordic Countries. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), The Political Life of Institutions. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, Leif/ Björn Erik Rasch, 1998: Stortingets fagkomiteer: Forholdet mellom popularitet, arbeidsmengde og komitestørrelse. In: Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift A, 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, Ludger, 2006: The Changing Parameters of Political Control in Western Europe. In: Parliamentary Affairs 59, 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, Gudmund, 1971: Interest, Influence, and Cooperation: A Study of the Norwegian Parliament. PhD Dissertation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, Stein/ Lars Svåsand, 1984: Spørreordningene og politiske profiler i Stortinget 1977—1981. In: Ole Berg/ Aarild Underdal (Hrsg.), Fra valgtil vedtak. Oslo: Aschehoug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, Ingvar, 1994: Parliamentary Questions in the Swedish Riksdag. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, Ingvar/Kaare Strøm, 1995: Parliamentary Committees. In: Herbert Döring (Hrsg.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 249–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David, 1974: Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, James L., 1991: Elections and Government Spending. In: Public Choice 70, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, Bjorn Erik, 1994: Question Time in the Norwegian Storting — Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetvedt, Hilmar, 1998: Norwegian Parliamentary Committees: Performance, Structural Change, and External Relation. In: Lawrence D. Longley/ Roger H. Davidson (Hrsg.), The New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skard, Torild, 1980: Utvalgt til Stortinget. Oslo: Gyldenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, 1990a: A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. In: American Journal of Political Science 34(2), 565–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, 1990b: Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svåsand, Lars/Kaare Strøm/Björn E. Rasch, 1997: Change and Adaptation in Party Organization. In: Kaare Strøm/ Lars Svåsand (Hrsg.), Challanges to Political Parties: The Case of Norway. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michelle M., 1992: Formal versus Informal Incentive Structures and Legislative Behavior: Evidence from Costa Rica. In: Journal of Politics (54), 1055–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valen, Henry, 1988: Norway: Decentralization and Group Representation. In: Michael Gallagher/ Michael Marsh (Hrsg.), Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiberg, Matti, 1994: To Keep the Government on Its Toes: Behavioural Trends of Parliamentary Questioning in Finland 1945-1990. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiberg, Matti, 1995: Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? In: Herbert Döring (Hrsg.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Steffen Ganghof Christoph Hönnige Christian Stecker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rasch, B.E. (2009). Opposition Parties, Electoral Incentives and the Control of Government Ministers: Parliamentary Questioning in Norway. In: Ganghof, S., Hönnige, C., Stecker, C. (eds) Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91773-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91773-3_13

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15297-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91773-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics