Skip to main content

Parliamentary Organisational Design for Governmental Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies: The Case of Sweden

  • Chapter
Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler
  • 2273 Accesses

Abstract

Even if it is the core idea of democracy, making governments accountable will always be difficult to accomplish in practice also in well established democracies. Voters are supposed to make their governments accountable for actions and results and vote for a new government if they fail. Yet, it is for various reasons difficult for the citizens to obtain the crucial information about governmental activities and to analyze and evaluate the information they get from e.g. the mass media. Voters may also think they sit with a pour hand. There might be long time before the next elections occur and accountability can be claimed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, 2001: The Challenge for Parliament: Making Government Accountable. London: Vacher Dod Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helander, Voitto/Guy-Erik Isaksson, 1994: Interpellations in Finland. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. Roderick/Mathew D. McCubbins, 1991: The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, Arthur, 2003: Delegation and its Perils. In: Kaare Strøm et al. (Hrsg.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 707–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, Ingvar, 1994: Parliamentary Questions in the Swedish Riksdag. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, Ingvar, 2005: Vad gör partierna i staten? In: Gissur Ó Erlingsson et al. (Hrsg.), Politiska partier. Lund: Studentlitteratu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Wofgang C./Torbjörn Bergman/ Kaare Strøm, 2003: Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems. In: Kaare Strøm et al. (Hrsg.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Wolfgang C., 2000: Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work. In: European Journal of Political Research 37(3), 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Philip, 2005: Parliament in British Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, Bjørn-Erik, 2005: Electoral Incentives to Control Government Ministers. Questions from Individual Members of the Norwegian Parliament. NOPSA meeting. Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, Bjorn Erik, 1994: Question Time in the Norwegian Storting — Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. In: Matti Wiberg (Hrsg.), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries. Forms of Questioning and Behavioral Trends. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, Eric, 1989: Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, 1990: A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. In: American Journal of political Science 34(2), 565–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, 2003: Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation. In: Kaare Strøm et al. (Hrsg.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiberg, Matti, 1995: Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? In: Herbert Döring (Hrsg.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, Diana, 1994: Ministers and Parliament. Accountability in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Steffen Ganghof Christoph Hönnige Christian Stecker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mattson, I. (2009). Parliamentary Organisational Design for Governmental Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies: The Case of Sweden. In: Ganghof, S., Hönnige, C., Stecker, C. (eds) Parlamente, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91773-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91773-3_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15297-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91773-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics