Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Jugendkriminalität und der „punitive turn“ im U. S.-amerikanischen Jugendkriminalrecht

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Jugendkriminalität

Zusammenfassung

Schon seit der Antike stellt sich die komplexe Frage, wie der Staat auf Straftaten Jugendlicher reagieren soll. In den Vereinigten Staaten war die Antwort auf diese zentrale gesellschaftliche Frage seit 1825, als in New York mit der ersten eigenständigen Haftanstalt nur für delinquente Jugendliche der erste Schritt auf dem Weg zu einer jugendadäquateren Gestaltung des Prozesses der strafrechtlichen Sozialkontrolle in dieser besonderen Altersgruppe erfolgte, von progressiven Fortschritten geprägt.

Ausführlich zur Entwicklung der Behandlung junger Straftäter in den Vereinigten Staaten von der Kolonialzeit bis ins 21. Jahrhundert, siehe Schaerff 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Acton, R. B. (1996). Gubernatorial initiatives and rhetoric of juvenile justice reform. Journal of Law and Policy 5, 277 – 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. M., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Frazier, C. E. (2002). Juvenile transfer to criminal court study: Final report. Department of Juvenile Justice. Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 86, 10 – 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (2000). Factors contributing to the ups and downs of youth violence. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonczar, T. P. (2011). National corrections reporting program, 2009: Most serious offense of state prisoners, by offense, admission type, age, sex, race, and hispanic origin (1993 – 2009). U. S. Department of Justice. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1986 – 2011). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1984 – 2010. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2012 – 2015). Prisoners in 2011 – 2014. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2014). Arrest data analysis tool. Offense by age. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=datool&surl=/arrests/index.cfm. Zugegriffen: 15. 12. 2016.

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2015). Jail inmates at midyear 2014. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census (2000). U. S. Population Estimates by age, sex, race, and hispanic origin: 1980 to 1999. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2010). 2010 Juvenile justice outcome evaluation report. Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for Youth Justice (2007). Jailing juveniles. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for Youth Justice (2011). State Trends. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J., & Laub, J. H. (1998). The unprecedented epidemic in youth violence. Crime and Justice 24, 27 – 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitch, M. (2009). From time out to hard time. Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaware Office of the Budget (2003). Juvenile recidivism: 1994 – 2003 juvenile level III, IV and V recidivism study. Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J. (1995). Arresting ideas. Policy Review (Fall) 74, 12 – 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, L., & Schiraldi, V. (2001). Off balance. Building Blocks for Youth. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, L., Woodruff, K., Chavez, V., & Wallack, L. (1997). Youth and violence on local television news in California. American Journal of Public Health 87, 1311 – 1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014 – 2016). Crime in the United States, 2012 – 2015. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics (2016). BEH5 Youth perpetrators of serious violent crimes: Rate and number of serious violent crimes by youth ages 12 – 17, 1980 – 2014. http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/beh5.asp. Zugegriffen: 15. 12. 2016

  • Feld, B. C. (1999). The transformation of the juvenile court – Part II. Minnesota Law Review 84, 327 – 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (2002). 2002 Outcome evaluation report. Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A. (1996). Trends in juvenile violence. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J. (2008). The death penalty. In N. Persily, J. Citrin & P. J. Egan (Hrsg.), Public opinion and constitutional controversy (S. 429 – 507). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawaii Department of the Attorney General (2001). Incarcerated juveniles and recidivism in Hawai’i. Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson, R. (2009). Crime and Expected Punishment: Changes in Perceptions at the Age of Criminal Majority. American Law and Economics Review 11, 209 – 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. C. (2009). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, H. (1991). Judicial rotation in juvenile and family courts. Juvenile and Family Court Journal 42, 13 – 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. L., & Metsger, L. K. (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime. Crime & Delinquency 40, 96 – 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B., Hartney, C., Wolf, A., & Silva, S. (2009). Youth violence myths and realities. National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Oakland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U. S. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, 163 – 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. (1995). The Massachusetts juvenile justice system of the 1990s. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 21, 339 – 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Office of Youth Development (2003). Profile of recidivism in office of youth development. Baton Rouge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1994). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics – 1993. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1995). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics – 1994. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1996). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics – 1995. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., Pastore, A. L., & Flanagan, T. J. (1993). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics – 1992. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrus, E. (2003). Best interests equals zealous advocacy. Maryland Law Review 62, 288 – 360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Department of Juvenile Justice (2000). Recidivism rates for youths released in FY 1997 by major programs for one, two, and three years after release. Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., Hay, C., Gertz, M., & Mancini, C. (2007). Public opinion and the foundation of the juvenile court. Criminology 45, 223 – 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, R. (2011). No place for kids. Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures (2015). Trends in Juvenile Justice State Legislation 2011 – 2015. Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2013). Reforming juvenile justice. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (1999). Factors contributing to recidivism among youth placed with the New York State Division for Youth. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. (2005). The rest of their Lives. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. (2009). The rest of their Lives – May 2009 Update. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100, 765 – 823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzzanchera, C., Sladky, A., & Kang, W. (2016). Easy access to juvenile populations: 1990 – 2015. http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop. Zugegriffen: 15. 12. 2016

  • Rand, M. R., & Rennison, C. M. (2002). True crime stories? Chance 15, 47 – 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, R. E. (2010). Juvenile transfer laws. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossum, R. A. (1995). Holding juveniles accountable. Pepperdine Law Review 22, 907 – 930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaerff, M. (2015). Die Behandlung junger Straftäter in den USA. Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (1997). The risks juveniles face when they are incarcerated with adults. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. M., Guo, S., & Krebs, J. J. (1992). Public attitudes toward juvenile crime and juvenile justice. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 13, 241 – 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 National report. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National report. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National report. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M., Poe-Yamagata, E. (1996). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1996 update on violence. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, M. (1996). Juvenile justice in the next century: Programs or Politics? Criminal Justice (Winter) 10, 27 – 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, M. (2001). Public Opinion on Youth, Crime and Race. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, V. L. (2005). The juvenile death penalty today. Ada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, D., & Drizin, S. A. (2002). „Owing to the extreme youth of the accused. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 92, 641 – 705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbet, P., Gable, R., & Hurst, H. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996 – 97 Update. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J., & Waul, M. 2002. Reflections on the Crime Decline: Lessons for the Future? Urban Institute. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1995). Crime and public policy. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (S. 429 – 507). San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. C. (2003). Justice by any other name. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 12, 275 – 305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Münster, Deutschland

    Marcus Schaerff

Authors
  1. Marcus Schaerff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Schaerff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät 2, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Bernd Dollinger

  2. Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Henning Schmidt-Semisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaerff, M. (2018). Jugendkriminalität und der „punitive turn“ im U. S.-amerikanischen Jugendkriminalrecht. In: Dollinger, B., Schmidt-Semisch, H. (eds) Handbuch Jugendkriminalität. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19953-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19953-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19952-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19953-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation