Skip to main content

The Concept of Bildung and Its Moral Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Becoming oneself

Abstract

Nowadays it has become somehow fashionable to use the German term Bildung in international educationalist and philosophical discourses that are predominantly English-speaking. A reason for that development could be the continuously growing awareness that there are some important aspects of human development and of pedagogical interactions which cannot be properly and precisely grasped by the English term “education”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Løvlie and Stanish (2002, p. 320).

  2. 2.

    Biesta (2002, pp. 380, 386–387, 388, 390).

  3. 3.

    Biesta (2002, p. 388).

  4. 4.

    see ibid., p. 389.

  5. 5.

    Rorty (2009, p. 360).

  6. 6.

    ibid., p. 360.

  7. 7.

    von Humboldt (1980, 235 f.).

  8. 8.

    see ibid., p. 235.

  9. 9.

    ibid., p. 237.

  10. 10.

    see von Humboldt (1905, pp. 27–33).

  11. 11.

    see ibid.

  12. 12.

    see Hegel (1821/2009, p. 163).

  13. 13.

    see Hegel (1807/1980, pp. 264–266).

  14. 14.

    see Hegel (1807/1980, p. 266; 1821/2009, 162 f.).

  15. 15.

    I first developed the following interpretation of Brandom’s theory of conceptual articulation in my article “Intersubjective Recognition and the Development of Propositional Thinking” (Stojanov 2007)

  16. 16.

    see Tugendhat (2003, pp. 15–17; 2003, pp. 19–21).

  17. 17.

    see Brandom (1994, pp. xiv; 159–172).

  18. 18.

    See Brandom (1994, pp. 183, 188, 496–497).

  19. 19.

    Brandom (1994, p. 509).

  20. 20.

    Brandom (1994, p. 590).

  21. 21.

    Brandom (1994, p. 590).

  22. 22.

    McDowell (1996, p. 84)

  23. 23.

    See Peters (1966, pp. 49, 55).

  24. 24.

    Peters (1966, p. 59).

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 210.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., p. 210.

  27. 27.

    Albert Ilien describes the first type of teachers as “The Stuff-Transmitter”, and the second one—as “The Students’-Friend” (see Ilien 2005, pp. 94–105, pp. 164–185).

  28. 28.

    See Honneth (2010, 110 f).

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 110 f.

References

  • Biesta G (2002) How general can Bildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal. J Philos Educ 36(3):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandom RB (1994) Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel GWF (1807/1980) Phänomenologie des Geistes. In: Bonsiepen W, Heede R (eds) Gesammelte Werke, Bd 9. Meiner, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel GWF (1821/2009) Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. In: Grotsch K, Weisser-Lohmann E (eds) Gesammelte Werke, Bd 14,1. Meiner, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A (2010) Anerkennung als Ideologie. Zum Zusammenhang von Moral und Macht. In: Honneth A Das Ich im Wir. Studien zur Anerkennungstheorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 103–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilien A (2005) Lehrerprofession. Grundprobleme pädagogischen Handelns. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvlie L, Standish P (2002) Introduction: bildung and the idea of a liberal education. J Philos Educ 36(3):317–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell JH (1996) Mind and world: with a new introduction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RS (1966) Ethics and education. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (2009) Philosophy and the mirror of nature, 30. anniversary ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanov K (2007) Intersubjective recognition and the development of propositional thinking. J Philos Educ 41(1):75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat E (2003) Egozentrizität und Mystik. Eine anthropologische Studie. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • von Humboldt W (1980) Theorie der Bildung des Menschen. In: Flitner A, Giel K (eds) Wilhelm von Humboldt. Werke in fünf Bänden, Bd 1. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, pp 234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • von Humboldt W (1822/1905) Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung. In: Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed) Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften, Bd 4. B. Behr’s (photomechanischer Nachdruck de Gruyter & Co. Berlin 1968), Berlin, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krassimir Stojanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stojanov, K. (2012). The Concept of Bildung and Its Moral Implications. In: Schneider, K. (eds) Becoming oneself. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19156-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19156-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18635-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19156-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics