Skip to main content

Challenges for Evidence-based Policy in European Education and Training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Vocational Education and Training in a Changing World

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, in the UK where many critics argued in the past that policy decisions were too often driven by inertia or by short-term political pressures which led to Modernising Government activities at the end of the 1990’s and the beginning of the 2000’s.

  2. 2.

    Cedefop is the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. It supports the development of VET and evidence-based policy making by providing advice, research, analysis, information, and stimulates European cooperation and common learning.

  3. 3.

    See the following documents: The Bordeaux Communiqué on Enhanced European cooperation in vocational education and training (2008); Council of the European Union (2008); Council of the European Union (2009).

  4. 4.

    ReferNet is Cedefop’s network of reference and expertise on vocational education and training. Each national ReferNet member is backed by a consortium of VET related organisations. ReferNet Members provide Cedefop with information on VET developments in their country.

  5. 5.

    Barnett-Page and Thomas (2009) show an increasing number of methods for synthesising qualitative research have emerged recently, originating mostly from health-related research. A number of methodological and conceptual links between these methods were identified and explored, while contrasting epistemological positions explained differences in approaches to issues such as quality assessment and extent of iteration.

  6. 6.

    Monitoring in the future implies increased use of the Internet as a data source and statistics, as eServices. From cloud computing the technological development might well enable soon cloud statistics (Sioli and Skaliotis, 2011).

  7. 7.

    This label should be reserved for those figures which fulfil the requirements of the European Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Model-driven calculations and normative objectives, such as political targets or valuations, do not fall under this category. This difference should be clearly made in communication.

  8. 8.

    An interesting research issue in this context that goes beyond this paper would be to investigate further in how far it is possible to disentangle evidence-based policy from policy-based evidence (Godin, 2010).

Bibliography

  • Barnett-Page, E. and Thomas J. 2009.Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 9, No. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. J. and Howlett, M.1992. The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change, Policy Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 275–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. 2007. Why ‘what works’ won’t work: evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research, Educational Theory, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and Schuller, T. 2007. The evidence agenda. Evidence in Education: Linking research and policy. Paris, OECD, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedefop. 2009. Consolidation, continuity and change. Towards a European era of vocational education and training. Thessaloniki, Cedefop. (Cedefop Reference series, 73.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedefop. 2010. A bridge to the future. European policy for vocational education and training 2002–10. Thessaloniki, Cedefop.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bordeaux Communiqué on Enhanced European cooperation in vocational education and training. 2008. Communiqué of the European Ministers for Vocational Education and Training, the European social partners and the European Commission to review the priorities and strategies of the Copenhagen process. Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. and Gorard, S. 2007. What Counts and What Should Count as Evidence. Evidence in Education. Linking research and policy. Paris, OECD, pp. 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakroun, B. 2008. What can we learn from policy learning. Yearbook 2008. Policy Learning in Action. Turin, ETF Communication Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2008. Council conclusions on the future priorities for enhanced European cooperation in vocational education and training (VET). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2009. Council conclusions on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, T. 2010. Reviewing European VET policy. Challenges for comparative research. P. Grollmann, and M. Hoppe (eds.). Methods and instruments for the evaluation and monitoring of VET-systems. Conference proceedings, BIBB Discussion papers nr. 119 Bonn, pp. 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETF. 2008. Yearbook 2008. Policy Learning in Action. Turin, ETF Communication Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. 2001. Making Evidence-Based Practice Educational, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 555–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2011. Commission staff working document. Progress towards common European objectives in education and training. Indicators and benchmarks – 2010/2011. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010a. Bruges Communiqué on enhanced cooperation in VET for the period 2011–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010b. Communication Europe 2020: a strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2009. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the production method of EU statistics: a vision for the next decade. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. Towards more knowledge-based policy and practice in education and training. Brussels. (Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 1098.)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, JRC/IPSC. 2010. Indicators for Lisbon post-2010 – business as usual? Luxembourg. (Scientific and Technical Research Series.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. 2005. European Statistics Code of Practice. Adopted by the Statistical Programme Committee on 24 February 2005 and promulgated in the Commission recommendation of 25 May 2005 on the independence, integrity and accountability of the national and community statistical authorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. 2010. The Culture of numbers. From science to innovation. INRS, Montreal, Canada. (Communication presented to the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR) US National Academy of Sciences, Washington 21 May 2010.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. and Taylor, C. 2004. Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research. London, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D. 2007. Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. J. Furlong and A. Oancera (eds), Applied and Practice-based Research. Special Edition of Research Papers In Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 213–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 275–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High Level Group. 2004. Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment. (Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipinska, P., Schmid, E. and Tessaring, M. 2007. Zooming in on 2010. Reassessing vocational education and training. Thessaloniki, Cedefop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. 2002. Research evidence, knowledge management and educational practice: lessons for all? Oxford.(Paper for High-level Forum on Knowledge Management in Education and Learning 18–19 March 2002.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, K. and Philips, D. 2004. Processes of Educational Borrowing in Historical Contexts. D. Philips and K. Ochs (eds), Educational Policy Borrowing: Historical Perspectives. Oxford, Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Evidence in Education. Linking research and policy. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD and EU JRC. 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. 1992. Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 331–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolovska, M. and Vos, A. 2008. ETF peer learning: From policy learning to policy change in partner countries. ETF Yearbook 2008: Policy Learning in Action. Turin, ETF Communication Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. 2003. ‘The Europeanisation of public policy’. K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanisation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raffe D. and Spours, K. (eds). 2007. Policy-making and policy learning in 14–19 education. London, Bedford Way Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sioli, L. and Skaliotis, M. 2011. Unveiling Europe’s Digital Ambitions through Official Statistics: Past, Present and Future. (Paper for the conference Statistics for policymaking: Europe 2020, Brussels, 10–11 March 2011.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, L. 1991. Dimensional analysis: notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. D.R. Maines (ed.), Social organisation and social process: essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. New York, Aldine, pp. 303–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. 2003. ‘Is It ‘What Works’ that Matters? Evaluation and Evidence-Based Policy Making,’ Research Papers in Education, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 331–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. 2002. ‘Distinguished Lecture’ of the American Educational Research Association, annual meeting 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessaring, M. and Wannan, J. 2004. Vocational education and training. key to the future Lisbon-Copenhagen-Maastricht: mobilising for 2010. Thessaloniki, Cedefop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. 2005. What is evidence? (A paper for ESRC TLRP series ‘Quality in Educational Research’, Leeds, April 2005) based on Thomas. 2004. Introduction. G. Thomas and R. Pring (eds), Evidence-based Practice in Education. Maidenhead, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Dunkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunkel, T. (2012). Challenges for Evidence-based Policy in European Education and Training. In: Pilz, M. (eds) The Future of Vocational Education and Training in a Changing World. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18757-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18757-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18527-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18757-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics