Skip to main content
  • 304 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O., Brethower, D. M., Hluchyj, T., and Nowakowski, J. R. (1983). Program evaluation: A practitioner’s guide for trainers and educators. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., and Reichardt, C. S. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Morris, L. L. (1987). How to design a program evaluation. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit (2’d ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, B. (1982). On participant observation as a component of evaluation: Strategies, constraints, and issues. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5 (3), 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. S. (1988). Evaluative decisions under conflicting constraints. Evaluation Practice, 9 (2), 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. R. (1992). Evaluating school programs. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M. C. (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8 (1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., and Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1992). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R. (Ed.). (1973). School evaluation: The politics and process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin, M., & Solomon, L. C. (1983). Conducting benefit cost analysis of program evaluation. In M. Alkin and L. C. Solomon (Eds.), The costs of evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1983). Cost-effectiveness: A primer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteau, P. (1987). Establishing corporate evaluation policy: Cost versus benefit. In L. S. May, C. A. Moore, and S. J. Zammit (Eds.), Evaluating business and industry training. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, B. R., and Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

James R. Sanders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanders, J.R. (2000). Durchführbarkeitsstandards. In: Sanders, J.R. (eds) Handbuch der Evaluationsstandards. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93234-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93234-1_4

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-2766-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-93234-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics