Skip to main content

Einstein’s Treatment of Theoretical Concepts

  • Chapter
Albert Einstein

Abstract

In all realms of nature science has repeatedly been confronted with the problem of introducing theoretical concepts which do not deal with observable entities for a coherent description of phenomena. In view of this situation there have always been two methodological procedures which are clearly reflected in the principles of theory construction. One method starts at the level of the phenomena and extrapolates into those fields that are not accessible empirically. This method tries to do as much as possible without theoretical constructs, i.e. without predicates and relations which have no direct correlates in experience. If theoretical constructs cannot be avoided, one tries to introduce them as auxiliary concepts without semantic reference, which serve but as syntactic intermediaries between terms of empirical meaning. Opposed to this is the other strategy which uses without hesitation terms that refer to non-perceptible entities. According to this method the linguistic reference is justified if results of logical deductions have been validated in the field of experience. In this case it is stated that the reference of the theoretical term to the hidden object has been validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Einstein: Autobiographical Notes, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, 2nd edition, New York, 1951, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein: Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Warme geforderten Bewegungen von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Ann. Phys. 17 (1905), p. 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. G. Brush: A History of Random Processes I. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 5 (1969), p. 35. idem: Mach and Atomism Synthese 18, 213 (1968), p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Planck: Zur Theorie des Gesetzes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum, in: Dokumente der Naturwissenschaft, ed. by A. Hermann, vol. 12, Stuttgart, 1969, p. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. B. Kanitscheider: Die Philosophic der modernen Physik, Section II: Sprache und Erkenntnis, Darmstadt, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jon Dorling: Einstein’s Introduction of Photons. Argument by Analogy or Deduction from the Phenomena, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 22 (1971), p. 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin J. Klein: Einstein’s First Paper on Quanta, The Natural Philosopher 2 (1963), p. 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Einstein: Zum gegenwartigen Stand des Strahlungsproblems, Phys. Zs. 10 (1909), p. 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Planck: Die Gesetze der Warmestrahlung und die Hypothese der elementaren Wirkungsquanten, in: idem: Die Theorie der Strahlung und der Quanten, Halle, 1913, p. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Born / W. Biem. Dualismus in der Quantentheorie, Phil. Nat. 10, 4 (1968), p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Einstein: Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper, in: idem: Das Relativitatsprinzip, Darmstadt, 1974, p. 26. — Exact historical analyses have proved that it was not the Michelson experiment which played the decisive heuristic role but that Einstein thought at the phenomenon of the aberration and Fresnel’s ether-drag hypothesis.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. G. Holton: Einstein, Michelson and the ‘Crucial Experiment’, Isis 60 (1969), p. 133–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Reichenbach: The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): Albert Einstein, 1. c, p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Tornebohm: Aspects of the Special Theory of Relativity, in: E. Laszlo and E. B. Sellon (eds.): Vistas in Physical Reality, New York, 1976, p. 31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. R. Popper: Intellectual Autobiography, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle (III), 1974, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Carnap: Intellectual Autobiography, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle (III), 1963, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Carnap: Testability and Meaning, Phil. Sci. 3, 4 (1936), p. 419–471; 4, 1 (1937), p. 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Carnap: Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 1, 3, Chicago, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Maxwell: The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities, Minnesota Studies, vol. III, 1962, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Carnap: Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology, Revue Int. Phil. (Brussels) 4, 11 (1950), p. 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Feigl: Existential Hypothesis, Phil. Sci. 17 (1950), p. 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Holton: Einstein, Mach and the Search for Reality, Daedalus 97 (1968), p. 636–673.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Einstein: Theory of the affine field, Nature 112 (1923), p. 448–449. Cf. also his contribution to “Theorie de la relativite”. Soc. franc, phil Bull. 22 (1923), p. 111ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Einstein: Bermerkungen zu Bertrand Russels Erkenntnis-Theorie, in: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, La Salle (III), 1971, p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. P. Ramsay. Foundations of Mathematics, 2nd edition, London, 1978, p. 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Craig: Replacement of Auxiliary Expressions, Phil. Rev. 65 (1956), p. 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. G. Hempel: The Theoretician’s Dilemma, Minnesota Stud. Phil. Sci., vol. II, Minneapolis, 1958, p. 37–98

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Maxwell: The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities, Minnesota Stud. Phil. Sci., vol. III, Minneapolis, 1962, p. 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. J. C. Smart: Between Science and Philosophy, New York, 1968, p. 145. (We follow here Smart’s line of thought.)

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Einstein: Physik und Realitat, Journal of the Franklin Institute 221, 3 (1936), p. 313–347, esp. § 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Einstein / B. Podolsky / N. Rosen: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47 (1935), p. 777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. R. Popper: Quantum Mechanics without the observer, in: M. Bunge (ed.): Quantum Mechanics and Reality, New York, 1967; M. Bunge: Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Ludwig: Zur Deutung der Beobachtung in der Quantenmechanik, in: L. Krüger (ed.): Erkenntnisprobleme der Naturwissenschaft, Cologne, 1970, p. 428–434.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Einstein: Über den gegenwartigen Stand der Feldtheorie. Festschrift für Aurel Stodola, Zürich, 1929, p. 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Peter C. Aichelburg Roman U. Sexl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kanitscheider, B. (1979). Einstein’s Treatment of Theoretical Concepts. In: Aichelburg, P.C., Sexl, R.U. (eds) Albert Einstein. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91080-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91080-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-528-08425-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-91080-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics