Skip to main content

Production Scheduling in Sublevel Caving Method with the Objective of NPV Maximization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2018

Abstract

Production scheduling optimization is one of the main issues that have a significant effect on the mine economics. Production scheduling optimization in underground mines, has received less attention than in surface mines, and it is still a manual process and in most cases, achieving the truly optimal result through manual scheduling is impossible due to the complexity of the scheduling problem. Caving methods compared with other underground mining methods are low-cost methods and have high production rates. Sublevel caving is one of the main underground mining methods for hard rock mining and there are limited studies about its long-term production scheduling. In this paper, an integer linear programming (IP) model with the objective of net present value (NPV) maximization is developed for production scheduling that is suited for sublevel caving method. The model contains acceptable technical and operational constraints. This model is formulated two-dimensionally (2D) and it can optimize production schedule in thin-layer deposits. In this research, MATLAB programming platform was used to capture the IP model framework. The model was applied on a real block model and the maximum NPV is determined. With respect to determining maximum NPV, it is recommended that the mine development should be determined based on the optimal mining sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ataee-pour, M.: A critical survey of the existing stope layout optimization techniques. J. Min. Sci. 41(5), 447–466 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, X., Marcotte, D., Simon, R.: A heuristic sublevel stope optimizer with multiple raises. J. Southern African Inst. Mining Metall. 114, 427–434 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alford, C.: Optimization in underground mine design. APCOM 25, 213–218 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shenavar, M., Ataee-pour, M., Rahmanpour, M.: Evaluating mineable reserve in presence of grade uncertainty using floating stope optimizer in underground mines. In: 6th International Conference on Computer Applications in the Minerals Industries (CAMI), Turkey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pourrahimian, Y.: Mathematical programming for sequence optimization in block cave mining. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Edmonton, Alberta (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, J.K., Smith, L., Wells, P.M.: Planning of underground copper mining. In: 10th International Application Symposium on the Application of Computer in the Mineral Industrial (APCOM), Johannesburg, South Africa, pp. 251–254 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gillenwater, E.L.: An integrated model for production planning and scheduling in underground coal mining. Doctor of Business dissertation, University of Kentucky (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Subhash, C., Sarin, J., Hansen W.: The long-term mine production scheduling problem. J. IIE Trans. 37(2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chanda, E.K.C.: An application of integer programming and simulation to production planning for a strati form ore body. Mining Sci. Tech. 11(2), 165–172 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jawed, M.: Optimal production planning in underground coal mines through goal programming: a case study from an Indian mine. In: Elbrond, J., Tang, X., (eds.) Proceeding of 24th International Application of Computer and Operation Research in the Mineral Industry, (APCOM) Symposium, CIM, Montréal, pp. 44–50 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winkler, B.: System for quality oriented mine production planning with MOLP. In: Proceeding of 27th International Application of Computer and Operation Research in the Mineral Industry, (APCOM) Symposium, Royal School of Mines, London, pp. 53–59 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Topal, E.: Advanced underground mine scheduling using mixed integer programming. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rahal, D., Smith, M., Van G., Hout, A., Johannides, V.: The use of mixed integer linear programming for long-term scheduling in block caving mines. In: Camisani-Calzolari, F. (ed.) Proceeding of 31st International Application of Computer and Operation Research in the Mineral Industry, (APCOM) Symposium, SAIMM, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 123–131 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubio, E., Diering, E.: Block cave production planning using operation research tools. In: Karzulovic, A., Alfaro, M. (eds.) Proceeding of MassMines in Chile, pp. 141–149 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuchta, M., Newman, A., Topal, E.: Implementing a production schedule at LKAB’s Kiruna Mine. Interfaces 34(2), 124–134 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, A., Kuchta, M.: Using aggregation to optimize long-term production planning at an underground mine. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2), 1205–1218 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlyle, W.M., Eaves, B.C.: Underground planning at stillwater mining company. Interfaces 31(4), 50–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McIsaac, G.: Long-term planning of an underground mine using mixed-integer linear programming. CIM Bull. 98(1089), 1–6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fava, L., Saavedra-Rosas, J., Tough, V., Haarala, P.: Heuristic optimization of scheduling scenarios for achieving strategic mine planning targets. In: The 23rd World Mining Congress, Canada (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Sullivan, D., Newman, A.: Optimization-based heuristics for underground mine scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241(1), 248–259 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magda, R.: Mathematical model for estimating the economic effectiveness of production process in coal panels and an example of its practical application. Internat. J. Prod. Econom. 34(1), 47–55 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitchurch, K., Cram, A.A., Ozawa, N., Koizumf, K.: Underground and open-cut coal scheduling using expert systems. In: 26th APCOM Proceedings, pp. 339–346 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein, R., Gaete, S., Caro, F., Weintraub, A., Santibañez, P., Catalan, J.: Optimizing long term planning for underground copper mines. In: Proceeding of Copper 2003-Cobre 2003, 5th International Conference, Santiago, Chile, CIM and the Chilean Institute of Mining, vol. 1, pp. 265–279 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schulze, M., Zimmermann, J.: Scheduling in the context of underground mining. In: Operations Research Proceedings (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Shenavar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shenavar, M., Ataee-pour, M., Rahmanpour, M. (2019). Production Scheduling in Sublevel Caving Method with the Objective of NPV Maximization. In: Widzyk-Capehart, E., Hekmat, A., Singhal, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99220-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics