Abstract
The geological block model is used as the basis for the grade-tonnage curves and subsequent financial models. On some narrow tabular gold deposits, these blocks are observed to be significantly smaller than the smallest block that can be selectively mined. The effect of this on the financial model is not clear. This paper explores how differences in the mining block sizes affect the financial model. Monte Carlo simulation is used to create a series of hypothetical, narrow tabular gold deposit databases with a range of average grades at either side of the assumed cut-off grade. EXCEL, as well as Leapfrog Geo, software is utilised to create geological block models with a range of sizes. Grade-tonnage curves are created for each model and the assumed cut-off grade is applied to determine the resultant tonnes and average mining grade above cut-off grade. Financial models created by these are compared to determine how critical it is to have the mining block model dimensions similar to the smallest selective mining unit. It is shown that there has to be a broad similarity in the dimensions of the blocks used for planning purposes and publishing grade-tonnage curves and financial projections when considering the EXCEL model. This trend is, however, not observed when considering the grade-tonnage curves created from the Leapfrog Geo generated model. This model is considered to be a more reliable approximation of how grades are extrapolated into blocks and show how the theoretical EXCEL generated model has a higher resolution than is realistically possible when considering sample spacing. The financial outlook for the hypothetical mines can also be altered by changing the mining method to change the selectivity of the ore body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
SRK Consulting: Block Modelling [Online]. Available: https://www.srk.ru.com/en/block-modelling (2018)
Ronald, E.: Rules of Thumb for Geological Modeling—SRK presentation at SME 2018 [Online]. Available: www.na.srk.com/en/na-rules-thumb-geological-modeling (2018)
Hartman, H.L., Britton, S.G., Gentry, D.W., Karmis, M., Mutmansky, J.M., Schlitt, W.J., Singh, M.M.: SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 2nd edn. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Littleton, United States (1992)
Birch, C.: New systems for geological modelling-black box or best practice? J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 114(12), 993–1000 (2014)
Annels, A.E.: Mineral Deposit Evaluation. A Practical Approach. Chapman & Hall, Cardiff (2012)
Stone, J.G., Dunn, P.G. Ore Reserve Estimates in the Real World, 2nd edn. Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication Number 3, Littleton, United States (2002)
Matomane, O. The Effect of Changing Block Sizes on Grade-Tonnage Curves, Unpublished BSc (Eng) Final Year Report, Johannesburg, (2017)
SAMCODE: The South African Mineral Codes, July 2009 [Online]. Available: http://samcode.co.za/downloads/SAMREC2009.pdf (2013)
Savant, R.: Overview of Mining Costs—CPM Group 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.goldconvention.in/iigc2012/presentation/CPM%20Group%20Overview%20of%20Mining%20Costs%20RS.pdf (2018)
Poxleitner, G.: Operating Costs for Mines—SRK Consulting (Canada) [Online]. Available: https://www.srk.com/sites/default/files/file/GPoxleitner_OperatingCostEstimationForMiners_2016.pdf (2018)
Hall, B.: Cut-off Grades and Optimising the Strategic Mine Plan, Spectrum Series, 20 edn. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton Victoria, Australia (2014)
Border, S.: Optimisation of Cut-off Grades During Design of Underground Mines. Sydney (1991)
Smith, G.L., Pearson-Taylor, J., Anderson, D.C., Marsh, A.M.: Project valuation, capital investment and strategic alignment—tools and techniques at Anglo Platinum. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 107, 67–74 (2007)
Lane, K.F.: The Economic Definition of Ore. Mining Journal Books Limited, London (1988)
Minnitt, R.: Cut-off grade determination for the maximum value of a small Wits-type gold mining operation. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 277–283 (2004)
Krige, D., Assibey-Bonsu, W.: Use of direct and indirect distributions of selective mining units for estimation of recoverable resource/reserves for new mining projects. In: APCOM ‘99 Symposium (1999)
Birch, C.: Impact of the South African mineral resource royalty on cut-off grades for narrow, tabular Witwatersrand gold deposits. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 116, 237–246 (2016)
Birch, C.: Optimization of cut-off grades considering grade uncertainty in narrow, tabular gold deposits. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 117(2), 149–156 (2017)
Marques, D., Costa, J.: Analysis of the dispersion variance using geostatistical simulation and blending piles. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 118(8), 599–604 (2014)
Minnitt, R.: Sampling: the impact on costs and decision making. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 107(7), 451–462 (2007)
Spragg, K.: Leapfrog Interpolation Basics, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://blog.leapfrog3d.com/2013/05/08/leapfrog-interpolation-basics/ (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Birch, C. (2019). Optimisation of Mining Block Size for Narrow Tabular Gold Deposits. In: Widzyk-Capehart, E., Hekmat, A., Singhal, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99220-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99220-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99219-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99220-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)