Abstract
The rational way to reconstruct acetabular bone defects in revision surgery is to use the most biological way possible to restore and improve the bone stock through bone grafts, which will also form a solid foundation for further revisions, especially in young patients. This rationale has led us to apply impacting bone grafting with a cemented cup in many patients. This is a reliable technique for the treatment of large acetabular defects. However, proximal and medial migration of the cemented cup has been reported in some cases in all series. It could be due to a some difference in bone remodelling when cemented fixation is used in conjunction with bone impaction grafting. When a graft is well incorporated and the cup fails for mechanical reasons, the incorporation of the earlier graft should improve the bone stock situation and facilitate subsequent revisions. Consequently, we also recommend the use of impaction bone grafting in complex acetabular revision surgery to facilitate future revisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Colo E, Rijnen WH-C, Schreurs BW. The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup. Hip Int. 2015;25(4):361–7.
von Roth P, Abdel MP, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise followup, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(4):284–7.
Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(4):504–9.
Lee JM, Nam HT. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(7):1057–60.
Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Kvist J, Lindholm A, Ojersjö A, Ivarsson I. Acetabular revision with extensive allograft impaction and uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Results after 9 (7–11) years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(8):1083–91.
Mohaddes M, Herberts P, Malchau, Johanson P-E, Kärrholm J. High proximal migration in cemented acetabular revisions operated with bone impaction grafting; 47 revision cups followed with RSA for 17 years. Hip Int. 2017;27(3):251–8.
Schreurs BW, Keurentjes JC, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20- to 25-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(9):1148–53.
Schmitz MWJL, Hannink G, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJJH, Schreurs BW. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-greafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than 50 years of age. A concise follo-up, at 27 to 35 years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(19):1440–6.
Schreurs BW, Luttjeboer J, Thien TM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Buma P, Veth RPH, Slooff TJJH. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A concise followup, at eight to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(3):646–51.
Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(10):2482–90.
Van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FGM, Wuisman PIJM. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.
Ornstein E, Franzén H, Johnsson R, Stefánsdóttir A, Sundberg M, Tägil M. Five-year follow-up of socket movements and loosening after revision with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. A radiostereometric and radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:975–84.
Buma P, Lamerigts N, Schreurs BW, Gardeniers J, Verslayen D, Slooff TJJH. Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision. Histological evaluation in 8 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:536–40.
Tägil M, Aspenberg P. Fibrous tissue armoring increases the mechanical strength of an impacted bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(1):78–82.
Waddell BS, Boettner F, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Favorable early results of impaction bone grafting with reinforcement mesh for the treatment of Paprosky 3B acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:919–23.
Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3304–13.
Schimmel JW, Buma P, Versleyen D, Huiskes R, Slooff TJJH. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous allografts in cemented hip arthroplasty: A histologic and biomechanical study on the goat. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:438–48.
Slooff TJ, Schimmel JW, Buma P. Cemented fixation with bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:667–77.
Comba F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year followup study of 142 aseptic revisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:865–9.
Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Pedersen DR. A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusion acetabuli. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:495–9.
Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33–44.
García-Rey E, Madero R, García-Cimbrelo E. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durfor medial but not lateral acetabular defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3882–91.
Borland WS, Bhattacharya R, Holland JP, Brewster NT. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss. Early to medium-trem results. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(4):347–52.
Gehrke T, Bangert Y, Schwantes B, Gebauer M, Kendoff D. Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting. Hip Int. 2013;23:359–65.
Gill K, Wilson MJ, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ. Results using trabecular metal augments in combination with acetabular impaction bone grafting in deficient acetabula. Hip Int. 2013;23(6):522–8.
Schreurs BW, te Stroet MAJ, Rijnen WHC, Gardeniers JWM. Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions. Hip Int. 2015;25(1):44–9.
Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1059–65.
Schreurs BW, Slooff THHJ, Gardeniers JWM, Buma P. Acetabular reconsruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup. 20 years’ of experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:202–15.
Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA. Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(3):419–22.
Shinar AA, Harris WH. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(2):159–68.
van Egmond N, De Kam DC, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):562–73.
Bolder SB, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, van Unen JM, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ. Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cups: human cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(6):652–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Rey, E., García-Cimbrelo, E. (2019). Biological Repair of Acetabular Bone Defects and Cup Migration After Impaction Bone Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: García-Rey, E., García-Cimbrelo, E. (eds) Acetabular Revision Surgery in Major Bone Defects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98596-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98596-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98595-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98596-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)