Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Total Hip Replacement Revision Using a Dual Mobility Cup Cemented into a Metallic Ring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Acetabular Revision Surgery in Major Bone Defects

  • 591 Accesses

Abstract

The number of patients undergoing THA is constantly increasing. This trend is reported worldwide and results from multiple factors, including the progresses made in the field of hip surgery, the quality of the functional results, the increasing patient life span, the higher functional demand, and the enlargement of THA indications to younger patients and older patients as well. Consequently, the number of patients undergoing THA revision also increased significantly with time [4, 18, 19, 32]. For Kurtz et al. [18, 19], the total number of procedures in the United States from 2009 to 2010 increased by 6.0% for primary total hip arthroplasty, and 10.8% for revision total hip arthroplasty. The number of THA will increase from 174% in 2030, and the number of THA revision will double in 2026. In the same way, Bozic et al. [4], reported an increase of THA revision by 23% between 2005 and 2010 in the US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ. Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:265–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Gicquel P, Lefebre Y, Kempf JF. Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001;87(2):135–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, Di Iorio A, Philippot R, Farizon F. Long term wear of dual mobility total hip replacement cups: explant study. Int Orthop. 2018;42(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Chan V, Vail TP, Rubash H, Berry DJ. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens Than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen FS, Di Cesare PE, Kale AA, Lee JF, Frnakel VH, Stuchin SA, et al. Results of cemented metal-backed acetabular components. A 10-year-average follow-up study. J Arthroplast. 1998;13:867–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Nistri L, Innocenti M. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3542–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(ASuppl1):18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebramzadeh E, Beaulé PE, Culwell JL, Amstutz HC. Fixation strength of an all-metal acetabular component cemented into an acetabular shell: a biomechanical analysis. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser GA, Wroblewski BM. Revision of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducible dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63B:552–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaudin G, Ferreira A, Gaillard R, Prudhon JL, Caton JH, Lustig S. Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: in vitro study. Int Orthop. 2017;41(3):521–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Béjui-Hugues J. Use of a dual-mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:465–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haen TX, Lonjon G, Vandenbussche E. Can cemented dual mobility cup be used without a reinforcement device in cases of mild acetabular bone stock alteration in total hip arthroplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101:923–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation: 228 patients from the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):566–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F. The use of a cemented dual-mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2010;468:3248–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jo S, Jimenez Almonte JH, Sierra RJ. The Cumulative Risk of Re-dislocation After Revision THA Performed for Instability Increases Close to 35% at 15 years. J Arthroplast. 2015 Jul;30(7):1177–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2000;378:155–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United states from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtz S, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):624–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lange JK, Spiro SK, Westrich GH. Utilizing dual mobility components for first-time revision total hip arthroplasty for instability. J Arthroplast. 2018 Feb;33(2):505–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Langlais F, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O. Dual-mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lebeau N, Bayle M, Belhaouane R, Chelli M, Havet E, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(5):679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M. Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual-mobility socket. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2004;90:249–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabrion M, Mertl P. Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:8–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lübbeke RC, Barea C, Köhnlein W, Hoffmeyer P. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years or older. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:1041–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Massin P, Besnier L. Acetabular revision using a press-fit dual-mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI. The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(suppl 1):86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pattyn C, Audenaert E. Early complications after revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual-mobility socket and reinforcement ring. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:357–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peraldi P, Vandenbussche E, Augereau B. Bad clinical results of cemented cups with metal-backed acetabular components. 124 cases with 21 months follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop. 1997;83:561–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot FX, Curvale G, et al. Post-prosthetic dislocation prevention in total hip revision surgery using a dual-mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Prudhon JL, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M, Delaunay C, Verdier R. SoFCOT: Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty: matched case-control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty-four implants. Int Orthop. 2017;41(3):455–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ravi B, Croxford R, Reichmann WM, Losina E, Katz JN, Hawker GA. The changing demographics of total joint arthroplasty recipients in the United States and Ontario from 2001 to 2007. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):637–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Regis SA, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:1057–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual-mobility. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:807–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, Gautier E. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years. J Arthroplast. 2000;15:959–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, Carret JP, Béjui-Hugues J, Guyen O. Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wegrzyn J, Thoreson AR, Guyen O, Lewallen DG, An KN. Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(6):991–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lariboisière Teaching Hospital, Paris, France

    Pascal Bizot

  2. Laboratoire Bioingénierie et Bioimagerie ostéo-articulaire (B20A) CNRS UMR7052, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France

    Pascal Bizot

Authors
  1. Pascal Bizot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Bizot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

    Eduardo García-Rey

  2. Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

    Eduardo García-Cimbrelo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bizot, P. (2019). Total Hip Replacement Revision Using a Dual Mobility Cup Cemented into a Metallic Ring. In: García-Rey, E., García-Cimbrelo, E. (eds) Acetabular Revision Surgery in Major Bone Defects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98596-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98596-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98596-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation