Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medical Imaging Safety in Global Health Radiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radiology in Global Health

Abstract

Attention to matters of safety is important in any imaging facility. In the context of low- and middle-income countries, limited resources may complicate the attempt to set up and operate an imaging facility with the highest standards of safety, but it is important to see that all applicable safety measures are nonetheless carried out. Imaging safety involves several general principles, including the need to minimize radiation exposure consistent with answering the clinical question at hand. Safety considerations relevant to patients, staff, and the general public must be addressed. Considerations specific to individual modalities include appropriate limitations on exposure in x-ray and CT imaging, attention to magnetic field hazards in magnetic resonance imaging, proper preparation and control of radionuclides in nuclear medicine, and avoidance of excessive prenatal imaging procedures with ultrasound. An important general safety consideration for all imaging modalities is assuring proper clinical utilization, which includes factors such as not performing imaging procedures without medical referral and supervision, attention to image quality to ensure procedures are not repeated unnecessarily, and carefully considering the clinical appropriateness of any requested imaging procedure. Training and credentialing of staff is of utmost importance, and includes staff who design, prepare, and evaluate a new imaging facility as well as medical staff who acquire, order, or review images. Ensuring imaging safety requires the input of a team of experts, including trained and qualified medical physicists, health physicists, radiation safety officers, clinical safety personnel, installation and service personnel, radiologic technologists, and radiologists. With appropriate attention to safety, diagnostic imaging is a useful component of healthcare services in resource-limited regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bogdonavich W. Radiation overdoses point up dangers of CT scans [Internet]. New York Times. 2009 Oct 15 [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/us/16radiation.html.

  2. Clark C. CA governor signs radiation overdose bill into law [Internet]. HealthLeaders Media. 2010 Oct 1 [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/page-3/QUA-257182/CA-Governor-Signs-Radiation-Overdose-Bill-into-Law.

  3. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010;254:326–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NCRP. Report number 160: ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA. Has pediatric CT at Children’s hospitals reached its peak? Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1194–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP. National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology. 2011;258:164–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Menoch MJA, Hirsh DA, Khan NS. Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e690–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:700–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_2008_Annex_A.pdf. p. 25, last accessed 25 Aug 2017.

  10. Wildman-Tobriner B, Strauss K. Bhargavan-Chatfield, et al. using the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry to evaluate practice patterns and radiation dose estimates of pediatric body CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(3):641–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ, Applegate KE, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc. 2001;165:458–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/8649/Justification-of-Medical-Exposure-in-Diagnostic-Imaging. Last accessed 25 Aug 2017.

  13. Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Applegate K, et al. IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:623–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathews J, Forsythe A, Brady Z. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, et al. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:2354–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krille L, Dreger S, Schindel R, et al. Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015;54:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Journy N, Rehel J-L, Ducou Le Pointe H. Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication: elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:185–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boice JD. Radiation epidemiology and recent paediatric computed tomography studies. Annals ICRP. 2015;44:236–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NCRP. Report number 147: structural shielding design for medical X-ray imaging facilities. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dobbins JT III. Image quality metrics for digital systems. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J, Kundel H, editors. Handbook of medical imaging, vol. 1. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ranger NT, Samei E, Dobbins JT III, Ravin CE. Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods. Radiology. 2007;243:785–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samei E, Bisset GS III, Ranger NT, Lo JY, Dobbins JT III, Maxfield C, et al. Image quality and dose in digital radiography. RSNA/AAPM educational module. RSNA Publications; Oak Brook, Chicago, IL. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT III, Ravin CE. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital chest radiography systems. Physics Med Biol. 2011;56:5099–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011;258:889–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs VR, Sox HC. Physicians’ views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff. 2001;20:30–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, Bosma J, Casarella WJ, Erickson BA, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 2010;257:240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frush DP. Categorical course in physics: radiation dose and image quality for pediatric CT: clinical considerations. Radiolog Soc North Am. 2006:167–82.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC, Bulas D, Frush DP, Butler P, et al. Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:868–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nievelstein RAJ, van Dam I, van der Molen A. Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1324–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marin D, Nelson RC, Rubin GD, Schindera ST. Body CT: technical advances for improving safety. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frush DP. Chapter 26. MDCT in children: scan techniques and contrast issues. In: Kalra MK, Saini S, Rubin GD, editors. MDCT: from protocols to practice. Milan: Springer; 2008. p. 333–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. American College of Radiology. ACR manual on contrast media, Version 8 [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/FullManual.pdf.

  34. Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Jan SC. Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to IV nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1643–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paulson EK, Weaver C, Ho LM, Martin L, Li J, Darsie J, Frush DP. Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:151–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim S, Frush DP, Yoshizumi TT. Bismuth shielding in CT: support for use in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1739–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current. Med Phys. 2011;38:6084–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW, et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1447–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf9/p090013a.pdf.

  40. Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety, implants and devices: 2012 Edition (620+ pages; ISBN-10, 0-9746410-8-1; ISBN-13, 978-0-9746410-8-9).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Orenstein BW. Gadolinium on the brain: curiosity or cause for concern? Radiol Today. 2016;17:20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  42. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine/National Electrical Manufacturer’s Association. Acoustic output measurement standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Laurel: AIUM Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:451–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2007. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. Available from: http://www.aium.org/publications/clinical/obstetric.pdf.

  45. Lin YC, Dong SL, Yeh YH, Wu YS, Lan GY, Liu CM, Chu TC. Emergency management and infection control in a radiology department during an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:606–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Orenstein BW. MRI and MRSA? — infection control in the imaging room. Radiol Today. 2008;9(21):14.

    Google Scholar 

  47. The Joint Commission. National patient safety goals 2011-12 [Internet]. 2011 Aug 4 [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/2011-2012_npsg_presentation_final_8-4-11.pdf.

  48. Delaney LR, Gunderman LR. Hand hygiene. Radiology. 2008;246:15–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ott LK, Hoffman LA, Hravnak M. Intrahospital transport to the radiology department: risk for adverse events, nursing surveillance, utilization of a MET and practice implications. J Radiol Nurs. 2011;30(2):49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Frush DP, Frush KS. The ALARA concept in pediatric imaging: building bridges between radiology and emergency medicine: consensus conference on imaging safety and quality for children in the emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(Suppl 4):S629–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. American College of Radiology [Internet]. Radiology safety. [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Radiology-Safety/.

  52. International Atomic Energy Agency [Internet]. Radiation protection of patients. [cited 2012 Jul]. Available from: https://rpop.iaea.org/RPoP/RPoP/Content/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Duke Kunshan University Programs, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Radiology, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    James T. Dobbins III

  2. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Donald P. Frush & James R. MacFall

  3. Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Donald P. Frush, James R. MacFall, Robert E. Reiman Jr & Gregg E. Trahey

  4. Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Christopher J. N. Kigongo

  5. Radiation Safety Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Robert E. Reiman Jr

  6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Gregg E. Trahey & David P. Bradway

Authors
  1. James T. Dobbins III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald P. Frush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher J. N. Kigongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James R. MacFall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert E. Reiman Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gregg E. Trahey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David P. Bradway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James T. Dobbins III .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RAD-AID International, Chevy Chase, MD, USA

    Daniel J. Mollura

  2. RAD-AID International, Chevy Chase, MD, USA

    Melissa P. Culp

  3. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Matthew P. Lungren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dobbins, J.T. et al. (2019). Medical Imaging Safety in Global Health Radiology. In: Mollura, D., Culp, M., Lungren, M. (eds) Radiology in Global Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98485-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98485-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98485-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation