Skip to main content

Corneal Cross Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in the Management of Keratoconus

Abstract

Keratoconus in pediatric patients is in most cases underdiagnosed when compared to adults. This probably is due to the acceptable visual function that early stages of keratoconus permit, which does not influence activities of daily life; a condition not evident neither by the patient nor by the patients’ environment (parents, guardians, teachers etc). The major concern of keratoconus in this age group comprises of the accelerated progression the disease may demonstrate (corneal tissue more biomechanically vulnerable in young patients), with these patients having a sevenfold higher risk of requiring corneal grafting in the future. The introduction of corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) in clinical practice more than a decade ago, changed the management of keratoconus. This treatment approach has decreased the need for corneal transplantations and in some cases improves visual function due to the corneal flattening and surface regularization it achieves. Thereby early diagnosis and appropriate treatment is paramount especially in pediatric patients, while the current literature supports the efficacy of CXL in halting or delaying keratoconus progression in pediatric patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis LJ, Schechtman KB, Wilson BS, et al. Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, et al. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2014;28:189–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leoni-Mesplie S, Mortemousque B, Touboul D, et al. Scalability and severity of keratoconus in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kymionis GD, Grentzelos MA, Liakopoulos DA, et al. Long-term follow-up of corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus—the cretan study. Cornea. 2014;33:1071–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reeves SW, Stinnett S, Adelman RA, et al. Risk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;4:607–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunes A, Tok L, Tok Ö, Seyrek L. The youngest patient with bilateral keratoconus secondary to chronic persistent eye rubbing. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5–6):454–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shehadeh MM, Diakonis VF, Jalil SA, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus among a palestinian tertiary student population. Open Ophthalmol J. 2015;9:172–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Shahroud. Cornea. 2013;32:1441–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saini JS, SarohaV, Singh P, et al. Keratoconus in Asian eyes at a tertiary eye care facility. Clin Exp Optom. 2004;87:97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:753–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soeters N, Van der Valk R, Tahzib NG. Corneal crosslinking for treatment of progressive keratoconus in various age groups. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:454–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zotta PG, Moschou KA, Diakonis VF, et al. Cornealcollagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in pediatricpatients: a feasibility study. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:793–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arora R, Gupta D, Goyal JL, et al. Results ofcorneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:759–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinciguerra P, Alb’e E, Frueh BE, et al. Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients youngerthan 18 yearswith documented progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wollensak G, Iomdina E. Biomechanical and histological changes after cornealcrosslinking with and without epithelial debridement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(3):540–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanna R, Berkwitz E, Castillo E, et al. Collagen cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus in pediatric patients. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2015;4(3):94–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Panos GD, Kozeis N, Balidis M, et al. Collagen cross- linkingfor paediatric keratoconus. Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Jul 31;11:211–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. El Rami H, Chelala E, Dirani A, et al. An Update on the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:257927.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kankariya VP, Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, et al. Management of pediatrickeratoconus - evolving role of corneal collagen cross-linking: an update. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;61(8):435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Magli A, Forte R, Tortori A, et al. Epithelium-offcorneal collagen cross-linking versus transepithelial cross-linking for pediatrickeratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(5):597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, et al. Long term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:585–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barbara R, Pikkel J, Garzozi H, et al. Collagen cross-linking and keratoconus in pediatric patients. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bakshi E, Barkana Y, Goldich Y, et al. Corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in children: our experience. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakshi E, Barequet IS, Aizenman I, et al. Corneal crosslinking in patients younger than 18 years: Long-term follow up in three Israeli medical centers. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2014;3(2):84–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Malik NS, Moss SJ, Ahmed N, et al. Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1138:222–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kymionis GD, Tsoulnaras KI, Grentzelos MA, et al. Topography-based keratoconus regression. Cornea. 2013;32(10):1402–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:769–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shetty R, Nagaraja H, Jayadev C et al. Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients: two-year follow-up results. Biomed Res Int. 2014;894095.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, K. Cankaya I, et al. Accelerated corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus: 24-month outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2014;12:843–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Waszczykowska A, Jurowski P. Two-year accelerated corneal cross-linking outcome in patients with progressive keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:769–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ozgurhan EB, Akcay BIS, Yildirim Y et al. Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line after two different protocols of accelerated corneal collagencross-linking procedures using anterior segment opticalcoherence tomography and confocal microscopy. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:5 pages.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mrochen M. Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):428–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cınar Y, Cingü AK, Türkcü FM, et al. Comparison of accelerated and conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2014;33(3):218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abdelmassih Y, El-Khoury S, Dirani A, et al. Safety and efficacy of sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation and cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abozaid MA. Sequential Keraring implantation and corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2017;11:1891–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diakonis, V.F., Shehadeh, M. (2019). Corneal Cross Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus. In: Barbara, A. (eds) Controversies in the Management of Keratoconus . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98032-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98032-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98031-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98032-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics