Abstract
Keratoconus in pediatric patients is in most cases underdiagnosed when compared to adults. This probably is due to the acceptable visual function that early stages of keratoconus permit, which does not influence activities of daily life; a condition not evident neither by the patient nor by the patients’ environment (parents, guardians, teachers etc). The major concern of keratoconus in this age group comprises of the accelerated progression the disease may demonstrate (corneal tissue more biomechanically vulnerable in young patients), with these patients having a sevenfold higher risk of requiring corneal grafting in the future. The introduction of corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) in clinical practice more than a decade ago, changed the management of keratoconus. This treatment approach has decreased the need for corneal transplantations and in some cases improves visual function due to the corneal flattening and surface regularization it achieves. Thereby early diagnosis and appropriate treatment is paramount especially in pediatric patients, while the current literature supports the efficacy of CXL in halting or delaying keratoconus progression in pediatric patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319.
Davis LJ, Schechtman KB, Wilson BS, et al. Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):489–500.
Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, et al. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2014;28:189–95.
Leoni-Mesplie S, Mortemousque B, Touboul D, et al. Scalability and severity of keratoconus in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:56–62.
Kymionis GD, Grentzelos MA, Liakopoulos DA, et al. Long-term follow-up of corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus—the cretan study. Cornea. 2014;33:1071–9.
Reeves SW, Stinnett S, Adelman RA, et al. Risk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;4:607–11.
Gunes A, Tok L, Tok Ö, Seyrek L. The youngest patient with bilateral keratoconus secondary to chronic persistent eye rubbing. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5–6):454–6.
Shehadeh MM, Diakonis VF, Jalil SA, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus among a palestinian tertiary student population. Open Ophthalmol J. 2015;9:172–6.
Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Shahroud. Cornea. 2013;32:1441–5.
Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.
Saini JS, SarohaV, Singh P, et al. Keratoconus in Asian eyes at a tertiary eye care facility. Clin Exp Optom. 2004;87:97–101.
Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:753–8.
Soeters N, Van der Valk R, Tahzib NG. Corneal crosslinking for treatment of progressive keratoconus in various age groups. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:454–60.
Zotta PG, Moschou KA, Diakonis VF, et al. Cornealcollagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in pediatricpatients: a feasibility study. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:793–6.
Arora R, Gupta D, Goyal JL, et al. Results ofcorneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:759–62.
Vinciguerra P, Alb’e E, Frueh BE, et al. Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients youngerthan 18 yearswith documented progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:520–6.
Wollensak G, Iomdina E. Biomechanical and histological changes after cornealcrosslinking with and without epithelial debridement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(3):540–6.
Hanna R, Berkwitz E, Castillo E, et al. Collagen cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus in pediatric patients. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2015;4(3):94–9.
Panos GD, Kozeis N, Balidis M, et al. Collagen cross- linkingfor paediatric keratoconus. Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Jul 31;11:211–6.
El Rami H, Chelala E, Dirani A, et al. An Update on the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:257927.
Kankariya VP, Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, et al. Management of pediatrickeratoconus - evolving role of corneal collagen cross-linking: an update. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;61(8):435–40.
Magli A, Forte R, Tortori A, et al. Epithelium-offcorneal collagen cross-linking versus transepithelial cross-linking for pediatrickeratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(5):597–601.
Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, et al. Long term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:585–93.
Barbara R, Pikkel J, Garzozi H, et al. Collagen cross-linking and keratoconus in pediatric patients. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):57–60.
Bakshi E, Barkana Y, Goldich Y, et al. Corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in children: our experience. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):53–6.
Bakshi E, Barequet IS, Aizenman I, et al. Corneal crosslinking in patients younger than 18 years: Long-term follow up in three Israeli medical centers. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. 2014;3(2):84–7.
Malik NS, Moss SJ, Ahmed N, et al. Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1138:222–8.
Kymionis GD, Tsoulnaras KI, Grentzelos MA, et al. Topography-based keratoconus regression. Cornea. 2013;32(10):1402–6.
Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:769–75.
Shetty R, Nagaraja H, Jayadev C et al. Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients: two-year follow-up results. Biomed Res Int. 2014;894095.
Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, K. Cankaya I, et al. Accelerated corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus: 24-month outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2014;12:843–9.
Waszczykowska A, Jurowski P. Two-year accelerated corneal cross-linking outcome in patients with progressive keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015.
Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:769–75.
Ozgurhan EB, Akcay BIS, Yildirim Y et al. Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line after two different protocols of accelerated corneal collagencross-linking procedures using anterior segment opticalcoherence tomography and confocal microscopy. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:5 pages.
Mrochen M. Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):428–9.
Cınar Y, Cingü AK, Türkcü FM, et al. Comparison of accelerated and conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2014;33(3):218–22.
Abdelmassih Y, El-Khoury S, Dirani A, et al. Safety and efficacy of sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation and cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:51–7.
Abozaid MA. Sequential Keraring implantation and corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2017;11:1891–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diakonis, V.F., Shehadeh, M. (2019). Corneal Cross Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus. In: Barbara, A. (eds) Controversies in the Management of Keratoconus . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98032-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98032-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98031-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98032-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)