Skip to main content

Student Acceptance of Online Assessment with e-Authentication in the UK

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology Enhanced Assessment (TEA 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 829))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It has been suggested that the amount of plagiarism and cheating in high-stakes assessment has increased with the introduction of e-assessments (QAA 2016), which means that authenticating student identity and authorship is increasingly important for online distance higher education. This study focuses on the implementation and use in the UK of an adaptive trust-based e-assessment system known as TeSLA (An Adaptive Trust-based e-Assessment System for Learning) currently being developed by an EU-funded project involving 18 partners across 13 countries. TeSLA combines biometric instruments, textual analysis instruments and security instruments. The investigation reported in this paper examines the attitudes and experiences of UK students who used the TeSLA instruments. In particular, it considers whether the students found the e-authentication assessment to be a practical, secure and reliable alternative to traditional proctored exams. Data includes pre- and post- questionnaires completed by more than 300 students of The Open University, who engaged with the TeSLA keystroke analysis and anti-plagiarism software. The findings suggest a broadly positive acceptance of these e-authentication technologies. However, based on statistical implicative analysis, there were important differences in the students’ responses between genders, between age groups and between students with different amounts of previous e-assessment experiences. For example, men were less concerned about providing personal data than women; middle-aged participants (41 to 50 years old) were more aware of the nuances of cheating and plagiarism; while younger students (up to 30 years old) were more likely to reject e-authentication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. QAA: Plagiarism in Higher Education - Custom essay writing services: an exploration and next steps for the UK higher education sector (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bermingham, V., Watson, S., Jones, M.: Plagiarism in UK law schools: is there a postcode lottery? Assess. Eval. HE 35(1), 1–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harmon, O.R., Lambrinos, J.: Are online exams an invitation to cheat? J. Econ. Educ. 39(2), 116–125 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Underwood, J., Szabo, A.: Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 34(4), 467–477 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chew, E., Ding, S.L., Rowell, G.: Changing attitudes in learning and assessment: cast-off ‘plagiarism detection’ and cast-on self-service assessment for learning. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 52(5), 454–463 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitelock, D.: Activating assessment for learning: are we on the way with Web 2.0? In: Lee, M.J.W., McLoughlin, C. (eds.) Web 2.0-Based-E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching, pp. 319–342. IGI Global (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Okada, A., Mendonca, M., Scott, P.: Effective web videoconferencing for proctoring online oral exams: a case study at scale in Brazil. Open Prax. – Int. J. OECD 7(3), 227–242 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edling, R.J.: Information technology in the classroom: experiences and recommendations. Campus - Wide Inf. Syst. 17(1), 10–15 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rovai, A.P.: Online and traditional assessments: what is the difference? Internet High. Educ. 3(3), 141–151 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanna, D.E.: Higher education in an era of digital competition: emerging organizational models. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 2(1), 66–95 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Harmon, O., Lambrinos, J., Buffolino, J.: Assessment design and cheating risk in online instruction. Online J. Distance Learn. Adm. 13(3) (2010). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/Fall133/harmon_lambrinos_buffolino133.html. Accessed 24 July 2018

  12. Apampa, K, Wills G., Argles, D.: User security issues in summative e-assessment. Secur. Int. J. Digit. Soc. (IJDS) (2010). https://infonomics-society.org/wp-content/uploads/ijds/published-papers/volume-1-2010/User-Security-Issues-in-Summative-E-Assessment-Security.pdf

  13. Karim, N.A., Shukur, Z.: Proposed features of an online examination interface design and its optimal values. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 414–422 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ullah, A., Xiao, H., Barker, T., Lilley, M.: Evaluating security and usability of profile based challenge questions authentication in online examinations. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 5(1), 2 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, Q.: Biometric authentication to prevent e-cheating. Instr. Technol. (2012). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315643312_Biometric_Authentication_to_Prevent_e-Cheating

  16. Hastings, N.E., Dodson, D.F.: Quantifying assurance of knowledge based authentication. In: 3rd European Conference on Information Warfare and Security, ECIW (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Figueroa, A.M., Juarez-Ramirez, R., Inzunza, S., Valenzuela, R.: Implementing adaptive interfaces: a user model for the development of usability in interactive systems. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 29(1), 95–104 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rau, P.-L.P., Choong, Y.-Y., Salvendy, G.: A cross cultural study on knowledge representation and structure in human computer interfaces. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 34(2), 117–129 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy, Y., Ramin, M.: A Theoretical Approach for Biometrics Authentication of e-Exams (2007). http://telem-pub.openu.ac.il/users/chais/2007/morning_1/M1_6.pdf

  20. Flior, E., Kowalski, K.: Continuous biometric user authentication in online examinations. In: Seventh International Conference on Information Technology, pp. 488– 492 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Penteado, B.E., Marana, A.N.: A video-based biometric authentication for e-Learning web applications. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 24, pp. 770–779. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01347-8_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Alotaibi, S.: Using biometrics authentication via fingerprint recognition in e-exams in e-learning environment. In: The 4th Saudi International Conference. The University of Manchester, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Asha, S., Chellappan, C.: Authentication of e-learners using multimodal biometric technology. In: International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies, pp. 1–6, Islamabad (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rabuzin, K., Baca, M., Sajko, M.: E-learning: biometrics as a security factor. In: Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology, pp. 64–64 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ball, S.: Accessibility in e-assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34(3), 293–303 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gras, R., Kuntz, P.: An overview of the statistical implicative analysis (SIA) development. Stud. Comput. Intell. (SCI) 127, 11–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lerman, I.C.: Foundations and Methods in Combinatorial and Statistical Data Analysis and Clustering. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6793-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Jelfs, A., Richardson, J.T.: The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 44(2), 338–351 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baneres, D., Baró, X., Guerrero-Roldán, A., Rodríguez, M.: Adaptive e-assessment system: a general approach Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (2016). http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/5888. Accessed 24 July 2018

  30. von Schomberg, R.: Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In: Dusseldorp, M., Beecroft, R. (eds.) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren, pp. 39–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank colleagues in the TeSLA project for their support and the reviewers of TEA conference. This work is supported by the H2020-ICT-2015/H2020-ICT-2015, Number 688520.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Okada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., Edwards, C. (2018). Student Acceptance of Online Assessment with e-Authentication in the UK. In: Ras, E., Guerrero Roldán, A. (eds) Technology Enhanced Assessment. TEA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 829. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97806-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97807-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics