Skip to main content

Restorative Justice and Punitive Restoration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy ((PASEPP))

  • 1980 Accesses

Abstract

Restorative justice approaches offer a promising alternative to formal sentencing. Victims are more satisfied, reoffending is less and at reduced costs. However, these findings are limited in scale and application that confine these approaches to relatively few cases that restrict their potential. I argue for a fundamental revision called punitive restoration that permits otherwise forbidden options like hard treatment. Punitive restoration can justify their use where they can best enable the restoration of rights for offenders in light of their circumstances as a means of fulfilling the aim of restoration instead of penal abolition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ashworth, Andrew. (1994). “Sentencing,” in Mike Maguire, Rod Morgan, and Robert Reiner (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 819–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Andrew. (2002). “Responsibilities, Rights and Restorative Justice,” British Journal of Criminology 42: 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2004). “The Right to Trial by Jury,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2012). Punishment. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2014a). “Stakeholder Sentencing,” in Jesper Ryberg and Julian Roberts (eds.), Popular Punishment: On the Normative Significance of Public Opinion for Penal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–203.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2014b). “Criminal Harms,” in Thom Brooks (ed.), Law and Legal Theory. Boston: Brill, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2014c). “On F. H. Bradley’s ‘Some Remarks on Punishment’,” Ethics 125: 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2015). “Punitive Restoration: Rehabilitating Restorative Justice.” Raisons Politiques: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2016a). “Justice as Stakeholding,” in Krushil Watene and Jay Drydyk (eds.), Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. (2016b). “Punitive Restoration: Giving the Public a Say on Sentencing,” in Albert Dzur, Ian Loader, and Richard Sparks (eds.), Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 140–161.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Nils. (1998). “Conflicts as Property,” in Andrew von Hirsch and Andrew Ashworth (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy. Oxford: Hart, 312–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Marilyn, Craig T. Love, Donald S. Shepard, Cheryl B. Peterson, Karen L. White, and Frank B. Hall. (2004). “Cost-Effectiveness of Connecticut’s In-Prison Substance Abuse Treatment,” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 39: 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, Steven N., and Daniel S. Nagin. (2011). “Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both Be Reduced?” Criminology and Public Policy 10: 13–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, George W., Kevin Knight, D. Dwayne Simpson, Patrick M. Flynn, Janis T. Morey, Norma G. Bartholomew, Michele Staton Tindall, William M. Burdon, Elizabeth A. Hall, Steve S. Martin, and Daniel J. O’Connell. (2012). “An Evaluation of Six Brief Interventions That Target Drug-related Problems in Correctional Populations.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 51: 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, Gerry, and Daniel W. Van Ness. (2007). “The Meaning of Restorative Justice,” in Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. New York: Routledge, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, Jennifer J., and Robert Howse. (1999). “Institutions for Restorative Justice: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” The University of Toronto Law Journal 49: 355–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home Office Occasional Paper. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Brenda. (2007). “Schools and Restorative Justice,” in Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. New York: Routledge, 325–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, Bhikhu. (2008). A New Politics of Identity: Political Principles for an Interdependent World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, Deanna M., and Wesley G. Jenings. (2012). “Treatment Behind Bars: The Effectiveness of Prison-Based Therapy for Sex Offenders,” Journal of Crime and Justice 35: 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restorative Justice Council. (2011). What Does the Ministry of Justice RJ Research Tell Us? London: Restorative Justice Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, Becca Chapman, E. Colledge, James Digman, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. (2006). Restorative Justice in Practice: The Second Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. Centre for Criminological Research, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, Joanne, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, James Dignan, Lucy Edwards, Jeremy Hibbert, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. (2008). Does Restorative Justice Affect Reconviction? The Fourth Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. London Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, Joanna, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. (2011). Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Peter, Brian A. (2006). “The Needs of Offenders and the Process of Changing Them,” in Graham T. Towl (ed.), Psychological Research in Prisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 24–53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Towl, Graham J. (2006). “Drug-Misuse Intervention Work,” in Graham J. Towl (ed.), Psychological Research in Prisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 116–127.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ness, Daniel W. (2007). “Prisons and Restorative Justice,” in Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. New York: Routledge, 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirsch, Andrew, and Andrew Ashworth. (2005). Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Monica. (2011). “Beyond the Retributive Public: Governance and Public Opinion on Penal Policy,” Journal of Crime and Justice 35: 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am enormously grateful to the Department of Philosophy at Bowling Green State University for comments on an earlier draft with special thanks to Albert Dzur, Douglas Husak and Richard Lippke .

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thom Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brooks, T. (2018). Restorative Justice and Punitive Restoration. In: Gardner, M., Weber, M. (eds) The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics