Abstract
Jails in the United States hold both pre-trial detainees and persons convicted of less serious crimes. Jails are uniquely inhospitable institutions whose denizens are disproportionately socially marginalized, mentally ill, and struggling with problems of substance abuse. The case against jails consists of two parts: First, we should curtail the use of pre-trial detention. Accused persons who are justifiably detained should not be kept in punishment facilities, since they have not yet been convicted. Second, convicted offenders who are currently housed in jails should be dealt with in other ways. Most are not dangerous and will be returning to civil society in relatively short order. The focus should be on doing less harm to them and addressing their criminogenic needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lippke, R.L. (2018). The Case Against Jails. In: Gardner, M., Weber, M. (eds) The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97769-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97770-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)