Skip to main content

Theory Is Technology; Technology Is Theory

Linda Monsees in Conversation with Ole Wæver

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies of International Relations

Abstract

New technology is undoubtedly changing world politics. But does this necessarily require new theories? In this interview, we explore the challenges facing a (political) theory of technology and how to understand the novelty of technologies such as Big Data. Ole Wæver recounts his early interest in technology and how theorizing technology demands that we look at different kinds of acts. Some of the main challenges include unintended effects and the assessment of decisions made within complex systems. We go back to Langdon Winner’s early work on the political character of technology, and discuss why his ideas might be more valuable than concepts often subsumed under the heading of ‘New Materialism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Referenced

  • Andersen, K., Wahl, T., & Wæver, O. (1983). Prometheus og Panodora: Informationsteknologi som politisk teknologi (BA thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. New York: Knopf (French original 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (1998). The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization, 52(4), 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2009). Waltz’s theory of theory. International Relations, 23(2), 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2011). Politics, security, theory. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2014, January 2). Open science to fight big threats like the nuclear bomb—The centennial of Niels Bohr’s atomic model. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/open-science-to-fight-big-threats-like-the-nuclear-bomb-21591.

  • Wæver, O. (2015). The theory act: Responsibility and exactitude as seen from securitization. International Relations, 29(1), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2017). The international politics of dramatically dangerous technologies. Presentation at the annual meeting of 4S, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Dædalus, 109(1), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18(3), 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Monsees, L., Wæver, O. (2019). Theory Is Technology; Technology Is Theory. In: Kaltofen, C., Carr, M., Acuto, M. (eds) Technologies of International Relations . Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97418-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics