We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Freud’s Direct Arguments Against the Consciousness Criterion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freud and Philosophy of Mind, Volume 1
  • 808 Accesses

Abstract

Freud provides a number of arguments directly against the consciousness criterion—the view that mind equals consciousness. In this chapter, I evaluate these critical arguments and argue that, although many understand these to be the primary arguments Freud marshals for his positive position, they fail to do the stand-alone work that they are claimed to do. The problem, I argue, is that to argue against Cartesianism one cannot directly attack the consciousness criterion. Rather, one must start by understanding consciousness and identifying its mental-relevant essence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Descartes, R. (1967). The passions of the soul. In E. S. Haldane & G. R. T. Ross (Eds. & Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 329–427). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1649).

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1991). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 3): The correspondence (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original letter written 6 June 1647).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshleman, M. C. (2007). The Cartesian unconscious. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 24(3), 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159–215). London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1958). A note on the unconscious in psycho-analysis. In S. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 255–266). London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1964a). An outline of psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 139–208). London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1964b). Some elementary lessons in psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 279–286). London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G. (2011). Transparency of mind: The contributions of Descartes, Leibniz, and Berkeley to the genesis of the modern subject. In H. Busche (Ed.), Departure for modern Europe: A handbook of early modern philosophy (pp. 361–375). Hamburg, DE: Felix Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover (Original work published 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, N. C. (2000). A tumbling-ground for whimsies? The history and contemporary role of the conscious/unconscious contrast. In T. Crane & S. Patterson (Eds.), The history of the mind-body problem (pp. 148–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, C. (1888). The nervous system and the mind. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, R. S. (2013). The unconscious without Freud. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. (1999). Freud’s philosophy of the unconscious. New York, NY: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1910). A text-book of psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome C. Wakefield .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wakefield, J.C. (2018). Freud’s Direct Arguments Against the Consciousness Criterion. In: Freud and Philosophy of Mind, Volume 1. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96343-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics