Skip to main content

How to Express Risk, Confidence and (Un)Certainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Does Government Listen to Scientists?
  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

Government is the risk manager of last resort. Science informs the identification of risks and the assessment of options for managing them. Seeking knowledge carries danger, so it is necessary to create the conditions to do so well and safely. Discussion of risk should not be a distraction. Through innovation, science creates both opportunities and risks. Numbers may speak for themselves, but it is essential better to understand what they are saying. The choice of expression is itself something that can be approached with rigour and based on observation. Increasingly, too, it is possible to reflect on how individual decision-making and public debate are informed by specific images and words. Notions of error, and expressions of different types of (un)certainty inform how decisions get made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 22.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blastland, M., & Spigelhalter, D. (2013). The norm chronicles: Stories and numbers about danger and death. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroll, L. (1871). Through the looking-glass, and what Alice found there. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. H. (2018, May 5). Risk management in a policy environment: The particular challenges associated with extreme risks. Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R. (2004). Public perception of risk. UK Office of Science and Technology. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org

  • Government Office for Science. (2012). Blackett review of high impact low probability risks. UK Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. J., & Corner, A. (2011). Communicating environmental risks: Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 1571–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, M. (2011). Wilful blindness. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, R., & Gunawan, B. (2018). The natural hazards partnership: A public-sector collaboration across the UK for natural hazard disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2012). Science and public reason. Earthscan. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. (2010). Virtual words: Langage from the edge of science and technology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofstedt, R. (2011). Risk versus hazard – How to regulate in the 21st century. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerny, G. J., Chen, M., Freeman, R., Gavaghan, D., Meyer, M., Rowland, F., … Hortal, J. (2014). Information visualisation for science and policy: Engaging users and avoiding bias. Science, 29(3), 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J. A. (2014). Visions of science, books and readers at the dawn of the Victorian age. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, R. C., & Hassol, S. J. (2011, October). Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today. Retrieved April 22, 2018, from https://www.climatecommunication.org

  • Spiegelhalter, D. (2017, February 20). Does air pollution kill 40,000 people each year in the UK? Winton Centre. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from https://medium.com/wintoncentre

  • Taleb, N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government. (2017). The national risk register of civil emergencies. Gov.uk. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications

  • Walport, M., & Craig, C. (2014). Annual report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2014. Innovation and risk: Managing risk, not avoiding it. Government Office for Science. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Craig, C. (2019). How to Express Risk, Confidence and (Un)Certainty. In: How Does Government Listen to Scientists?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96086-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics