Abstract
This chapter begins by examining specific, sweeping endorsements of genetically engineered, technological fixes based on a progressive interpretation of the history of agriculture. It then shows how a pessimistic interpretation that counters the optimistic view by emphasizing the harmful, unintended consequences of technological agriculture. These rival interpretations cancel each other out: we need a more balanced, pragmatic philosophy of technology to understand and evaluate innovations in agricultural biotechnology. I then apply the pragmatic criticisms of technological fixes developed in this chapter to evaluate two proposed genetically engineered, technological fixes. One is a genetically engineered pig designed as a fix for phosphorus pollution. For the other example, I return to Golden Rice as a fix for the sociopolitical problem of poverty leading to micronutrient malnutrition. This case-by-case examination avoids the sweeping pro and con positions of technological pessimism and technological optimism that drive the polarized debate over agricultural biotechnology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates Calls for Support of World’s Poorest Farmers. Gates Foundation. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2009/10/Bill-Gates-Calls-for-United-Action-to-Support-Worlds-Poorest-Farmers.
Borlaug, N. 2000. Ending world hunger: The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiology 2 (124): 487–490. http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/124/2/487. Accessed 24 May 2016.
Cho, R. 2013. Phosphorus: Essential to life—are we running out? State of the planet. Earth Institute, Columbia University. 1 April. http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2013/04/01/phosphorus-essential-to-life-are-we-running-out/. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.
Conway, G. 2002. Open letter to Greenpeace. In Genetically modified foods: Debating biotechnology, ed. D. Castle and M. Ruse, 63–65. Amherst: Prometheus Book.
Davison, N. 2013. China’s taste for pork serves up pollution problem. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/01/china-taste-pork-pollution-problem. Accessed 14 Jan 2016.
Diaz, R.J., and R. Rosenberg. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321 (5891): 926–929.
Drengson, A.R. 1984. The sacred and the limits of the technological fix. Zygon 19 (3): 259–275.
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2005. Livestock policy brief 02: Pollution from industrialized livestock production. FAO http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0261e.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
———. 2007. Livestock’s long shadow, environmental issues and options. Rome: LEAD.
———. 2012. Feeding the world. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2490e/i2490e03a.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
Golden Rice Humanitarian Board. 2009. The golden rice project. Golden Rice. http://www.goldenrice.org. Accessed 28 Oct 2005.
Golovan, S.P., R.G. Meidinger, A. Ajakaiye, M. Cottrill, M.Z. Wiederkehr, D.J. Barney, C. Plante, J.W. Pollard, M.Z. Fan, M.A. Hayes, J. Laursen, R.R. Hacker, J.P. Hjorth, J.P. Phillips, and C.W. Forsberg. 2001. Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure. Nature Biotechnology 19: 741–745.
Hillel, D. 1991. Out of the earth: Civilization and the life of the soil. Berkley: University of California Press.
Leyser, O. 2014. Moving beyond the GM debate. PLoS Biology 12 (6): e1001887.
McKibben, B. 2003. Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Paarlberg, R. 2005. From the green revolution to the gene revolution. Environment 47 (1): 38–40.
Pork Checkoff. Top 10 pork-producing countries. Pork Checkoff. http://www.pork.org/pork-quick-facts/home/stats/u-s-pork-exports/top-10-pork-producing-countries/.
Rockström, J., and M. Klum. 2015. Big world, small planet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P.K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R.W. Corell, V.J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J.A. Foley. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (24): 472–475.
Rosset, P. 2002. Taking seriously the claim that genetic engineering could end world hunger: A critical analysis. In Engineering the farm: Ethical and social aspects of agricultural biotechnology, ed. B. Bailey and M. Lapppé, 81–93. Washington: Island Press.
Shiva, V. 2002. Golden rice hoax: When public relations replace science. In Genetically modified foods: Debating biotechnology, ed. M. Ruse and D. Castle, 58–62. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Steffen, W., Å. Persson, L. Deutsch, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, K. Richardson, C. Crumley, P. Crutzen, C. Folke, L. Gordon, M. Molina, V. Ramanathan, J. Rockström, M. Scheffer, H. Joachim Schellnhuber, and U. Svedin. 2011. The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40 (7): 739–761.
———. 2002. GM food is the best option we have. In The ethics of food: A reader for the twenty-first century, ed. G. Pence, 148–155. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Thompson, P. B. 2009. Can agricultural biotechnology help the poor? The answer is yes, but with qualifications. Science Progress. 8 June. http://scienceprogress.org/2009/06/ag-biotech-thompson/. Accessed 25 May 2016.
________. 2014. The GMO quandary and what it means for social philosophy. Social philosophy today 30: 7–27.
United Nations Foundation. What we do: Millennium development goals. UN Foundation. http://www.unfoundation.org/what-we-do/issues/mdgs.html.
Vestel, L.B. 2001. The next pig thing. Mother Jones. http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2001/10/next-pig-thing. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
White, L.T. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155 (3767): 1203–1207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott, N.D. (2018). Technological Fixes II, Genetic Engineering, Technological Pragmatism and Planetary Boundaries. In: Food, Genetic Engineering and Philosophy of Technology. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96027-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96027-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96025-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96027-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)