Abstract
When thinking, we use very often natural concepts – the building blocks of our common-sense knowledge. Consequently, creativity may depend on the characteristics of a person’s natural concepts. Natural concepts are composed from a representation of a “prototype” exemplar and a space of accepted dissimilarities from it, and they have no clear boundaries. They enable people to differentiate objects according to the degree of their “typicality” and to reject or include them – automatically or deliberatively – as exemplars of a given concept. Natural concepts differ in their plasticity, that is – in the amount of accepted dissimilarities from the prototypic characteristics. It may be assumed that higher plasticity within a given life domain facilitates creative thinking in this domain. In several studies we have reinforced experimentally the plasticity of concepts within a given domain and compared the effects with placebo. The results show the facilitating role of induced concepts’ plasticity in different aspects of creative thinking and in openness to novel experiences. In the chapter, we will present the theory and data as well as practical conclusions related to education and therapeutic work, key contexts of social creativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addison, N., Burgess, L., Steers, J., & Trowell, J. (2010). Understanding art education: Engaging reflexively with practice. London: Routledge.
Anglin, J. (1970). The growth of word meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
Bierwisch, M. (1971). On classifying semantic features. In D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bojesen, E. (2015). Educational plasticity: Catherine Malabou and ‘the feeling of a new responsibility’. Educational Philosophy and Theory: Incorporating ACCESS, 47(10), 1039–1051.
Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects or recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48.
Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119.
Deese, J. (1967). Meaning and change of meaning. American Psychologist, 22(8), 641–651.
Dillon, P., Craft, A., Best, P., Rigby, A., & Simms, K. (2007). Turning peases west inside out: Flexible educational environments for developing possibilities and pedagogies. Creative Partnerships Durham Sunderland.
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47.
Eliawa, N. (1967). Badania nad kształtowaniem się pojęć w pracach psychologów gruzińskich, [Studies on concept formation in works of Georgian (USSR) psychologists], Psychologia Wychowawcza, 2.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.
Franks, J. J., & Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(1), 65–74.
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267.
Gandini, L., Hill, L., Cadwell, L., & Schwall, C. (Eds.). (2005). In the spirit of the studio: Learning from the Atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Gordon, W. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hampton, J. A. (1993). Prototype models of concept representation. In I. van Mechelen, J. A. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 67–95). London: Academic Press.
Jacobsen, T. L., & Asher, J. J. (1963). Validity of the concept constancy measure of creative problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 68(1), 9–19.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kendall, L., Morrison, J., Sharp, C., & Yeshanew, T. (2008). The longer-term impact of Creative Partnerships on the attainment of young people: Results from 2005 and 2006. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Klein, G. S., Gardner, R. W., & Schlesinger, H. J. (1962). Tolerance for unrealistic experience: A study of the generality of a cognitive control. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 41–55.
Koestler, A. (1965). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts, The 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 183–228.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.
Lerner, R., & Hood, K. E. (1986). Plasticity in development: Concepts and issues for intervention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 7(2), 139–152.
Leung, A. K.-y., & Chiu, C.-y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5–6), 723–741.
Mednick, M., Mednick, S., & Mednick, E. (1964). Incubation of creative performance at specific associative priming. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 84–88.
Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Moran, S. (2010). Creativity in school. In K. Littleton, C. Woods, & J. K. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 319–359). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neumann, P. G. (1974). An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes. Memory and Cognition, 2, 241–248.
Newport, E. L., & Bellugi, U. (1978). Linguistic expression of category levels in a visual-gestural language: A flower is a flower. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 49–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Peterson, M., Meagher, R., Chait, J., & Gillie, K. (1973). The abstraction and generalization of dot pattern. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 378–398.
Pettigrew, T. (1958). The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable. Journal of Personality, 26, 532–544.
Posner, M. I. (1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
Prince, G. (1970). The practice of creativity. New York: Harper & Row.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407.
Rips, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 665–681.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(1), 1–20.
Robinson, K. (1998). Creativity knows no stereotypes. Times Educational Supplement, 3, 13.
Robson, J., & Jaaniste, L. (2010). Growing future innovators. http://pica.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Growing_Future_Innovators_online_report.pdf.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
Rosch, E. (1975a). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532–547.
Rosch, E. (1975b). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.
Rosch, E. (1976). The good-old-days effect: Misjudgment of frequency as a function of typicality (Unpublished manuscript). Available from Eleanor Rosch, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Rumelhart, E. D., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 506–514.
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaption, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281–303). New York: Plenum.
Shank, K., & Abelson, K. (1977). Scripts, plan, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
Shoben, E. (1976). The verification of semantic relations in a same-different paradigm: An asymmetry in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 12, 1–20.
Sieber, J., & Lanzetta, J. (1966). Some determinants of individual differences in predecision information- processing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 561–571.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 86–94.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E., & Rips, L. (1974). Semantic memory and psychological semantics. Psychology of Learning Motivation, 8, 1–45.
Sternberg, R. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338.
Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In R. W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1992). Can we teach children to think critically. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), 114–143.
Tourette, G. (1976). Role de la spécialité dans l’apprentissage et la memorisation de listes categorielles, Annes Psychologiąues, 461–480.
Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview of educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301–312.
Trzebiński, J. (1980). Natural concepts and creativity. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 11(1), 41–61.
Trzebiński, J. (1981). Twórczość a struktura pojęć [Structure of concepts and creativity]. Warszawa, Poland: PWN.
Wallach, M., & Caron, A. (1959). Attribute criticality and sex-linked conservatism as determinants of psychological similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 43–50.
Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity – intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Wang, H. C., Fussell, S. R., & Cosley, D. (2011). From diversity to creativity: Stimulating group brainstorming with cultural differences and conversationally-retrieved pictures. In Proceedings of CSCW 2011 (pp. 265–274), New York: ACM Press.
Ward, W. C. (1969). Creativity and environmental cues in nursery school children. Development Psychology, 1(5), 543–547.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972). Dociekania filozoficzne. Warszawa, Poland: PWN.
Worell, J., & Worell, L. (1965). Personality conflict, originality of response and recall. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(1), 55–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trzebiński, J., Wołowicz, A. (2019). The Plasticity of Natural Concepts and Creativity. In: Lebuda, I., Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95497-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95498-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)