Abstract
Past research examining group creativity has focused almost exclusively on the divergent process of ideation. However, we recognize that group innovation is also dependent upon convergent processes such as idea selection and implementation. In the present chapter we review the existing theory and research relevant to both the divergent and convergent processes of effective group innovation. We place particular focus on the ways in which facilitating conditions may impact each innovation phase (divergent and convergent), whether similarly or uniquely. Finally, we present a theoretical model in which we propose various intervening factors that may link productive group ideation to optimal idea selection and implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baas, B. M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2011). Category assignment and relatedness in the group ideation process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1070–1077.
Baruah, J., Paulus, P. B., & Kohn, N. (2018, July). The refinement of ideas after selection: Does order of feasibility and originality focus matter? Presented at the INGRoup conference, Washington, DC.
Basadur, M., & Gelade, G. A. (2006). The role of knowledge management in the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 45–62.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 51–55.
Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071–1080.
Coskun, H., Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., & Sherwood, J. J. (2000). Cognitive stimulation and problem presentation in idea generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 307–329.
Coursey, L. E., Gertner, R., Williams, B. C., Kenworthy, J. B., Paulus, P. B., & Doboli, S. (2018). Trapped inside the box: The fixation of high expertise in conversations leading to collaborative innovation (Unpublished manuscript). University of Texas at Arlington.
Coursey, L. E., Paulus, P. B., Kenworthy, J. B., & Williams, B. C. (in press). The role of individual differences in group and team creativity. In R. Reiter-Palmon & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace. New York: Elsevier.
Coursey, L. E., Williams, B. C., Kenworthy, J.B., Paulus, P. B., & Doboli, S. (in press). Diversity and group creativity in an online, asynchronous environment. Journal of Creative Behavior.
Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761–773.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.
DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549–1581.
Dennis, A. R., Minas, R. K., & Williams, M. I. (in press). Creativity in computer-mediated virtual groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford.
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Connolly, T., & Wynne, B. E. (1996). Process structure in electronical brainstorming. Information Systems Research, 7, 268–277.
Deuja, A., Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., & Korde, R. (2014). Taking a broad perspective before brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(3), 222–236.
de Vreede, G.-J., Briggs, R. O., & Kolfschoten, G. L. (2006). ThinkLets: A pattern language for facilitated and practitioner-guided collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 25(2/3), 140–154.
de Vries, H. B., & Lubart, T. I. (2017). Scientific creativity: Divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. Journal of Creative Behavior.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 313–320.
Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722–735.
Dunbar, N. E., & Mejia, R. (2013). A qualitative analysis of power-based entrainment and interactional synchrony in couples. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 391–405.
Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2016). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: Theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 87–108.
Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591–605.
Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, V., & Karwowski, M. (in press). Are people working together inclined towards practicality? A process analysis of creative ideation in individuals and dyads. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 822–832.
Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343.
Harvey, S., & Kou, C. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.
Kerr, D. S., & Murthy, U. S. (2004). Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(4), 381–399.
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78–94.
Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–561.
Kolfschoten, G. L., & Brazier, F. M. T. (2013). Cognitive load in collaboration: Convergence. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(5), 975–996.
Korde, R., & Paulus, P. B. (2016). Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 177–190.
Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175–184.
Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 231–246.
McMahon, K., Ruggeri, A., Kämmer, J. E., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016). Beyond idea generation: The power of groups in developing ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 247–257.
Meadow, A., Parnes, S. J., & Reese, H. (1959). Influence of brainstorming instructions and problem sequence on a creative problem solving test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), 413–416.
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13–17.
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3–23.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122.
Nakui, T., Paulus, P. B., & van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The role of attitudes in reactions to diversity in work groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2327–2351.
Nemeth, C. J., & Ormiston, M. (2007). Creative idea generation: Harmony versus stimulation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 524–535.
Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea-generating groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137–159). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.
Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 535–544.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribners.
Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of group brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 248–265.
Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 575–586.
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., & Kohn, N. (2012). Collaborative creativity—group creativity and team innovation. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 327–357). New York: Elsevier.
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G. W., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78–89.
Paulus, P. B., & Kenworthy, J. (in press). Effective brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford.
Paulus, P. B., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2017). Group and intergroup creativity. In L. Argote & J. Levine (Eds.), The handbook of group and organizational learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., & Arditti, L. E. (2011). Effects of quantity and quality instructions of brainstorming. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 38–46.
Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., Arditti, L. E., & Korde, R. M. (2013). Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44, 332–352.
Paulus, P. B., Korde, R. M., Dickson, J. J., Carmeli, A., & Cohen-Meitar, R. (2015). Asynchronous brainstorming in an industrial setting: Exploratory studies. Human Factors, 57(6), 1076–1094.
Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., Putman, V. L., Leggett, K. L., & Roland, E. J. (1996). Social influence processing in computer brainstorming. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 3–14.
Paulus, P. B., Nakui, T., Putman, V. L., & Brown, V. R. (2006). Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(3), 206–219.
Paulus, P. B., van der Zee, K. I., & Kenworthy, J. (in press). Diversity and group creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76–87.
Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, P. B., & Coskun, H. (2013). Group creativity. In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 215–239). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules, and decision making. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 23–39.
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43–47.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: Is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 107–114.
Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244–251.
Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 933–946.
Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (in press). Why great ideas are often overlooked: A review and theoretical analysis of research on idea evaluation and selection. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco & M. A. Runco (Eds.), (pp. 69–94). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (in press). Group creativity and collective choice. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Rowe, P. A. (2012). Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 519–612.
van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38–53.
Valacich, J. S., & Schwenk, C. (1985). Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on group decision making using computer-mediated versus verbal communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 158–173.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: J. Cape.
West, M. A. (2003). Innovation implementation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 245–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgment
The preparation of this chapter was supported by collaborative grant INSPIRE BCS 1247971 to the first and third authors from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paulus, P.B., Coursey, L.E., Kenworthy, J.B. (2019). Divergent and Convergent Collaborative Creativity. In: Lebuda, I., Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95497-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95498-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)