Abstract
The interactive relationship between the individual and the social constituents of the creative process emerges strongly during the evaluation of the outcomes of the process. In fact, the contrast with social and cultural norms depicting the originality and effectiveness of an idea brings into the creative process a high level of affective arousal, that can be either beneficial or detrimental to the creative process. Why are some people more able to face this contrast and to resist the frustration arising from repeated negative evaluation is the issue addressed in a recent study, summarized in this chapter. Specifically, the study focused on the analysis of the individual differences defining creative performance during situations of creative frustration and creative success. In particular, the differences in the ability to manage attentive and emotional resources, as well as the differences in trait emotional intelligence (trait EI), a personality trait defining the ability to process, use, and manage affect-laden information of an intrapersonal or interpersonal nature, have been explored during these conditions. Results highlighted the central role of trait EI in the management of attentive and affective resources under frustration and success conditions, strongly influencing people’s creative performance. In particular, individual differences in the management of the affective arousal deriving from the contrast with evaluations coming from the external environment emerged to be essential in distinguishing between a successful and an inconclusive creative process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G. E. (in press). Emotions: The spinal cord of the creative thinking process. In R. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. New York, NY: Springer.
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304.
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). The emotionally intelligent use of attention and affective arousal under creative frustration and creative success. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.041.
Agnoli, S., Pittarello, A., Hysenbelli, D., & Rubaltelli, E. (2015). “Give, but give until it hurts”: The modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence on the motivation to help. PLoS One, 10, e0130704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130704.
Agnoli, S., Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). Exploring the link between mind wandering, mindfulness, and creativity: A multidimensional approach. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411423.
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion, 12, 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027358.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024.
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.014.
Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Self-esteem and responses to success and failure: Subsequent performance and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality, 53, 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00376.x.
Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036618.
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x.
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017868.
Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499.
Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627.
De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2006). Emotional intelligence as predictor of mental, social, and physical health in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005965.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An Intercultural and Cross-disciplinary Journal, 1(2), 83–96.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Distributing creativity: Three thought experiments. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 67–81). Singapore: Springer.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12–21.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
He, Y., Yao, X., Wang, S., & Caughron, J. (2016). Linking failure feedback to individual creativity: The moderation role of goal orientation. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125248.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.
Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from non-losses and losses from non-gains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1402.
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039826.
Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_2.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.
Mendelsohn, G., & Lindholm, E. (1972). Individual differences and the role of attention in the use of cues in verbal problem solving. Journal of Personality, 40, 226–241.
Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.
Mikolajczak, M., Petrides, K. V., Coumans, N., & Luminet, O. (2009). The moderating effect of trait emotional intelligence on mood deterioration following laboratory-induced stress. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 455–477.
Necka, E. (1999). Creativity and attention. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 30, 85–97.
Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X.
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differerences, 33, 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1.
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence. Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.466.
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender-specific model of organizational variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00019.x.
Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Konakki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X120618.
Pittarello, A., Conte, B., Caserotti, M., Scrimin, S., & Rubaltelli, E. (2017). Emotional intelligence buffers the effect of physiological arousal on dishonesty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1285-9.
Rubaltelli, E., Agnoli, S., & Franchin, L. (2016). Sensitivity to affective information and investors’ evaluation of past performance: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1885.
Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(72), 3–30.
Sapp, D. D. (1992). The point of creative frustration and the creative process: A new look at an old model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 21–28.
Sevdalis, N., Petrides, K. V., & Harvey, N. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence and decision-related emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.012.
Silvia, P. J., & Phillips, A. G. (2004). Self-awareness, self-evaluation, and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1009–1017.
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 174–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677.
Teichner, W. H., Arees, E., & Reilly, R. (1963). Noise and human performance: A psychophysiological approach. Ergonomics, 6, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136308930678.
Tyagi, V., Hanoch, Y., Hall, S. D., Runco, M., & Denham, S. L. (2017). The risky side of creativity: Domain specific risk taking in creative individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 145.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa, Psychology Publications.
Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., Corazza, G.E. (2019). How Do You Manage Evaluation? Attentive and Affective Constituents of Creative Performance Under Perceived Frustration or Success. In: Lebuda, I., Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95497-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95498-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)