Abstract
The Lucky Anglophone Scholar Doctrine as the privileged orthodoxy in the domain of scholarly publication portrays Anglophone scholars as an undifferentiated mass bestowed with symbolic, social, and cultural capitals for scholarly publication by virtue of their native speaker status or membership in prestigious institutions of higher education. This dominant discourse has resulted in an approach to research which has extremely marginalized and underrepresented writing for scholarly publication practices of Anglophone scholars. This chapter presents a critical perspective on the discourse of The Lucky Anglophone Scholar doctrine and highlights the exigency of further empirical research into writing for scholarly publication practices of Anglophone scholars, especially novice scholars.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bax, S. (2011). Normalization revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching,1(2), 1–15.
Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boice, R. (1990). Professors as writers: A self-help guide to productive writing. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668.
Brewer, E. W., Marmon, D., & McMahan-Landers, J. (2004). Basic advice for manuscript preparation for junior faculty members and graduate students. College Student Journal,38(1), 16–23.
Caplan, N. A., & Cox, M. (2016). The state of graduate communication support: Results of an international survey. In Simpson et al. (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers (pp. 22–51). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Casanave, C. P. (1998). Transitions: The balancing act of bilingual academics. Journal of Second Language Writing,7(2), 175–203.
Casanave, C. P. (2010). Dovetailing under impossible circumstances. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 83–101). New York, NY: Routledge.
Casanave, C. P. (2016). What advisors need to know about the invisible “real-life” struggles of doctoral dissertation writers. In Simpson et al. (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers (pp. 97–116). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Cho, S. (2004). Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity & Education,3(1), 47–72.
Chun, C. W. (2017). The discourses of capitalism: Everyday economists and the production of common sense (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the doctorate: A guide to success. London: Open University Press.
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2012). Language socialization approaches to second language learning acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–117). Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
Fairbanks, K., & Dias, S. (2016). Going beyond L2 graduate writing: Redesigning an ESL program to meet the needs of both L2 and L1 graduate students. In Simpson et al. (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers (pp. 139–158). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ferguson, G., Pérez-Llantada, C., & Plo, R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: A study of attitudes. World Englishes,30(1), 41–59.
Flowerdew, J. (1999a). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing,8(2), 123–145.
Flowerdew, J. (1999b). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing,8(3), 243–264.
Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly,34(1), 127–150.
Flowerdew, J. (2007). The non-anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication. AILA Review,20(1), 14–27.
Habibie, P. (2015). An investigation into writing for scholarly publication by novice scholars: Practices of Canadian anglophone doctoral students. PhD thesis, The University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Habibie, P. (2016). Writing for scholarly publication in Canadian higher education context: A case study. In C. M. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 51–67). Studies in writing series. Leiden: Brill Publishing.
Hadley, G. (2015). English for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A critical grounded theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalization as creative destruction. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences,610, 21–44.
Hyland, K. (2009). English for professional academic purposes: Writing for scholarly publication. In D. D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp. 83–105). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing,31, 58–69.
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world (pp. 11–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education,33(3), 283–294.
Kapp, C. A., Albertyn, R. M., & Frick, B. L. (2011). Writing for publication: An intervention to overcome barriers to scholarly writing. South African Journal of Higher Education,25(4), 741–759.
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research,1(1), 1–26.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Y. (2006a). Negotiating knowledge contribution to multiple discourse communities: A doctoral student of computer science writing for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing,15(3), 159–178.
Li, Y. (2006b). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes,25(4), 456–478.
Li, Y. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly,41(1), 55–79.
Mauranen, A., Pérez-Llantada, C., & Swales, J. M. (2010). Academic Englishes: A standardised knowledge? In Andy Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The world Englishes handbook (pp. 634–652). London and New York: Routledge.
Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2008). Facilitating writing for publication. Physiotherapy,94(1), 29–34.
Murray, R., Thow, M., Moore, S., & Murphy, M. (2008). The writing consultation: Developing academic writing practices. Journal of Further and Higher Education,32(2), 119–128.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paré, A. (2010). Slow the presses concerns about premature publication. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 83–101). New York, NY: Routledge.
Philips, T. (2013). Tutor training and services for multilingual graduate writers: A reconsideration. Praxis: A Writing Canter Journal, 10(2). Retrieved from www.praxisuwc.com/.
Philips, T. (2016). Writing center support for graduate students: An integrated model. In Simpson et al. (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers (pp. 159–170). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rogers, P., Zawacki, T. M., & Baker, S. (2016). Uncovering challenges and pedagogical complications in dissertation writing and supervisory practices: A multimethod study of doctoral students and advisors. In Simpson et al. (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers (pp. 52–77). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.
Simpson, S., Caplan, N. A., Cox, M., & Philips, T. (2016). Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, and program design. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
St. John, M. J. (1987). Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes, 6, 113–120.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. (2004). The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 247–269.
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Habibie, P. (2019). To Be Native or Not to Be Native: That Is Not the Question. In: Habibie, P., Hyland, K. (eds) Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95332-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95333-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)