Skip to main content

Collecting Weighted Coercions from Crowd-Sourced Lexical Data for Compositional Semantic Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI-isAI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10838))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Type-theoretic frameworks for compositional semantics are aimed at producing structured meaning representations of natural language utterances.

Using elements of lexical semantics, these frameworks are able to model many complex phenomena related to the polysemy of words and their context-dependent meanings. However, they are just as powerful as the lexical resources they can access. This paper explores ways to create and enrich wide-coverage, weighted lexical resources from crowd-sourced data. Specifically, we investigate how existing rich lexical networks – created and validated by serious games – can be used to infer linguistic coercions along with ranking corresponding to preferences in their interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher, N.: Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bekki, D.: Dependent type semantics: an introduction. In: Christoff, Z., Galeazzi, P., Gierasimczuk, N., Marcoci, A., Smet, S. (eds.) Logic and Interactive RAtionality (LIRa) Yearbook 2012. vol. I, pp. 277–300. University of Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chamberlain, J., Fort, K., Kruschwitz, U., Lafourcade, M., Poesio, M.: Using games to create language resources: successes and limitations of the approach. In: Gurevych, I., Kim, J. (eds.) The People’s Web Meets NLP. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, pp. 3–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35085-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatzikyriakidis, S., Lafourcade, M., Ramadier, L., Zarrouk, M.: Modern type theories and lexical networks: using serious games as the basis for multi-sorted typed systems. J. Lang. Model. 5, 229–272 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatzikyriakidis, S., Luo, Z.: Natural language inference in coq. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 23(4), 441–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-014-9208-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R.: Copredication, dynamic generalized quantification and lexical innovation by coercion. In: Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cruse, D.A.: Lexical Semantics. Cambridge, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fass, D., Wilks, Y.: Preference semantics, ill-formedness, and metaphor. Comput. Linguist. 9(3–4), 178–187 (1983). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1334.980082

    Google Scholar 

  9. Im, S., Lee, C.: A developed analysis of type coercion using asher’s TCL and conventionality. In: Cooper, R., Retoré, C. (eds.) Extended Abstracts of the ESSLLI 2015 Workshop TYTLES: Types Theory and Lexical Semantics, pp. 91–99, August 2015. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01584832

  10. Lafourcade, M.: Making people play for lexical acquisition with the JeuxDeMots prototype. In: SNLP 2007: 7th International Symposium on Natural Language Processing, Pattaya, Chonburi, Thailand, p. 7, December 2007. https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-00200883

  11. Lafourcade, M., Brun, N.L.: Ambiguss, a game for building a sense annotated corpus for French. In: IWCS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lascarides, A.: The pragmatics of word meaning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series: Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge: Polysemy, Ambiguity and Generativity, pp. 75–80 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo, Z.: Contextual analysis of word meanings in type-theoretical semantics. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 159–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo, Z.: Common nouns as types. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 173–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mery, B.: Challenges in the computational implementation of montagovian lexical semantics. In: Kurahashi, S., Ohta, Y., Arai, S., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10247, pp. 90–107. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61572-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mery, B., Moot, R., Retoré, C.: Computing the semantics of plurals and massive entities using many-sorted types. In: Murata, T., Mineshima, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9067, pp. 144–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_11. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01214435

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mery, B., Moot, R., Retoré, C.: Typed Hilbert operators for the lexical semantics of singular and plural determiner phrases. In: Epsilon 2015 - Hilbert’s Epsilon and Tau in Logic, Informatics and Linguistics. Montpellier, France, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mery, B., Retoré, C.: Are books events? ontological inclusions as coercive sub-typing, lexical transfers as entailment. In: LENLS 2012, in jSAI 2015. Kanagawa, Japan, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moot, R.: The grail theorem prover: type theory for syntax and semantics. In: Chatzikyriakidis, S., Luo, Z. (eds.) Modern Perspectives in Type-Theoretical Semantics. SLP, vol. 98, pp. 247–277. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50422-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagao, K.: A preferential constraint satisfaction technique for natural language analysis. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(2), 161–170 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pustejovsky, J.: The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Retoré, C.: The Montagovian Generative Lexicon Lambda Ty\(_n\): a Type Theoretical Framework for Natural Language Semantics. In: 19th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 26, pp. 202–229. Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Mery .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lafourcade, M., Mery, B., Mirzapour, M., Moot, R., Retoré, C. (2018). Collecting Weighted Coercions from Crowd-Sourced Lexical Data for Compositional Semantic Analysis. In: Arai, S., Kojima, K., Mineshima, K., Bekki, D., Satoh, K., Ohta, Y. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10838. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93794-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93794-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93793-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93794-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics