Skip to main content

Discursive Therapies as Institutional Discourse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Therapy as Discourse

Part of the book series: The Language of Mental Health ((TLMH))

Abstract

An institutional discourse perspective is developed and applied to discursive therapies. The perspective focuses on the interactional and interpretive practices that organize therapist-client encounters. Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and Foucauldian discourse analyses are discussed as different but related orientations to institutional discourse. Each perspective highlights different aspects of the institutional discourse perspective and discursive therapies. The perspective is applied by reconsidering the concept of collaboration in discursive therapies. Three issues are discussed. They are the value of thinking about collaboration as a shifting achievement in discursive therapy interactions, power relationships that include the potential for client resistance, and sites for the negotiation of multiple—sometimes competing—discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Gehart, D. (Eds.). (2007). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference (pp. 7–20). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, M. (1988). Foucault interview: Power, moral values, and the intellectual. History of the Present, 4, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2002). Interviewing for solutions (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekberg, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2015). Clients’ resistance to therapists’ proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., & Messinger, S. L. (1977). The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problems, 25, 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, J. E. (1991). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review, 56, 818–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgaca, E., & Advi, E. (2009). Evaluating the talking cure: The contribution of narrative, discourse, and conversation analysis to psychotherapy assessment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. M. S. (2013). The linguistic turn in analytic philosophy. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of analytic philosophy (pp. 926–947). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 72–81). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. C. (Ed.). (1971). The sociological eye: Selected papers on work, self and the study of society. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I. (2007). The discourse of child counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korman, H., Bavelas, J. B., & DeJong, P. (2013). Microanalysis of formulations in solution-focused brief therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and motivational interviewing. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 32, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurri, K., & Wahlström, J. (2005). Placement of responsibility and moral reasoning in couple therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 352–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, A., & Strong, T. (2010). Social constructionism: Sources and stirrings in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, A., & Strong, T. (Eds.). (2012). Discursive perspectives in the therapeutic practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMartin, C. (2008). Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. In A. Peräylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehiläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 80–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, A. I. (2014). Collaborative forms of talk in supervision: A view from discursive psychology. International Journal of Collaborative Practice, 5, 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (1991). The perspective-display series in the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 164–194). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1994). Toward ethnographies of institutional discourse: Proposal and suggestions. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 280–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2014). Culture in solution-focused consultation: An intercultural approach. Journal of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, 1, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & McKergow, M. (2012). From Wittgenstein, complexity and narrative emergence: Discourse and solution-focused brief therapy. In A. Lock & T. Strong (Eds.), Discursive perspectives in therapeutic practice (pp. 163–183). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Silverman, D. (1995). Troubles talk and counseling discourse: A comparative study. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., & Seu, I. B. (2010). ‘Doing family therapy’: A foucauldian discourse analysis. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 12, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntigl, P. (2013). Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 49, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntigl, P., & Horvath, A. O. (2014). The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, D., & Corsiglia, V. (1994). Being solution-focused forced in brief therapy: Remembering something important we already knew. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 31, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday life and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, W. A. (1999). Introduction: The relevance of brief therapy in the current managed care environment. In W. A. Ray & S. d. Shazer (Eds.), Evolving brief therapies: In honor of John H. Weakland (pp. xviii–xvxxv). Galena, IL: Geist & Russell Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1987). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, D. R. (1989). Michel Foucault. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1978). ‘K is mentally ill’: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, T., & Lock, A. (2005). Discursive therapy? Janus Head, 8, 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, O., Diehart, A., & Turner, J. (2013). Responsive persistence part II. Practices of postmodern therapies. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, O., & Strong, T. (2011). Therapeutic collaboration: A conversation analysis of constructionist therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 256–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarragona, M. (2008). Postmodern/poststructuralist therapy. In J. L. Lebow (Ed.), 21st century psychotherapies (pp. 167–205). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weakland, J. H. (1999). That was then, this is now—Some further thoughts. In W. A. Ray & S. d. Shazer (Eds.), Evolving brief therapies: In honor of John H. Weakland (pp. 209–219). Galena, IL: Geist & Russell Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, D. (2008). The philosophical foundations of constructionist research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 13–40). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Stancombe, J. (2003). Clinical judgement in the health and welfare professions: Extending the evidence base. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gale Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miller, G. (2018). Discursive Therapies as Institutional Discourse. In: Smoliak, O., Strong, T. (eds) Therapy as Discourse. The Language of Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics