Skip to main content

BIM-Based Code Compliance Checking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Information Modeling

Abstract

In the construction industry, a large number of codes and guidelines define technical specifications and standardized requirements to ensure a building’s structural stability, accessibility, and energy efficiency, among others. Today, checking the compliance with the applicable guidelines is an iterative, manual process which is based to a large extent on 2D drawings. In consequence, this process is cumbersome, time-consuming and error-prone. With the increasing adoption of digital methods in the construction industry, most importantly Building Information Modeling (BIM), new technologies are available to improve and partially automate this process. In a BIM-based construction project, digital models that include 3D geometric as well as semantic information comprehensively describe the building to be erected across the different involved disciplines. This rich information provides an excellent basis for automating the code compliance checking process. With Automated Code Compliance Checking, not only a higher degree of compliance with the different regulations can be achieved, but also a significant reduction of effort is possible. The chapter first discusses the major challenges of Automated Code Compliance Checking. Subsequently, representative available software solutions are presented and current research activities are discussed. Finally, an outlook for the development of code compliance checking in the construction industry is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BCA Singapore. (2013). Singapore BIM Guide – Version 2. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetz, J., van Leeuwen, J., & de Vries, B. (2009). IfcOWL: A case of transforming EXPRESS schemas into ontologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • buildingSMART. (2016a). BCF Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/bcf-releases. Accessed 13 May 2016.

  • buildingSMART. (2016b). Regulatory Room. Retrieved from http://buildingsmart.org/standards/standards-organization/rooms/regulatory-room/. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.

  • Dimyadi, J., & Amor, R. (2013). Automated building code compliance checking – Where is it at? In Proceedings of CIB WBC 2013 (pp. 172–185).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C. (2009). Automated assessment of early concept designs. Architectural Design, 79, 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C., Lee, J., Jeong, Y., & Lee, J. (2009). Automatic rule-based checking of building designs. Automation in Construction, 18(8), 1011–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. (2005). Natural language, semantic analysis and interactive fiction. Oxford: St Anne’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. D. (1996). Why can’t CAD be more like Lego? CKB, a program for building construction kits. Automation in Construction, 5, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSA. (2007). BIM guide for spatial program validation GSA BIM guide series 02. Retrieved from http://www.gsa.gov/bim/. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.

  • Hjelseth, E. (2015). Public BIM-based model checking solutions: Lessons learned from Singapore and Norway (Vol. 149, pp. 421–436). Retrieved from http://library.witpress.com/viewpaper.asp?pcode=BIM15-035-1. Accessed 07 Jan 2018.

  • Hjelseth, E., & Nisbet, N. (2011). Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up RASE methodology. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of CIB W78 (pp. 26–28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Invicara. (2016). BIM Assure. Retrieved from http://bimassure.com/. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.

  • Jotne EPM Technology. (2016). About Jotne IT. Retrieved from http://www.epmtech.jotne.com/about-jotne-it. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.

  • Kulusjärvi, H. (2012). Common BIM Requirements (COBIM) – Part 6 Quality Assurance. Retrieved from http://www.en.buildingsmart.kotisivukone.com/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. K. (2011). Building Environment Rule and Analysis (BERA) Language. Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Lee, J. K., Park, S., & Kim, I. (2016). Translating building legislation into a computer-executable format for evaluating building permit requirements. Automation in Construction, 71, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawari, N. O. (2018). Building information modeling: Automated code checking and compliance processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, N., Wix, J., & Conover, D. (2009). The future of virtual construction and regulation checking. In P. S. Brandon & T. Kocatürk (Ed.), Virtual futures for design, construction & procurement. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • NS 11001-1. (2009). Universal design of building works – Part 1: Buildings open to the public. Oslo: Norwegian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAS 1192-2. (2013). Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling. London: British Standards Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preidel, C., & Borrmann, A. (2015). Automated code compliance checking based on a visual language and building information modeling. Oulu: ISARC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preidel, C., & Borrmann, A. (2016). Integrating relational algebra into a visual code checking language for information retrieval from building information models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE), Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, D. M., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2016). Semantic text classification for supporting automated compliance checking in construction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(1), 04014106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solibri. (2016). Solibri Model Checker. Retrieved from http://www.solibri.com/solibri-model-checker-v9-1-available-today/. Accessed 08 Mar 2016.

  • Solihin, W., & Eastman, C. (2015). Classification of rules for automated BIM rule checking development. Automation in Construction, 53, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. K. Building Regulations. (2007). UK Fire Code Part B4: Fire safety. Newcastle upon Tyne: NBS, Part of the RIBA Enterprises Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhm, M., Lee, G., Park, Y., Kim, S., Jung, J., & Lee, J. K. (2015). Requirements for computational rule checking of requests for proposals (RFPs) for building designs in South Korea. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 602–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15, 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wix, J., & Espedokken, K. (2004). Building code and code checking developments in the UK and Norway. Singapore: Vendor ITM User (VIU) Presentations. 2 Nov 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, R. (2001). Code checking and visualization of an architecture design. Austin: IEEE Visualization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2015). Automated information transformation for automated regulatory compliance checking in construction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(4), B4015001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2016). Semantic NLP-based information extraction from construction regulatory documents for automated compliance checking. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(2), 04015014–04015014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelius Preidel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Preidel, C., Borrmann, A. (2018). BIM-Based Code Compliance Checking. In: Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., Beetz, J. (eds) Building Information Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92861-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92862-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics