Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ISO 26000: A Brief Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ISO 26000 - A Standardized View on Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

It has become increasingly imperative for companies to include social responsibility actions in their general business strategies in order to differentiate themselves from competitors and gain the attention and admiration of consumers. In order to ensure the uniform application of social responsibility actions, regardless of the company, field of activity or geographical area, the International Organization for Standardization developed the ISO 26000 standard to control the impact that the decisions and activities of organizations might have on the environment and society. A distinctive feature of the standard is its complexity and broad applicability, so that it has been readily adopted and implemented by different private and public organizations.

In this paper, the authors investigate the literature dealing with the theoretical and practical dimensions of ISO 26000, as well as the connection between the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ISO 26000. The paper highlights the characteristics, applicability and success of the international standard. Analysis of the literature reveals that social responsibility has become increasingly popular with entrepreneurs and public organizations as they attach greater importance to various CSR actions which attract the attention of customers and gain their loyalty. The complexity of the ISO 26000 standard is the main reason for its adoption by companies in a variety of fields, with the expectation that it will be accepted on a much wider scale in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdirahman, Z. Z., Suavee, L., & Shiri, G. (2014). Analysing network effects of corporate social responsibility implementation in food small and medium enterprises. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 14(2), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsson, S., Isaksson, R., & Tosteby, J., (2010). Integrated management systems: Advantages, problems and possibilities. In: J. Martin (Ed.) 13th Toulon-Verona conference “Organisational excellence in services”. Coimbra, pp. 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, R. (2008). Assesing the role of CSR in outsourcing decisions. Journal of Information Sysmes Applied Research, 1(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzarova, M. A., & Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. R., & Croker, N. (2013). The relevance of the ISO26000 social responsibility issues to the Hong Kong construction industry. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Buiding, 13(3), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazillier, R., & Vauday, J. (2014). CSR into (new) perspective. Foresight, 16(2), 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belașcu, L., Baltador, L., Budac, C. (2012). ISO 26000 – Benefits, difficulties, questions. Proceedings of the international scientific conference, Eco-Trend 2010 (pp. 675–681). Târgu-Jiu: House Publisher Academia Brâncuși.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains – On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherapanukorn, V., & Focken, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability in Asian luxury hotels: Policies, practices and standards. Asian Social Science, 10(8), 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, P.-S., Tang, A. K. Y., & Yip, A. C. Y. (2016). Scale development and operationalization of social responsibility constructs: An ISO 26000 context. Business and Economic Research, 6(2), 156–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporate Excellence. (2011). A new common framework for corporate social responsibility: The international standard ISO 26000. Retrieved October 29, 2017, from http://www.corporateexcellence.org/index.php/eng/Sharing-Knowledge/A-New-Standard-for-CSR-ISO-26000

  • Dabija, D. C., Pop, N. A., & Postelnicu, C. (2016). Ethics of the garment retail within the context of globalization and sustainable development. Industria Textilă, 67(4), 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankova, P., Valeva, M., & Strukelj, T. (2014). A comparative analysis of international corporate social responsibility standards as enterprise policy/governance innovation guidelines. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath, G. C., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2015). Implementation of 7 core principles of ISO 26000 (CSR) in Bangladesh: A case study on Grameenphone. Daffodil International University Journal of Business and Economics, 9(1), 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, E. C., Valcarcel, M., & Simonet, B. M. (2013). The social responsibility of nanoscience and nanotechnology: An integral approach. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecologia. (2011). Handbook for implementers of ISO 26000, global guidance standard on social responsibility. Middlebury Vermont: Creative Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, I. R. (2012). ISO standards, environmental management systems, and ecosystem services. Environmental Quality Management, 10, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formankova, S., Hrdlickova, A., Kucerova, R., & Skypalova, R. (2017). Evaluation of the applicability of CSR standards in the praxis of tertiary education institutions. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(1), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K., & Teramoto, Y. (2009). Understanding Japanese CSR: The reflections of managers in the field of global operations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueorguiev, T., & Krasteva, M. (2014). Social responsibility as a means for sustainable development in the lower Danube River basin. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 4(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (2013). ISO 26000 and the standardization of strategic management processes for sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Weidtmann, C. (2012). Transnational governance, deliberative democracy, and the legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analysing the case of a global multistakeholder process. Business & Society, 55(1), 90–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernaez, O., Zugasti, I., Waltersdorfer, G., Matev, D., Assenova, M., Jonkute, G., Staniskis, J., Schoenfelder, T., Bogataj, M., Moller, J.D., Hirsbak, S., Schmidt, K., Christiansen, K., Fondevila, M., & Arenda, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility on SMEs. 15th European roundtable on sustainable consumption and production. Bregenz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koszewska, M. (2010). CSR standards as a significant factor differentiating textile and clothing goods. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 18(6), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krukowska, M. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in Japanese companies. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 22(4), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew, P. Y., & Luetge, C. (2016). Integrated management systems frameworks for corporate social responsibility and related concepts. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(3), 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazjin, B. & Reveret, J.-P., (2015). Life cycle sustainability assessment: A tool for exercising due diligence in life cycle management. In: G. Sonnenmann, M. Margi (Eds.),7th International conference on life cycle management (LCM) (pp. 51–63). Bordeaux: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missimer, M., Robert, K.H., Broman, G. (2014). A systems perspective on ISO 26000. In 2nd international symposium “Systems thinking for a sustainbable economy. Advancements in economic and managerial theory and practice”. Rome: Univesitas Mercatorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mureșan, L. (2016). Ethical instruments for the development of the social responsibility of the business operators in Romania. Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Brașov, 9(58), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, C. C. (2017). Social responsibility and ethical decisions - a presentation of elements contained in ISO 26000:2010, guidance on social responsibility. Quality – Access to Success, 18(158), 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otova, M. & Stankova, E., (2011). The preparedness of certain companies to implement the ISO 26000 standard. In: Kocourek, A., Ortova, M., Mysakova, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th international conference. Liberec Economic Forum 2011 (pp. 372–381). Liberec: Technical University of Liberec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persic, A., & Markic, M. (2013). The impact of social responsibility vision and strategy on successful corporate operations. Managing Global Transitions, 11(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0312.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Diana Iulia Popa & Dan-Cristian Dabija

Authors
  1. Diana Iulia Popa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan-Cristian Dabija
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan-Cristian Dabija .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Guildhall Faculty of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, UK

    Samuel O. Idowu

  2. Economics & Business Administration, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania

    Catalina Sitnikov

  3. Antwerp Management School, NHTV Breda University of Applied Science, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lars Moratis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Popa, D.I., Dabija, DC. (2019). ISO 26000: A Brief Literature Review. In: Idowu, S.O., Sitnikov, C., Moratis, L. (eds) ISO 26000 - A Standardized View on Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92651-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation