Abstract
In his Reification. A New Look at an Old Idea (2008), Axel Honneth attempts to positively draw on Lukács’s theory of reification and to reinterpret it in the frame of the theory of recognition he has been developing since the beginning of the 1990s. As the content of the book is very rich, in this chapter I confine myself to dealing with two main questions: firstly, whether Honneth’s interpretation of Lukács is plausible and, secondly, to what extend Lukács’s critical theory can be helpful in pointing out the limits of Honneth’s theory of reification itself. In order to answer the first question, I examine Honneth’s critique of what he calls Lukács’s “official version” of the theory of reification, which he connects with the idealist philosophy of identity. Then I turn to Honneth’s interpretation of the “unofficial version” of Lukács’s concept of reification which he reconstructs in recognition-theoretical terms as the “forgetfulness of recognition.” Finally, I proceed to answer the above question by deploying Lukács’s theory to summarize some of the dispersed critiques of Honneth’s theory of reification that have been formulated in the relevant bibliography. From a Lukácsian point of view Honneth’s anthropological conceptualization of reification itself appears as reified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Selected Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor W. (1973) Negative Dialectics. Translated by E.B. Ashton. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Adorno, Theodor W. (2011) Philosophie und Soziologie (1960). Nachgelassene Schriften. Edited by Dirk Braunstein. Vol. IV.6. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Arato, Andrew and Paul Breines (1979) The Young Lukács and the Origins of Western Marxism. London: Pluto Press.
Beiersdörfer, Kurt (1986) Max Weber und Georg Lukács. Über die Beziehung von verstehender Soziologie und westlichem Marxismus. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
Braunstein, Dirk (2011) Adornos Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Cerutti, Furio (1970) “Hegel, Lukács, Korsch. Zum dialektischen Selbstverständnis des kritischen Marxismus.” In Oskar Negt (ed.) Aktualität und Folgen der Philosophie Hegels. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 195–210.
Chari, Anita (2010) “Toward a Political Critique of Reification. Lukács, Honneth and the Aims of Critical Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 36, no. 5: 587–606.
Dannemann, Rüdiger (2008) “Verdinglichung, Entfremdung und Anerkennung. Zwischenüberlegungen zu den Bedingungen der Möglichkeit, eine radikale Gegenwartstheorie zu reformulieren.” In Christoph J. Bauer, Britta Caspers, Niklas Hebing, Werner Jung and Holger Wendt (eds.) Georg Lukács. Werk und Wirkung. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr, 91–107.
Feenberg, Andrew (2011) “Rethinking Reification.” In Timothy Bewes and Timothy Hall (eds.) Georg Lukács: The Fundamental Dissonance of Existence. London and New York: Continuum, 101–120.
Feenberg, Andrew (2014) The Philosophy of Praxis. Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School. London and Brooklyn: Verso.
Goldmann, Lucien (1966) “Die Verdinglichung.” In Lucien Goldmann, Dialektische Untersuchungen. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 71–120.
Grondin, Jean (1988) “Reification from Lukács to Habermas.” In Tom Rockmore (ed.) Lukács Today. Essays in Marxist Philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 86–107.
Habermas, Jürgen (1971) “Literaturbericht zur philosophischen Diskussion um Marx und den Marxismus (1957).” In Jürgen Habermas, Theorie und Praxis. Sozialphilosophische Studien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 387–463.
Habermas, Jürgen (1991) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1 (Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Translated by Th. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, Timothy (2011a) “Returning to Lukács: Honneth’s Critical Reconstruction of Lukács’ Concepts of Reification and Praxis.” In Michael J. Thompson (ed.) Lukács Reconsidered. Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy and Aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum, 195–210.
Hall, Timothy (2011b) “Justice and the Good Life in Lukács’s History and Class Consciousness”. In Timothy Bewes and Timothy Hall (eds.) Georg Lukács: The Fundamental Dissonance of Existence. Aesthetics, Politics, Literature. London and New York: Continuum, 121–137.
Henning, Christoph (2012) “Von der Kritik warenförmiger Arbeit zur Apotheose der Marktgesellschaft.” In Hans Friese, Christian Lotz, Jakob Meier and Markus Wolf (eds.) Ding und Verdinglichung. Technik- und Sozialphilosophie nach Heidegger und der Kritischen Theorie. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 243–272.
Honneth, Axel (1999) “Reflexionen über den Klassiker des philosophischen Marxismus und das Schattenreich der philosophischen Kultur.” Interview by Rüdiger Dannemann. Lukács 1998/99. Jahrbuch der Internationalen Georg-Lukács-Gesellschaft, vol. 3: 73–89.
Honneth, Axel (2007) Disrespect. The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
Honneth, Axel (2008) Reification. A New Look at an Old Idea, ed. Martin Jay. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Honneth, Axel (2014) Freedom’s Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno (1985) “Diskussion über Dialektik (1939?).” In Max Horkheimer, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 12, ed. Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, Frankfurt: Fischer, 526–541.
Jaeggi, Rahel (1999) “Verdinglichung – ein aktueller Begriff?” Lukács 1998/99. Jahrbuch der Internationalen Georg-Lukács-Gesellschaft, vol. 3: 68–72.
Jütten, Timo (2010) “What Is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, vol. 53, no. 3: 235–256.
Jütten, Timo (2011) “Verdinglichung und Freiheit.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 59, no. 5: 717–730.
Kavoulakos, Konstantinos (2011) “Back to History? Reinterpreting Lukács’ Early Marxist Work in Light of the Antinomies of Contemporary Critical Theory.” In Michael J. Thompson (ed.) Lukács Reconsidered. Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy and Aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum, 151–171.
Kavoulakos, Konstantinos (2014) Ästhetizistische Kulturkritik und ethische Utopie. Georg Lukács’ Neukantianisches Frühwerk. Berlin and Boston: Akademie Verlag (De Gruyter).
Kavoulakos, Konstantinos (forthcoming, 2018) Georg Lukács’s Philosophy of Praxis. From Neo-Kantianism to Marxism. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Kettner, Fabian (2002) “Die Theorie der Verdinglichung und die Verdinglichung der Theorie.” Lukács 2002. Jahrbuch der Internationalen Georg-Lukács-Gesellschaft, vol. 6: 97–114.
Lukács, Georg (1971) History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1973) Adventures of the Dialectic. Translated by Joseph Bien. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Neuhouser, Frederick (2006) “Axel Honneth: Verdinglichung.” Notre Dame. Philosophical Reviews (March 7). Accessed June 11, 2015. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24979-verdinglichung/.
Pippin, Robert (2014) “Reconstructivism: On Honneth’s Hegelianism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 40, no. 8: 725–741.
Quadflieg, Dirk (2011) “Zur Dialektik von Verdinglichung und Freiheit. Von Lukács zu Honneth – und zurück zu Hegel.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 59, no. 5: 701–715.
Stahl, Titus (2011) “Verdinglichung als Pathologie zweiter Ordnung.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 59, no. 5: 731–746.
Stahl, Titus (2012) “Verdinglichung und Herrschaft. Technikkritik als Kritik sozialer Praxis.” In Hans Friesen, Christian Lotz, Jakob Meier and Markus Wolf (eds.) Ding und Verdinglichung: Technik- und Sozialphilosophie nach Heidegger und der Kritischen Theorie. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 299–324.
Strydom, Piet (2013) “Review Essay: Honneth’s Sociological Turn.” European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 16, no. 4: 530–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kavoulakos, K. (2019). Reifying Reification: A Critique of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Reification. In: Schmitz, V. (eds) Axel Honneth and the Critical Theory of Recognition. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91980-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91980-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91979-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91980-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)