Skip to main content

“Wherever We Would Go, We Would Be Together” The Challenges for Queer Refugee Couples Claiming Joint Asylum in Canada

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
LGBTI Asylum Seekers and Refugees from a Legal and Political Perspective
  • 1220 Accesses

Abstract

Scholars note that immigration in North America and Western Europe has been heavily regulated by heteronormative and patriarchal norms which have historically denied immigration to lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) couples. While the research regarding how LGBTQ individuals navigate the immigration process in Canada has increased, there remains little investigation into the asylum experiences of LGBTQ couples who file jointly. This is a serious oversight, as a significant number of asylum claims are joint claims by LGBTQ refugee couples. This chapter questions the reasoning behind the challenges to queer refugee couples’ claims during the migration and asylum process and argues that it is the intersection of gender and sexuality behind the vulnerability of queer asylum claimants both within their countries of origin and when they are seeking asylum. The chapter focuses on narratives of two queer refugee couples who made joint claims in Vancouver, British Columbia. I follow their experiences prior to migrating to Canada through their asylum hearing. Their stories reveal underlying heteronormative and culturally-biased institutional and social barriers LGBTQ refugee couples face in escaping persecution and having both their relationships and need for asylum recognized by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I use the term significant partners to refer to individuals who have a sexual and/or romantic relationship together.

  2. 2.

    All names have been changed.

  3. 3.

    I do not list nor name explicitly the participants’ country of origin in order to protect their confidentiality. This means that I cannot give specific statistics, such as reported crimes or population numbers because it would run the risk of identifying the specific country.

  4. 4.

    Rainbow Refugee is a volunteer organization based in Vancouver, B.C. that works to assist those claiming asylum in Canada on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and HIV status. I have volunteered as a settlement worker for Rainbow Refugee for more than 3 years. My work involves reaching out to asylum seekers, guiding them through the asylum process, helping them find needed resources, serving as an expert witness for asylum hearings, writing letters of support, and serving as an observer for their hearings. For more information on Rainbow Refugee: http://www.rainbowrefugee.ca/.

  5. 5.

    Trans refers to individuals who do not associate or identify themselves with the gender assigned to them at birth. Trans is an umbrella term for gender nonconforming and gender variant individuals.

  6. 6.

    This research focuses on only those that make asylum claims within Canada (in-state), instead of those claiming out of state at a United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and then being relocated to Canada.

  7. 7.

    Heteronormativity refers to the assumption that individuals are naturally heterosexual and that most individuals are heterosexual. Heterosexuality is seen as the norm. Those who are not heterosexual are seen as deviant.

  8. 8.

    Claimants coming from DCOs can still make appeals in the Canadian Federal Court; however, the process is much longer and the success rate is not high.

  9. 9.

    I deliberately use the term undocumented rather than illegal. in this research because it allows me to problematize the way that the Canadian state places migratory individuals into categories of legitimacy and non-legitimacy. Undocumented also allows me to show the heterogeneity of migration and break apart the essentialized and racist depiction of the illegal migrant. By taking a political stance in using the term undocumented, I am saying that migration in itself is not illegal. It is the Canadian state that determines and regulates who can settle legally. This regulation is based on a hierarchy of racial, class, and gender norms as well as the global apartheid of migration that allows the mobility of some and creates immobility for others (De Genova 2010).

  10. 10.

    For more information about First Contact, please visit the Red Cross’s website: http://www.redcross.ca/how-we-help/migrant-and-refugee-services/first-contact/first-contact-vancouver.

References

  • Andrijasevic, R. (2009). Sex on the move: Gender, subjectivity and differential inclusion. Subjectivity, 29, 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atak, I., Hudson, G., & Nakache, D. (2018). The securitisation of Canada’s refugee system: Reviewing the unintended consequences of the 2012 reform. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 37(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, K. (2016). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. (2014). Refugee hotels: The discourse of hospitality and the rise of immigration detention in Canada. University of Toronto Quarterly, 83(4), 826–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. (2010). The queer politics of migration: Reflections on “illegality” and incorrigibility. Studies in Social Justice, 4(2), 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucher, M., & DeGagne, A. (2014). Guilty until proven persecuted: The Canadian state’s assessment of sexual minority refugee claimants and the invisibility of the non-Western sexual non-citizen. Social Politics, 23(20), 459–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, N. (2015). Challenges to assessing same-sex relationships under refugee law in Canada. McGill Law Journal, 60(3), 527–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantzi, M. (2015). ‘Stranger Danger’: A critical discourse analysis of the immigration and refugee protection act. Major Research Papers. Paper 6. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://scholars.wlu.ca/soci_mrp/6

  • Jordan, S. (2010). Un/settling: A critical ethnographic inquiry into settlement by refugees making claims based on sexual orientation or gender identity persecution. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0053652

  • Kahn, S. (2015). Cast out: “Gender role outlaws” seeking asylum in the West and the quest for social connections. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(1), 58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, S. (2011). Safe spaces for dykes in danger? Refugee law’s production of vulnerable lesbians. In S. FitzGerald (Ed.), Regulating the international movement of women: From protection to control (pp. 29–47). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaViolette, N. (2014). Sexual orientation, gender identity and the refugee determination process in Canada. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 4(2), 68–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2010). The cultural politics of lesbian asylum. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(3–4), 424–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2014). “Gay? Prove it”: The politics of queer anti-deportation activism. Sexualities, 17(8), 958–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, C., & Jordan, S. (2013). “On what grounds?” LGBTQ asylum claims in Canada. Forced Migration Review, 42, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. A. (2014). The challenge of home for sexual orientation and gendered identity refugees in Toronto. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes, 48(1), 132–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. (2017). The homonational archive: Sexual orientation and gendered identity refugee documentation in Canada and the USA. Ethnos, 82(3), 520–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, V. (2005). Homosexual or female-applying gender-based asylum jurisprudence to lesbian asylum claims. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 16, 417–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razack, S. (Ed.). (2002). Race, space, and the law: Unmapping a white settler society. Toronto: Between the Lines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, D. (2017). Limbo life in Canada’s waiting room: asylum-seeker as queer subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2014). Archives of intimacy and trauma: Queer migration documents as technologies of affect. Radical History Review, 120, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilets, J. D. (1997). Conceptualizing private violence against sexual minorities as gendered violence: An international and comparative perspective. Albany Law Review, 60, 990–1049.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Fobear .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fobear, K. (2019). “Wherever We Would Go, We Would Be Together” The Challenges for Queer Refugee Couples Claiming Joint Asylum in Canada. In: Güler, A., Shevtsova, M., Venturi, D. (eds) LGBTI Asylum Seekers and Refugees from a Legal and Political Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91904-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91905-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics