Skip to main content

Legal Requirements to Prove Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation: A Comparison Between the CJEU and ECtHR Case Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
LGBTI Asylum Seekers and Refugees from a Legal and Political Perspective
  • 1283 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the proposed reform of the Common European Asylum System in 2016, European Union legislation still remains silent on which methods should be used to prove asylum claims based on sexual orientation. The author identifies some problematic cases, in which selected European Union countries face problems with assessing the credibility of lesbian, gay and bisexual asylum seekers. One of them is Czech Republic, where a controversial practice of phallometric tests was recently used to prove homosexuality, although the practice was supposed to be abandoned. The chapter further compares the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union with case law of European Court of Human Rights in this area to identify the most common challenges. It aims to question whether the two courts result effective in clarifying which practices are admissible in asylum proceedings and which methods should be prohibited, as they may violate asylum seekers’ basic human rights. The author argues that there are significant contradictions in the judgements of the two courts, which cause problems both to the decision makers and asylum seekers and that it is urgently needed to adopt and implement common European guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter focuses only on asylum applications based on sexual orientation (lodged by lesbians, gays and bisexuals) and is not dealing with asylum applications based on gender identity (transgender and intersex applicants), as there is a lack of information and cases concerning these applicants. The chapter is based on legal situation as of 25 January 2018.

References

Case Law

  • A, B and C v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, C-148/13 to C-150/13(2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann v. France, No. 33592/96 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Y and Z, C-71/11 and C-99/11 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Case of Ireland v. The United Kingdom, No. 5310/71 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic, No. 57325/00 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. v. Spain, No. 13273/16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal, C-473/16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKSC 31 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalloh v. Germany, No. 54810/00(2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence et al. v. Texas, United States Supreme Court (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.B. v. Spain, No. 15109/15 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.K.N. v Sweden, No. 72413/10 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.T. v. France, No. 61145/16, lodged on 25 October 2016, communicated on 22 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • ME v. Sweden, No. 71398/12 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v X, Y and Z, C-199/12 to C-201/12 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • N.E.E. v. Ministerstvo vnitra, 5 Azs 53/2016 – 26(2016). http://www.nssoud.cz/files/SOUDNI_VYKON/2016/0053_5Azs_1600026_20160823134605_prevedeno.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nangnou v. Spain, No. 16370/15. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1845816-resolucion-del-tribunal-de-estrasburgo-que.html#document/p2. Accessed 29 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasser Mustapha Karouni v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, No. 02-72651(2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • O.S. v. Switzerland, No. 43987/16, lodged on 22 July 2016, communicated on 29 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opinion of Advocate General Wahl (2017), Case C-473/16, F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmouni v. France, No. 25803/94 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwaltungsgericht (2009). Verwaltungsgericht Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, judgement of 7 September 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worwa v. Poland, No. 26624/95 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mrazova, A. (2019). Legal Requirements to Prove Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation: A Comparison Between the CJEU and ECtHR Case Law. In: Güler, A., Shevtsova, M., Venturi, D. (eds) LGBTI Asylum Seekers and Refugees from a Legal and Political Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91904-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91905-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics