Skip to main content

Suture Zones as Upper Crustal Seismogenerating Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Hazards and Risk Research in Russia

Abstract

For the upper crust seismicity, the tectonic nature of earthquakes plays an important role. The allocation of zones of origin of earthquake focus (OEF zones) should be based on the tracing and typification of seismogenerating structures (SGS), the main of which are the suture zones. Dangerous for the construction, SGS zones belong to the upper seismically active layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nesmeyanov, S. A. (2004). Engineering geotectonics. Russia: Science 780 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Milanovsky, E. E. (1983). Riftogenesis in the history of the Earth (rifting on ancient platforms). Russia: Nedra 280 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nesmeyanov, S. A., & Barkhatov, I. I. (1978). The newest and seismogenerating structures of the Western Gissar-Alai. Russia: Science 120 p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chedia, O. K. (1986). Morphostructure and the newest tectogenesis of the Tien-Shan. Russia: Ilim 314 p.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Milanovsky, E. E. (1968). The newest tectonics of the Caucasus. Russia: Nedra 484 p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lilienberg, D. A., Budagov, B. A., & Aliev, A. S. (1996). Morphotectonics of Azerbaijan and Eastern Transcaucasia from the standpoint of neo-mobility. Geomorphology, 4, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voeykova, O. A., Nesmeyanov, S. A., & Serebryakova, L. I. (2007). Neotectonics and active ruptures of Sakhalin. Russia: Science 186 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nesmeyanov, S. A., Lyutikov, A. I., Voeykova, O. A., & Dontsova, G. Y. (2011). Seismicity of the northern part of Russian plate and its its glaciostatic nature. Water Resources, 38(7), 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garetsky, R. G., Aizberg, R. E., Karabanov, A. K., et al. (1999). The newest tectonics and geodynamics of Central Europe. Geotectonics, 5, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yudakhin, F. N., Shchukin, Y. K., & Makarov, V. I. (2003). Deep structure and modern geodynamic processes in the lithosphere of the East European platform. Russia: UrB RAS 300 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milanovsky, E. E. (1987). Geology of the USSR. Part 1. Russia: MGU 416 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Earthquakes and microseismicity in the tasks of modern geodynamics of the East European platform. (2007). Book. 1: Earthquakes. Russia. Petrozavodsk. KSC RAS. 391p.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seismotectonics of plates of ancient platforms in the field of quaternary glaciations. (2009). Russia: Book and Business. 288 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nesmeyanov, S., Voeykova, O. (2019). Suture Zones as Upper Crustal Seismogenerating Structures. In: Svalova, V. (eds) Natural Hazards and Risk Research in Russia. Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91833-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics