Skip to main content

‘It’s the Economy, Stupid’: Politico-Economic Theories and Cinematic Language in The Big Short

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Interplay Between Political Theory and Movies

Abstract

In this chapter, Nesselhauf analyses how films not only adopt a theory with regard to content but also, on a second level, how aesthetics and the narration of a film are (loosely or explicitly) based on a theory, or rather, how the ‘cinematic language’ correlates with the theoretical basis. After a general introduction to film narration, this interplay is outlined using the example of politico-economic theories in Adam McKay’s The Big Short (2015), a movie about the key events and figures of the US housing bubble of the early 2000s, resulting in the recent worldwide financial crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While the distinction between ‘story’ and ‘plot’ goes back to E.M. Forster’s Aspects of the Novel (1927) (cf. Forster 2005, 87), there are various other terms in literary criticism basically meaning the same, for instance, ‘fabula’ and ‘sjuzet’, as used by Russian formalists and structuralists such as Vladimir Propp or Boris Tomashevsky (cf. Culler 1981, 169ff.), ‘histoire’ and ‘discours’, introduced by Tzvetan Todorov (cf. Todorov 1966, 126f.) and later adopted by Gérard Genette (cf. Genette 1980, 27) or—as a hybrid terminology—‘story’ and ‘discourse’ as used by Seymour Chatman (1978, 19f.).

  2. 2.

    The story includes Emma’s life, basically from her birth until her marriage with George Knightley as the ‘happy ending’ of the novel.

  3. 3.

    The novel starts with her being 21 years old, but includes flashbacks (analepsis) and information on her earlier life, as well as foreshadowings (prolepsis).

  4. 4.

    Here, I use the terminology by French literary theorist Gérard Genette (cf. Genette 1980, 212ff.).

  5. 5.

    The concept of ‘unreliable narration’ was first introduced by American literary scholar Wayne C. Booth in his influential study The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961) and can, for example, be found when the homodiegetic narrator is a child (due to his/her limited knowledge and sense of the world), an elderly (due to a possible temporal distance to the events), as well as addicted to drugs, abusing medication or in psychological treatment (due to a restricted perception and a mental incapacity).

  6. 6.

    This (simplified) model could be expanded by considering further (computer-generated) visual and digital effects added in post-production or a (rather rare) voice-over narrator.

  7. 7.

    We already mentioned the music before as part of the ‘cinematic narrator’, since the score (usually instrumental music) and the soundtrack (songs) can be understood as both a narrative device advancing the plot and an additional aesthetic feature.

  8. 8.

    For further reading, I recommend the following introductions to film narratology and film aesthetics: Bordwell (2008), Bordwell and Thompson (2012), Chatman (1978), Kuhn (2011) and Verstraten (2009).

  9. 9.

    There are also examples in which the narrative contradicts the aesthetic level or vice versa, usually in order to create humour or irony—for example, in the pilot episode of the HBO television series The Sopranos (1999–2007) when Tony Soprano tells his psychologist about an incident with a debtor (‘We Had Coffee’; S1.E1 00:10:07) and the inserted flashback shows how Tony actually knocked him down.

  10. 10.

    This interplay is, obviously, rather an exception and a rare special case, since the majority of novels and films fictionalise a theoretical concept with regard to content but without such a ‘double’ layer of both the content and the ‘cinematic language’. So, for instance, M. Night Shyamalan’s movie The Happening (2008) actually picks up the biological principle of a mode of communication between plants, but does not transfer this to the level of film aesthetics.

  11. 11.

    After Whoops! Why Everyone Owes Everyone and No One Can Pay (2010), Lanchester has even published a second non-fiction book, How to Speak Money: What the Money People Say—And What It Really Means (2014), since.

  12. 12.

    These are the names used in the film version; the character of Jared Vennett is actually based on Greg Lippmann; Mark Baum can be traced back to the actual hedge-fund manager Steve Eisman; and Charlie Ledley and Jamie Mai actually cooperated with Ben Hockett. Other than the film version, Lewis’ non-fiction book maintains the actual names throughout up to the acknowledgements (cf. Lewis 2015, 270).

  13. 13.

    The film version used here is the unedited DVD version from 2016 (125 min.; 2.40:1 letterbox ratio). This first text insert picks up the film’s tagline, ‘This is a true story’. Such annunciations obviously raise certain viewer expectations, although some movies play with this filmic convention, for instance, Joel and Ethan Coen’s Fargo (1996).

  14. 14.

    This commission, appointed by the US government and under the direction of former California State Treasurer Phil Angelides, submitted its final report in January 2011.

  15. 15.

    Interestingly, Margot Robbie already starred in Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street, another critically acclaimed blockbuster film about the recent financial crisis released 2 years before.

  16. 16.

    The projection that only the wealthiest 1% of world population holds the vast majority of economic capital and political power influenced the 2011 ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement and coined the slogan ‘We are the 99%’.

  17. 17.

    Ben Rickert sells their CDS to Swiss UBS during his vacation, sitting in a pub in England (01:42:44); shortly afterwards, Michael Burry (01:44:11) and finally Mark Baum (01:58:08) sell their positions as well.

  18. 18.

    For further reading, I recommend the following historical and economic introductions: Aliber and Kindleberger (2015), Bachelier (2000), Chancellor (2010), Galbraith (2009), Kindleberger (1973), Martin (2002), Oelßner (1949) and Plumpe (2012).

  19. 19.

    For instance, the bankers of several investment banks selling CDOs to Burry (00:19:01; 00:21:45; 00:22:00; 00:22:23) or the mortgage brokers (00:49:03; 01:53:00; 01:53:34) on the one side, as well as house owners (00:42:24; 01:53:08) or credit receivers (00:51:49) on the other. This is in accordance to Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory approach ‘Who and what cannot be paid will be forgotten’ (‘Wer nicht zahlen kann und was nicht bezahlt werden kann, wird vergessen’; Luhmann 2012, 19). The only (and thereby noticeable) exception is the ‘CDO manager’ Baum meets in Las Vegas (01:19:32), a brutally calculating person who is characterised by his sole greed, but at the end also stays a ‘flat character’.

  20. 20.

    Here, Weber quotes from Franklin’s ‘Advice to a Young Tradesman, Written by an Old One’ (1748).

  21. 21.

    For example, when Baum visits a strip club to talk to a female dancer (00:51:14)

  22. 22.

    For further reading, I recommend the following historical and economic introductions: Freud (2007), Le Bon (2013), Kahneman and Tversky (1979), Mackey (2001) and Thaler and Sunstein (2008).

  23. 23.

    This narrative technique is called ‘breaking the fourth wall’ and goes back to the theatre where the (inexistent) fourth wall is open towards the audience. Directly addressing the viewer also breaks the ‘pact of fiction’, the unofficial agreement between the audience and the play or film regarding its own fictionality and the figures as actors. In ‘threatening’ this illusion, the narrative device of breaking the fourth wall cannot be used in every genre, since it displays the process of narration and thereby metafictionally deconstructs the work of art itself. It is important to stress that such a breaking of the fourth wall and directly addressing the viewer takes place without the other fictional characters taking notice, for instance, when Vennett as part of an audience turns to the camera during a lecture (01:11:32). Besides Vennett as the narrator of the film himself, only Vinnie, a member of Baum’s team (00:26:14), the ‘math specialist’ Jiang (00:30:35) and Shipley/Geller (00:38:39; 01:17:30) also break the fourth wall, interestingly each time in order to interrupt or even contradict Vennett.

  24. 24.

    Such discrepancies can also be found in other scenes, for instance, when Vennett’s statement that there may be ‘definitely some interest’ in the CDS trade is followed by a collage of eight negative responses cut together to a short sequence of less than 7 seconds (00:28:11).

  25. 25.

    For instance, sequences involving Geller, Shipley and Rickert, whose trading activities are independent from Vennett after all.

  26. 26.

    During the first appearance of the main figures, their names are inserted, for instance, when Mark Baum (00:05:06) or Richard Thaler (01:22:38) is introduced. Throughout the film, there are also inserts of short definitions, for example, of ‘tranches’ (00:29:05) or ‘CDOs’ (00:32:10), as well as drawings (00:25:26), which are all constituent of a certain postmodern film aesthetics.

  27. 27.

    The film itself is split in three sections, each one introduced by a paradigmatic motto, firstly a quote by Mark Twain (00:00:49), later an anonymous statement ‘overheard at a Washington, D.C. bar’ (00:59:18) as well as a quote from Haruki Murakami’s novel 1Q84 (01:30:37).

  28. 28.

    Music plays a very important role for and in the film, underlining the ‘MTV style’ already mentioned before. For instance, the Las Vegas scenes are introduced by a postcard-style collage of typical Vegas images, accompanied by the theme from Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musical The Phantom of the Opera (01:07:59), a rap song (01:08:22) and finally a song in the style of Rat Pack (01:08:34). Similarly, songs are chosen deliberately throughout the film in which there is a clear connection between a particular song and the scene, for instance, when the Gun n’ Roses’ song Sweet Child of Mine is used as background music for Vennett’s comment on the restaurant scene with Baum (01:22:10), the Gorillaz’ Feel Good Inc. for Rickert’s arrival in New York (00:58:02) or Ludacris’ Money Maker (as well as typical scenes from hip hop music videos) for Burry’s negotiations with several banks (00:20:59). Besides such usage of actual songs, background sounds and noises are equally interesting, for instance, when Baum’s discussion with the CDO manager is suddenly accompanied by a laugh track as known from television sitcoms (01:21:28).

  29. 29.

    Actually, the amount (‘fourty [sic!] seven million dollars’) is spelled wrong.

  30. 30.

    Marx also claims religious differences already (cf. Marx 1961, 107) and rudimentarily anticipates the later works of Max Weber.

  31. 31.

    As well from his ‘Advice to a Young Tradesman, Written by an Old One’ (1748).

  32. 32.

    This symbol can already be found in Michael Lewis’ book with regard to the trances (cf. exemplarily Lewis 2015, 140). In the film version, it is Jared Vennett using a Jenga tower out of wooden blocks to illustrate the principle of tranches (00:28:49).

  33. 33.

    In the additional DVD feature In the Tranches: Casting (00:14:32)

References

  • Aliber RZ, Kindleberger CP (2015) Manias, panics, and crashes. A history of financial crises. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austen J (2003) Emma. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelier L (2000) Théorie de la spéculation. Théorie mathématique du jeu. Jacques Gabay, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell D (2008) Narration in the fiction film. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell D, Thompson K (2012) Film art. An introduction. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor E (2010) Devil take the hindmost: a history of financial Speculation. Plume, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman S (1978) Story and discourse. Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell UP, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler J (1981) The pursuit of signs. Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. Cornell UP, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens C (2004) David Copperfield. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster EM (2005) Aspects of the novel. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (2007) Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. Fischer, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JK (2009) A short history of financial euphoria. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette G (1980) Narrative discourse. An essay in method. Cornell UP, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (2017) The general theory of employment, interest and money: with the economic consequences of the peace. Wordsworth, Ware

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger CP (1973) The world in depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M (2011) Filmnarratologie. Ein erzähltheoretisches Analysemodell. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon G (2013) Psychologie des foules. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M (2015) The Big Short. Inside the doomsday machine. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1984) Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft als autopoietisches System. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 13(4):308–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2012) Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay C (2001) Extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds. Wordsworth, Ware

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PN (2002) Die großen Spekulationen der Weltgeschichte. Vom Altertum zur New Economy. Langen-Müller, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1961) Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. MEW 13. Dietz, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelßner F (1949) Die Wirtschaftskrisen. Erster Band: Die Krisen im vormonopolistischen Kapitalismus. Dietz, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T, Smelser NJ (1998) Economy and society: a study in the integration of economic and social theory. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumpe W (2012) Wirtschaftskrisen. Geschichte und Gegenwart. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Say J-B (1972) Traité d’économie politique. Calman-Levy, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (2016) Die Großstädte des Geisteslebens. In: Simmel G (ed) Individualismus der modernen Zeit und andere soziologische Abhandlungen. Suhrkamp, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2004) The wealth of nations, Books IV–V. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale UP, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States (2011) https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-FCIC/pdf/GPO-FCIC.pdf

  • Todorov T (1966) Les catégories du récit littéraire. Communications 8:125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraten P (2009) Film narratolgy. Introduction to the theory of narrative. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2013) Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Nesselhauf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nesselhauf, J. (2019). ‘It’s the Economy, Stupid’: Politico-Economic Theories and Cinematic Language in The Big Short. In: Hamenstädt, U. (eds) The Interplay Between Political Theory and Movies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90731-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics