Skip to main content

Conclusion: Promising Partners or Strange Bedfellows? Faith-Based Providers and Government Funders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Arc of Faith-Based Initiatives

Abstract

Our volume has set out to examine the dynamics of social service delivery with a principal focus on faith-based organizations. Our qualitative and comparative approach has analyzed the contours of welfare service provision across different social service domains (family , housing, addiction recovery) , provider types (faith-intensive, faith-related, secular ), and locales (Mississippi , Michigan , and Washington -Oregon ). A consistent analytical theme has also been explored throughout this volume in the form of the three C’s of social service provision. Using what we called a layered case study approach, we have been mindful of programmatic content (service delivery dynamics), organizational culture (agency mission, values , etc.), and ecological context (community environment , religious landscape, etc.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Avishai (2008).

  2. 2.

    Bartkowski and Regis (2003).

  3. 3.

    Aron and Sharkey (2002).

  4. 4.

    Goggin and Orth (2002).

  5. 5.

    Campbell (2002), Lockhart (2005), Monsma (2004), Pipes and Ebaugh (2002).

  6. 6.

    Bartkowski and Regis (2003), Farnsley (2007), Unruh and Sider (2005), Wuthnow (2004).

  7. 7.

    For an excellent comparison of faith-based organizations across national contexts, see Clarke and Jennings (2008).

  8. 8.

    See Wineburg (2007), Sager (2010).

  9. 9.

    Nagel (2013).

  10. 10.

    Porter (2017).

  11. 11.

    One of our regrets is that, despite the wealth of agency-level data we were able to collect and analyze for this volume, securing interview data from program participants in sufficient numbers to warrant sustained analysis proved to be quite difficult and was restricted largely to Chap. 6. As work on this front continues, we hope that the insights that have emerged from our extensive interactions with social service workers can be complemented by an even wider range of perspectives—aspirations and frustrations alike—from those these programs are designed to serve. For an excellent treatment of recipients of faith-based services, see Chap. 6 of Wuthnow (2004).

References

  • Avishai, Orit. 2008. “Doing religion” in a secular world: Women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender & Society 22: 409–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P., and Helen A. Regis. 2003. Charitable choices: Religion, race, and poverty in the post-welfare era. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David. 2002. Beyond Charitable Choice: The diverse service delivery approaches of local faith-related organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31: 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Gerald, and Michael Jennings (eds.). 2008. Development, civil society and faith-based organizations: Bridging the sacred and the secular. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsley, Arthur E., III. 2007. Faith-Based Initiatives. Pp. 345–356 in The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by James A. Beckford and N.J. Demerath, III. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; Unruh and Sider 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, Malcolm L., and Deborah A. Orth. 2002. How Faith-Based and Secular Organizations Tackle Housing for the Homeless. Albany, N.Y.: Rockefeller Institute of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, William H. 2005. Building Bridges and Bonds: Generating Social Capital in Secular and Faith-Based Poverty-to-Work Programs. Sociology of Religion 66: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsma, Stephen V. 2004. Putting faith in partnerships: Welfare-to-work in four cities. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth. 2013. Agents, armies, allies: Semantics of public-private partnerships in US welfare reform. Journal of Religion in Europe 6: 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Tom. 2017. Deep state: How a conspiracy theory went from political fringe to mainstream. Newsweek. August 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, Paula F., and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2002. Faith-Based Coalitions, Social Services, and Government Funding. Sociology of Religion 2002: 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, Rebecca. 2010. Faith, politics, and power: The politics of faith-based initiatives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, Heidi Rolland, and Ronald J. Sider. 2005. Saving souls, serving society: Understanding the faith factor in church-based social ministry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, Bob. 2007. Faith-based inefficiency: The follies of Bush’s initiative. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert. 2004. Saving America? Faith-Based Services and the Future of Civil Society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Bartkowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bartkowski, J.P., Grettenberger, S.E. (2018). Conclusion: Promising Partners or Strange Bedfellows? Faith-Based Providers and Government Funders. In: The Arc of Faith-Based Initiatives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90668-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90668-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90667-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90668-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics