Skip to main content

Podcast Networks: Syndicating Production Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Podcasting

Abstract

This chapter investigates the much overlooked aspect of podcast networks in contemporary US podcast production culture. Emerging networks bring together individual podcasts and their producers under one organisation and make possible several inter-podcast practices. Based on interviews with executives of three newly formed podcast networks (The Heard, Radiotopia and Relay FM), their production cultures are reviewed in light of commodification models for cultural products. The chapter shows how, within the cultures of the podcast networks, the formation of these conglomerations is predominantly motivated by the advantages provided in terms of overcoming gatekeeping mechanisms, exploiting niche and longtail audiences, the exchange of social capital, and discoverability. As such, these motivations highlight a tension between podcasting’s promise of disruption and the mainstream/ commercial logic that reigns over podcasting production culture.

The author would like to thank Sarah Arnold, Linda Duits, Amanda Lotz and William Uricchio for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Since 2014, an increase in attention paid to podcasting has brought in new listeners and, promptly following, advertisers and venture capital. Nieman Lab has been providing consistent in-depth coverage on developments within the podcasting industry. See for instance Nicholas Quah’s Hot Pod newsletter (Doctor 2016a; Quah 2017).

  2. 2.

    Earlier US podcast networks are Rooster Teeth (founded in 2003) and This Week in Tech (founded in 2005). These networks, however, take the form of a multi-media production platform rather than focusing solely on audio productions. An example of a non-US network is The Podcast Network in Australia. For an overview of podcast production and distribution companies and their alliances see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_podcasting_companies. Accessed 27 March 2017.

  3. 3.

    To be clear: when talking about ‘radio’, I am talking about the institutionalized form of broadcast radio which usually uses freely accessible media to disseminate audio content in a one-to-many system (see Hilmes 2007; Peters 1999), whether this be online or via the airwaves. This excludes other forms of radio, such as police or traffic radio, and even new iterations such as RFID chips. The phenomenon of streaming ‘internet radio’, I would argue, should also be set apart from the technology of podcasting, predominantly because of delivery over RSS .

  4. 4.

    This lack of attention has been explicitly articulated in the Journal of Radio & Audio Media (2015, second issue), The Radio Journal – International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media (2016) and by Michele Hilmes (2013).

  5. 5.

    As we are speaking of gradual developments, we can see changes being set into motion earlier, for example in cable distribution and the introduction of the VCR and cassette tapes—see Hilmes (2007) and Uricchio (2004).

  6. 6.

    In each model, the financial transaction is arranged differently: publishers create material goods that carry cultural productions (such as books, albums, DVDs) which are sold directly to consumers. Flow logic is determined by the ability of an audio-visual product to create an audience that can be sold to advertisers. Finally, the logic of the written press combines the previous elements, for it creates an audience that should repeatedly buy a material product, such as a newspaper (Miège 1989: 12). Though related, the ‘flow model’ should not be confused with Raymond Williams’s more textual approach to the construction of flow in broadcast media (Williams 1990 [1975]; also Uricchio 2004).

  7. 7.

    I say ‘current’ because approaches with portals for (non-musical) audio content are being developed, see Doctor (2016b).

  8. 8.

    Despite the arrival of competitors, iTunes still accounts for 60 per cent of the total amount of podcasts downloaded (Doctor 2016a). Stitcher does offer a paid subscription service that offers premiums such as early listening , which only makes it a partial portal because parts of its content can be accessed freely but with advertisements.

  9. 9.

    A notable exception to this is Spotify, which since 2016 has been adding curated podcasts to their library based on these qualifications: ‘That appeal to millennials. That it’s evergreen content. That it’s tech oriented. That it’s storytelling’ (Lybsin 2016). Note that Spotify, like Stitcher , is a partial portal as its content can be accessed for free, but with advertisements.

  10. 10.

    Through this last ‘snowball’ type of connection The Heard was found via the Radiotopia respondent, for example.

  11. 11.

    Since The Heard did not have these numbers readily available, each individual producer was approached to share their overall download numbers in order to estimate network-wide reach. However, the producers were not able to provide the numbers either due to issues of confidentiality or the lack of technical expertise required to measure their reach. Reliable tracking of podcast audience numbers can be seen as an industry-wide problem, which was addressed by NPR directly in 2016 (NPR 2016).

  12. 12.

    Prior to the campaign for Radiotopia, Mars had successfully funded a couple of campaigns with the support of the 99% Invisible audience . Funding productions through listener support is neither a new nor an uncommon practice in the history of American public radio (see Loviglio 2013). In relation to Miège’s commodification models, the practice of financing through audiences falls within the publishing model and the written press model, since material products such as branded t-shirts are often obtained as reward for providing financial support. For more on the cultural practices surrounding fan-based support, see D’Amato (2014).

  13. 13.

    Of the three networks discussed in this chapter, Radiotopia is the most explicitly active on the popular audio publishing website Soundcloud. Besides publishing network -related audio stories exclusively, every individual podcast publishes their episodes on Soundcloud, which get promoted by Radiotopia’s account. See <https://soundcloud.com/radiotopia/tracks> accessed 14 February 2017.

  14. 14.

    Relay FM could not share reach or listener numbers for confidentiality reasons. In 2015 the network delivered about 1.5 million downloads per month (Dillet 2015).

  15. 15.

    Of course, there are more historical factors that produced the current form of broadcast radio, such as social and governmental factors. For an extensive overview, see Hilmes (2007).

Bibliography

  • Becker, H. (2008). Art worlds (25th anniversary ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. Originally published in 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. (2006). Will the iPod kill the radio star? Profiling podcasting as radio. Convergence, 12(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. (2016). Podcasting: Considering the evolution of the medium and its association with the word “radio”. The Radio Journal – International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cwynar, C. (2015). More than a “VCR for radio”: The CBC, the radio 3 podcast, and the uses of an emerging medium. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 22(2), 190–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, F. (2014). Investors and patrons, gatekeepers and social capital: Representations and experiences of fans’ participation in fan funding. In L. Duits, K. Zwaan, & S. Reijnders (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to fan cultures (pp. 135–148). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillet, R. (2015). How relay FM proves that podcasts aren’t an overnight success. www.techcrunch.com [Internet]. Accessed 21 July 2016.

  • Doctor, K. (2016a). An island no more: Inside the business of the podcasting boom. www.niemanlab.org [Internet]. Accessed 28 Mar 2017.

  • Doctor, K. (2016b). Are you ready to pay for a Netflix for podcasts? www.niemanlab.org [Internet]. Accessed 28 Mar 2017.

  • Hilmes, M. (2007). Only connect. A cultural history of broadcasting in the United States (2nd ed.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmes, M. (2013a). The new materiality of radio. In J. Loviglio & M. Hilmes (Eds.), Radio’s new wave. Global sound in the digital era. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmes, M. (2013b). On a screen near you: The soundwork industry. Cinema Journal, 52(3), 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, A. (2014). The television will be revolutionized (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, A. (2017). Portals: A treatise on internet-distributed television. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loviglio, J. (2013). Public radio in crisis. In J. Loviglio & M. Hilmes (Eds.), Radio’s new wave. Global sound in the digital era (pp. 24–42). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lybsin. (2016). How to get your podcast into spotify! www.blog.libsyn.com [Internet]. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

  • Markman, K. M. (2012). Doing radio, making friends, and having fun: Exploring the motivations of independent audio podcasters. New Media & Society, 14(2), 547–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, K. M., & Sawyer, C. E. (2014). Why pod? Further explorations of the motivations for independent podcasting. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 21(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mars, R. (2013). Radiotopia. www.kickstarter.com [Internet]. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.

  • Matheson, W. (2014). Radiotopia: Plug in to this new podcast network. www.USAToday.com [Internet]. Accessed 21 July 2016.

  • Mayer, V. (2008). Studying up and f**cking up: Ethnographic interviewing in production studies. Cinema Journal, 47(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miège, B. (1989). The capitalization of cultural production. London: International General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray. (2009). Servicing ‘self-scheduling consumers’, public broadcasters and audio podcasting. Global Media and Communication, 5(2), 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution. New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPR. (2016). Public radio podcast measurement guidelines. bit.ly/podcastguidelines. Accessed 22 Feb 2017.

  • Patterson, E. (2016). Reconfiguring radio drama after television: The historical significance of Theater 5, Earplay and CBS Radio Mystery Theater as post-network radio drama. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 36(4), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phantom Haus. About Us. www.phantomhaus.org [Internet]. Accessed 25 July 2016.

  • PRX. About PRX. www.prx.org [Internet]. Accessed 25 July 2016.

  • Quah, N. Hot Pod. A Newsletter about Podcasts. www.hotpodnews.com [Internet]. Accessed 11 Sept 2017.

  • Radiotopia. About. www.radiotopia.fm [Internet]. Accessed 25 July 2016.

  • Radiotopia. (2017a). Radiotopia Podquest. www.radiotopia.fm [Internet]. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.

  • Radiotopia. (2017b). Radiotopia iTunes artist page. itunes.apple.com/nl/artist/radiotopia/id850139119?l=en&mt=2 [Internet]. Accessed 9 Feb 2017.

  • Relay FM. (2016). Relay FM iTunes artist/network page. itunes.apple.com/nl/artist/relay-fm/id908489268?l=en&mt=2 [Internet]. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.

  • Relay FM. About. www.relay.fm [Internet]. Accessed 25 July 2016.

  • Stimson, L. (2016). Nielsen adding podcast/on-demand to ratings. Radio and Television Business Report. www.rbr.com [Internet]. Accessed 22 July 2016.

  • The Heard. Who. www.theheardradio.com [Podcast]. Accessed 21 July 2016.

  • The Heard About. www.theheardradio.com [Podcast]. Accessed 21 July 2016.

  • Uricchio, W. (2004). Television’s next generation: Technology/interface culture/flow. In L. Spigel & J. Olsson (Eds.), Television after TV: Essays on a medium in transition. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2016). List of podcasting companies. en.wikipedia.org [Internet]. Accessed 21 June 2016.

  • Williams, R. (1990). In E. Williams (Ed.), Television: Technology and cultural form (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Originally published in 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lieven Heeremans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heeremans, L. (2018). Podcast Networks: Syndicating Production Culture. In: Llinares, D., Fox, N., Berry, R. (eds) Podcasting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90056-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics