Skip to main content

Theatre Assessment for Teaching and Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts

Abstract

In the world of higher education, participating in academic assessment has become an inescapable part of every faculty member’s job description. While theatre faculty members have an inherent understanding of what artistic growth looks like, we may not always be effective in measuring that growth in an assessment context. This chapter utilizes best practices in assessment to demystify the assessment process. Utilizing theatre-specific vocabulary, the chapter walks theatre practitioners through the basic steps of developing student learning outcomes, curriculum maps, developmental assessment rubrics that effectively measure specific program outcomes, and assessment plans. While most assessment literature ends with the collection and analysis of data, this chapter goes beyond to demonstrate methods that theatre practitioners can use to “Close the Loop” in their assessment cycles. By closing the loop on assessment data, theatre practitioners can recognize opportunities to develop innovative curriculum changes to help their students achieve the goals of the program. By fully completing the assessment cycle, theatre programs can reward innovation, better articulate program values, develop dynamic student-centered curriculum, and implement strategic program development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains, created in 1956 by educational psychologist Dr. Benjamin Bloom, was designed to promote higher forms of thinking rather than just rote learning. Lists of Bloom’s action verbs ranked according to levels of learning are easily found online. (www.bloomstaxonomy.org).

  2. 2.

    Competency-based curriculum uses the phrase “curriculum mapping” to emphasize how a student progresses through the program towards a specific program-goal. In most cases, this demonstrates for the student that if they take course X, course Y, and course Z they will build skills and advance to degree completion.

  3. 3.

    Performance analysis can be part of this outcome, as it is still text-based.

  4. 4.

    We recognize that this outcome is a compound sentence, but typically oral and written communication go hand in hand.

  5. 5.

    Note that many assessment professionals emphasize that evaluating student work at the programmatic level is more effective if done anonymously, and this process belies that. However, because this type of assessment is only one piece of the overall assessment pie, it is certainly acceptable.

References

  • “Assessment and VALUE”. Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://aacu.org/resources/assessment-and-value. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.

  • Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force. 1990. ATHE Outcomes Assessment Guidelines for Theatre Programs in Higher Education, White Paper. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.athe.org/resource/resmgr/imported/OutcomesAssessment.pdf.

  • Ball, William. 1984. A Sense of Direction: Some Observations on the Art of Directing. Hollywood: Quite Specific Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, Trudy W., and Catherine A. Palomba. 2015. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, Charles Edward. 2001. Accessing Institutional Planning Through Accreditation and Assessment. Theatre Topics 11 (1): 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, George D., Stanley O. Ikenberry, Natasha A. Jankowski, Timothy Reese Cain, Peter T. Ewell, Pat Hutchings, and Jillian Kinzie. 2015. Using Evidence of Student Learning to Improve Higher Education. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic National Arts Alumni Project. snaap.indiana.edu. Accessed 10 June 2017.

  • Suskie, Linda. 2009. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Duncan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duncan, J., Griffin, B.W., Malone, T. (2018). Theatre Assessment for Teaching and Learning. In: Fliotsos, A., Medford, G. (eds) New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89767-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics