Abstract
Graded multi-label classification (GMLC) is a supervised machine learning task where the association between each data and a label has a membership degree from an ordinal scale of membership degrees: for example, an odorous molecule can be associated to the graded subset of odors {strong musc, moderate animal} based on the ordinal scale of odor intensity: {very weak, weak, moderate, strong, very strong}, and a movie can be associated to the graded subset of labels {action \(\star \star \star \star \), suspense \(\star \star \), humour \(\star \star \)} based on the ordinal scale of one-to-five star rating. The aim in GMLC is to build a predictive model called classifier, in order to predict the graded set of labels based on descriptive attributes of data. For example, predicting the graded set of molecule odors based on molecular properties such as the molecular structure and weight. Or predicting the graded set of genres for a movie based on the synopsis and the main actors. An interesting challenge in GMLC is learning label relations and exploiting them to enhance the prediction performance of classifiers. A label relation can be a dependency relation: for example, movies containing a lot of ‘action’ often contains also some ‘suspense’. Another type of label relations is preference relations: for example, it is preferred to associate a movie containing a lot of movements to the label ‘action’ than to the label ‘humour’. The limitation of existing approaches is that they can either learn dependency relations or preference relations. This work reviews state of the art GMLC approaches, and introduces a new GMLC approach that can learn both dependency and preference label relations. Experiments on real datasets show that the new approach outperforms baseline approaches according the used prediction evaluation measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
E. Frank, M. Hall, A simple approach to ordinal classification, in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, ser. EMCL ’01 (Springer, London, UK, 2001), pp. 145–156
Z.-H. Zhou, M.-L. Zhang, Multi-label Learning (Springer, Boston, MA, 2017), pp. 875–881
F. Herrera, F. Charte, A.J. Rivera, M.J. del Jesus, Multilabel Classification Problem Analysis, Metrics and Techniques. Multilabel Classification (2016), pp. 17–31
W. Cheng, K. Dembczynski, E. Hllermeier, Graded multilabel classification: the ordinal case, in Proceedings of LWA2010 - Workshop-Woche: Lernen, Wissen & Adaptivitaet ed. by M. Atzmller, D. Benz, A. Hotho, G. Stumme (Kassel, Germany, 2010)
C. Brinker, E.L. Menca, J. Frnkranz, Graded multilabel classification by pairwise comparisons, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (2014), pp. 731–736
M.-L. Zhang and K. Zhang, “Multi-label learning by exploiting label dependency,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ser. KDD ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 999–1008
R. Al-Otaibi, M. Kull, P. Flach, Declaratively Capturing Local Label Correlations with Multi-Label Trees. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (IOS Press, Netherlands, 2016), pp. 1467–1475
G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, Multi-label classification: an overview. Int. J. Data Wareh. Min. 2007, 1–13 (2007)
J.R. Quinlan, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993)
B.E. Boser, I.M. Guyon, V.N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, COLT ’92 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1992), pp. 144–152
J. Friedman, Another approach to polychotomous classification, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Technical Report (1996)
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, Classification by pairwise coupling, in Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, NIPS ’97 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998), pp. 507–513
E. Loza Mencía, F. Janssen, Stacking label features for learning multilabel rules, in Discovery Science - 17th International Conference on DS 2014, Bled, Slovenia, 8-10 Oct 2014, Proceedings ed. by S. Deroski, P. Panov, D. Kocev, and L. Todorovski. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8777 (Springer, 2014), pp. 192–203
E. Loza Mencía, F. Janssen, Learning rules for multi-label classification: a stacking and a separate-and-conquer approach. Mach. Learn. 105(1), 77–126 (2016)
Z. Sun, Z. Guo, M. Jiang, X. Wang, C. Liu, Research and Application of Fast Multi-label SVM Classification Algorithm Using Approximate Extreme Points (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016), pp. 39–52
S. Agrawal, J. Agrawal, S. Kaur, S. Sharma, A comparative study of fuzzy pso and fuzzy svd-based rbf neural network for multi-label classification. Neural Computing and Applications, pp. 1–12, 2016
X. Wang, S. An, H. Shi, Q. Hu, Fuzzy Rough Decision Trees for Multi-label Classification (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015), pp. 207–217
J. Read, A Pruned Problem Transformation Method for Multi-label classification, in Proceedings of 2008 New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRS 2008) (2008), pp. 143–150
J. Read, B. Pfahringer, G. Holmes, E. Frank, Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Mach. Learn. 85(3), 333–359 (2011)
E. Montas, J.R. Quevedo, J.J. del Coz, Aggregating independent and dependent models to learn multi-label classifiers. in ECML/PKDD (2) ed. by D. Gunopulos, T. Hofmann, D. Malerba, M. Vazirgiannis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6912 (Springer, 2011), pp. 484–500
K. Laghmari, C. Marsala, M. Ramdani, Graded multi-label classification: Compromise between handling label relations and limiting error propagation, in 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA) (2016), pp. 1–6
E. Hüllermeier, J. Fürnkranz, W. Cheng, K. Brinker, Label ranking by learning pairwise preferences. Artif. Intell. 172(1617), 1897–1916 (2008)
J. Fürnkranz, E. Hüllermeier, E. Loza Mencía, K. Brinker, Multilabel classification via calibrated label ranking. Mach. Learn. 73(2), 133–153 (2008)
C. Brinker, E.L. Menca, J. Frnkranz, Graded multilabel classification by pairwise comparisons, in ICDM ed. by R. Kumar, H. Toivonen, J. Pei, J.Z. Huang, X. Wu (IEEE Computer Society, 2014), pp. 731–736
K. Laghmari, C. Marsala, M. Ramdani, Classification multi-labels graduee apprendre les relations entre les labels ou limiter la propagation d erreur, Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Information, vol. Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances, RNTI-E-33 (2017), pp. 381–386
G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, I. Vlahavas, Mining multi-label data, in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (2010), pp. 667–685
S. Destercke, Multilabel Prediction with Probability Sets: The Hamming Loss Case (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014), pp. 496–505
S. Godbole, S. Sarawagi, Discriminative methods for multi-labeled classification, in Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 8th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2004, Sydney, Australia, May 26-28, 2004. Proceedings (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004), pp. 22–30
I. Pillai, G. Fumera, F. Roli, Designing multi-label classifiers that maximize f measures: State of the art. Pattern Recognit. 61, 394–404 (2017)
M. Kubat, R. Holte, S. Matwin, Learning When Negative Examples Abound ( Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997), pp. 146–153
K. Trohidis, G. Tsoumakas, G. Kalliris, I.P. Vlahavas, Multi-label classification of music into emotions, in ISMIR ed. by J.P. Bello, E. Chew, D. Turnbull (2008), pp. 325–330
M.R. Boutell, J. Luo, X. Shen, C.M. Brown, Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recognit. 37(9), 1757–1771 (2004)
A. Elisseeff, J. Weston, A kernel method for multi-labelled classification, in In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14 (MIT Press, 2001), pp. 681–687
A.E. Abele-Brehm, M. Stief, Die prognose des berufserfolgs von hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen: Befunde zur ersten und zweiten erhebung der erlanger l’angsschnittstudie Bela-E[predicting career success of university graduates: Findings of the first and second wave of the erlangen longitudinal study Bela-E]. Zeitschrift fr Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O 48(1), 4–16 (2004)
S. Arctander, Perfume and Flavor Chemicals: (aroma Chemicals), ser (Aroma Chemicals. Allured Publishing Corporation, Perfume and Flavor Chemicals, 1969)
A. Mauri, V. Consonni, M. Pavan, R. Todeschini, Dragon software: an easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations. MATCH/Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 56, 237–248 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laghmari, K., Marsala, C., Ramdani, M. (2018). Learning Label Dependency and Label Preference Relations in Graded Multi-label Classification. In: Pedrycz, W., Chen, SM. (eds) Computational Intelligence for Pattern Recognition. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 777. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89629-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89629-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89628-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89629-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)