Skip to main content

Pedogeomorphic Analysis in Land Resource Inventory: A Case Study from Central India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Technologies in Land Resources Mapping, Monitoring and Management

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 21))

  • 1894 Accesses

Abstract

In the study, the importance of pedogeomorphic analysis in land resource inventories at various scales, mutual contributions of pedology and geomorphology, classification of geoforms, application of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) in geomorphology mapping were discussed. This article describes how pedogeomorphic analysis was used in detailed soil surveys in basaltic uplands of Darwha plateau in Yavatmal district, Maharashtra, in developing soil-landscape models that control and explain the shrink-swell soil pattern within a land region having similar agricultural management requirements for cotton-based cropping systems. Soil-landscape relationships in Darwha plateau were studied in detailed along the transects comprised of lithic/typic Ustorthents on plateau tops to lithic/typic/vertic Haplustepts on pediments and leptic to Typic Haplusterts on pediplains. The key pedogenic processes recognized in shrink-swells were identified as development of vertic features and CaCO3 accumulation in deeper layers. Both field and laboratory analyses confirmed that the soils within landscapes form a continuum but that recognition of the soil groupings was more practical and feasible in mapping soils in the region. A combination of IRS-P6 and Cartosat-I fused data, field examination of soils and their characterization was used to recognize landscape-related soil groupings to develop farm scale maps that can support multiple land use applications and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad N, Marmut A (1996) Vertisols and technologies for their management. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja RL, Manchandra ML, Sangwan BS, Goyal VP, Agarwal RP (1992) Utilization of remote sensing data for soil resource mapping and its interpretation of land use planning of Bhiwani district Haryana. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 20(2&3):105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi SA, Merh SS (1991) Morphotectonic analysis of South Gujarat landscape. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 57A(6):683–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman GO, Machette MN (1977) Calcic soils and calcretes in the southwestern United States. United States of America, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), pp 77–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JC, Cunningham RL, Havens MW (1994) Soil drainage class probability mapping using a soil-landscape model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J, Moon WM (2012) Very high-resolution remote sensing: challenges and opportunities. Proc IEEE 100(6):1907–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Muliti resolution, object oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP (2015) Landscape planning for agridevelopment at regional scale: an example from cotton growing Yavatmal district, Maharashtra, India. J Agric Environ Int Dev 109(2):235–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Gajbhiye KS (1997) Soils of Jayakwadi irrigation project, minor-4, report no. 535, pp 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Anantwar SG, Challa O, Bharambhe PR, Velayutham M (2001) Catenary variations in properties of shrink-swell soils in minor 4 of Jayakwadi irrigation project in Parbhani District. J Geol Soc India 57(5):429–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Raja P, Gajbhiye KS, Maji AK, Singh SR, Anantwar SG, Nimkar AM (2010) Topographic appraisal for irrigation suitability in a part of Jayakwadi command area, Parbhani District, Maharashtra. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 58(4):363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Sarkar D, Mandal C, Bobade SV, Gaikwad MS, Gaikwad SS et al (2014) Reconnaissance soil survey of Yavatmal district, Maharashtra, India. NBSS Publication. No.1059, NBSS&LUP, Nagpur, pp 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Satyavati PLA, Mandal C, Singh SK (2015) Analysis of Aridityin relation to climate and sustainability of cotton production in India. Climate change and sustainable technologies. Environ Sci Engg 12:84–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar BP, Chaturvedi A, Bhattacharyya T, Gaikwad SS (2017) Land resource inventory and evaluation for agricultural land use planning in semiarid ecosystem of Western India. In: Reddy GPO, Patil NG, Chaturvedi A (eds) Sustainbale management of land resources- an Indian perspective. Apple Academic Press, Pleasant, pp 47–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee JC, Landey RJ, Kalabande AR (1977) A new approach in the study of Vertisols morphology. J Soil Indian Soc Sci 25:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1993) Genesis and transformation of minerals for in the formation of red (Alfisols) and black (Inceptisols and Vertisols) soils on Deccan Basalt in the Western Ghats, India. J Soil Sci 44:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland PW (1984) Soils and geomorphology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland PW (1990) Soil geomorphic research-a selective overview. In: Kneuenfer PLK, Mac Fadden LD (ed) “Soils and landscape evaluation”, Geomorphology 3:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges EM (1982) Techniques of modern soil survey. In: Bridges EM, Davidson DA (eds) Principles and applications of soilgeography. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman HD (1965) Cation exchange capacity. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, Number 9 in the series agronomy. American Institute of Agronomy, Madison, pp 891–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraj S, Srivastava R, Barthwal AK, Giri JD, Mohekar DS, Reddy GPO, Daripa A, Chatterji S, Singh SK (2017) Semi-automated object-based landform classification modelling in a part of the Deccan Plateau of central India. Int J Remote Sens 38(17):4855–4867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels RB, Hammer RD (1992) Soil geomorphology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent D, Young A (1981) Soil survey and land use planning. George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobos E, Hengle T (2009) Soil mapping applications. Dev Soil Sci 33:461–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Effland ABW, Effland WR (1992) Soilgeomorphology studies in the US soil surveyprogram. Agric Hist 66:189–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers M, Janowsky R, Gaehler M (2002) New remote sensing concepts for environmental monitoring. Proceedings of SPIE 4545, 1–12 (Bellingham)

    Google Scholar 

  • Euillades LD, Grosse P, Euillades PA (2013) NETVOLC: an algorithm for automatic delimitation of volcano edifice boundaries using DEMs. Comput Geosci 56:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1967) The state of food and agriculture. FAO, Rome, pp 1–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky IV (1998) Accuracy of land topographical variables derived from digital elevation models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser S, Jones H, Hill R, Hainsworth S, Tikkisetty B (2014) Soil windows-unravelling soils in the landscape at the farm scale. In: Currie LD, Christensen CL (eds) Nutrient management for the farm, catchment and community. http://flrc.massey.ac.nz/publications.html. Occasional report 27. Fertilizer & Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

  • Furley PA (1971) Relationships between slope form and soilproperties developed over chalk parent materials. In: Brunsden D (ed) Slopes: forms and processes, Institute of British geographers special publication no.3. Institute of British Geographers, Kensington Gore, pp 141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande SP, Biswas TD (1977) Characterisation and classification of black soils developed on basaltin relation to microrelief. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 25(3):233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessler EE, Morre ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan EJ (1995) Soil-landscape modelling and spatial pridiction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobin A, Campling P, Deckers J, Feyen J (2000) Integrated toposequence analysis to combine local and scientific knowledge systems. Geoderma 97:103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond EH (1954) Small scale continental landform maps. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 32–42(2):44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond EH (1964) Analysis of properties in landform geography: an application to broad scale landform mapping. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 54:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks DM (1991) Genesis and classification of arid region soils. In: Skujins J (ed) Semiarid lands and deserts: soil resource and reclamation. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 33–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson BD (1992) The soil survey as paradigm-based science. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:836–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilaco BV (1985) Agricultural compendium: for rural development in the tropics and subtropics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 738

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p 498

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1980) The soil resource. Origin and behaviour, Ecological studies 37. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy YVN, Adiga S (2008) Remote sensing and GIS for land use planning. http://www.ncap.res.in/upload_files/workshop/ws5_chapter10.pdf

  • Laker MC, Dupreez CC (1982) An investigation into the accuracy of hydrometers for soil particle size determination. Agroplantae 14:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malewar GU (2005) Micronutrient stresses in soils and crops:serious sickness and clinical approaches for sustainable agriculture. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 53(4):484–499

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendonça Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117(1–2):3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor DFM, Thompson DA (eds) (1995) Geomorphology and land management in a changing environment. Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel P (1973) Les basins des fleuves Senegal et Ques. Mem.de l’. O.R.S.T.O.M. 63. (Paris), pp 1–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne G (1935) Some suggested units of classification and mapping for East African soils. Soil Res 4:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnik MC, Verster E, Rooyen TC (1984) Pedogeomorphic aspects of the Roodepoort area, Transvaal: soil depth-slope relationships. South Afr J Plant Soil 1:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munnik MC, Verster E, van Rooyen TH (1986) Soil-site relationships in the Roodepoort area, Transvaal. South Afr J Plant Soil 3:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraju MSS, Kumar N, Srivastava R, Das SN (2014) Cadastral level soil mapping in basaltic terrain using Cartosat-1 derived products. Int J Remote Sens 35(10):3764–3781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1987) Characteristics and genesis of minerals in some benchmark Vertisols of India. Pédologie 37:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal DK, Dasog GS, Bhattacharyya T (2009) Pedogenetic processes in cracking clay soils (Vertisols) in tropical environments of India: a critique. Indian Soc Soil Sci 57:422–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen GBM, Grosse P (2014) Morphometry of subaerial shield volcanoes and glaciovolcanoes from Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: effects of eruption environment. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 282:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike RJ (2000) Geomorphometry — diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Prog Phys Geogr 24:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai M, Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1996) Distribution of clay minerals and their genesis in ferruginous and black soils occurring in close proximity on Deccan basalt plateau of Nagpur district, Maharashtra. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 44:500–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Pofali RM, Bhattacharya JC, Landey RJ (1979) Landscape anlysis for soil mapping in basaltic terrain. Geograph Rev India 41(3):267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouquet J (1966) Initiation géopédologique. Les sols et la géographie. SEDES, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad CR, Thayalan S, Reddy RS, Reddy PSA (1990) Use of Landsat imagery for mapping soil and land resources for devolopment planning in parts of north Kamataka of India. Int J Remote Sens 11(10):1889–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad J, Sarkar D, Gupta RK, Tiwary P, Bhaskar BP, Chandran P, Ray SK, Bhattacharyya T, Gaikwad SS, Nimkar AM, Anantwar SG (2012) Resource Inventory of Khamaria seeds farm in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh for Borlaug Institute of South Asia (BISA). NBSS&LUP Publications, Nagpur, p 90

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja P, Bhaskar BP, Deepak Malpe, Anantwar SG, Tapaswi PM (2010) Geochemistry of salt affected soils in Purna valley, Maharashtra, India: their paleoclimatic implications. J App Goechem 12(3):491–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao DP (2002) Remote sensing application in geomorphology. Trop Ecol 43(1):49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao BRM, Fyzee MA, Wadodkar MR (2004) Utilityof remote sensing data for mapping soils at various scales and levels. In: Venkatratnam L, Ravisankar T, Sudarshana R (eds) Soils and crops. NRSA Publications, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravisankar T, Thamappa SS (2004) Satellite data interpretation and analysis for soil mapping. In: Venkatratnam L, Ravisankar T, Sudarshana R (eds) Soils and crops. NRSA Publication, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy GPO, Shekinah DE, Maurya UK, Thayalan S, Prasad J, Ray SK, Bhaskar BP (1999) Landscape-soil relationship in part of Bazargaon plateau, Maharashtra. Geograph Rev India 61(3):280–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MGR, Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Nageshwara Rao K (2003) Landscape analysis for pedo-geomorphological characterization in part of basaltic terrain, Central India using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(4):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer DL (1999) Depth to pedogenic carbonate horizon as a paleoprecipitation indicator? Geology 27(12):1123–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe RV (1975) Geomorphology. Geomorphic processes and surficial geology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA (2001) A geomorphic description system (version 3.0). National Soil Survey Center. US Departmentof Agriculture, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC, Soil Survey Staff (2012) Field book for describing and sampling soils. Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal JL (1992) Soil series criteria and norms. Technical Bulletin. NBSS Publications 36. NBSS&LUP. ICAR, Nagpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir AS, Samira ASO, Muayyad EJ, Shihab A, Hanna AR (2004) Soil survey for farm level planning in northern Kuwait. Kuwait J Sci Eng 31(1):43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RJ, Coughlan KJ, Bell LC (1998) Root zone sodicity. In: Sumner NE, Naidu R (eds) Sodic soils: distribution, properties, management, and environmental consequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth HC (1999) A historical approach to continental flood basalt volcanism: insights into pre-volcanic rifting, sedimentation, and early alkaline magmatism. Earth Planet Sci Lett 168:19–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1996) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Ver. 3.0. USDA/NRCS, soil survey investigations report no. 42. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12 th edn. USDA-NRCS, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam V (1974) A quantitative analysis of two drainage basins around Sagar, Madhya Pradesh. Indian Nat Sci Acad 40(1):76–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornbury WD (2004) Principles of geomorphology, 2nd edn. Wiley and Sons, London, p 631

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricart J (1972) Landforms of the humid tropics, forests and savannas, 1st edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Kerle N, Poesen J, Hervás J (2012) Object-oriented identification of forested landslides with derivatives of single pulse LiDAR data. Geomorphology 173–174(0):30–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veneman PLM, Bodine SM (1982) Chemical and morphological soil characteristics in a New Engiand drainagetoposequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataratnam L (1984) Monitoring and managing soil and land resources in India using remotely sensed data. Proceedings on 3rd Asian agriculture symposium, Chiangmai, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Verster E (1987) Soils derived from granite in two Mt. Garnet toposequences, North Queensland, Australia. South Afr J Plant Soil 4:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink APA (1968) Role of physical geography in integrated surveys in developing countries. J Econ Soc Geogr 59(6):294–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadodkar M, Ravishankar T (2011) Soil resource data base at village level for developmental planning. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 30(4):529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh S, Butler D, Malanson G (1998) An overview of scale, pattern, process relationships in geomorphology: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Geomorphology 21:183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way DS (1973) Terrain analysis. A guide to site selection using aerial photographic interpretation. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaalon DH (1975) Conceptual models in pedogenesis: can soil-forming functions be solved? Geoderma 14:189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinck JA (2013) Geopedology-elements of geomorphology for soil and geohazard studies. ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhaskar, B.P. (2018). Pedogeomorphic Analysis in Land Resource Inventory: A Case Study from Central India. In: Reddy, G., Singh, S. (eds) Geospatial Technologies in Land Resources Mapping, Monitoring and Management. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78711-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics