Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Conversations with Parents May Help Children Learn to Separate the Sheep from the Goats (and the Robots)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Active Learning from Infancy to Childhood

Abstract

We examined how children’s active participation in parent–child conversations helps them organize the conceptual space of the animal domain. Three complementary research studies inform our understandings: (1) a diary study of family conversations about animals, (2) an investigation of how parent–child conversations about the properties of varied living and nonliving entities may inform children’s developing understanding of animacy, and (3) an examination of parent–child conversations about animals that vary in similarity to humans. We found that parents share information that is scientifically accurate alongside information that may encourage anthropomorphic and anthropocentric reasoning about animals. This information is greeted by an active child who can sort through the give-and-take of conversation to (ultimately) construct coherent representations of the biological domain. This rich portrait of parent–child conversation contrasts with the model of the child as a mere recipient of parental wisdom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, N., Haden, C. A., & Wilkerson, E. (2010). Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver-child interactions in a children’s museum. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. A., Castañeda, C. L., Luce, M. R., & Martin, J. L. (2017). Family science talk in museums: Predicting children’s engagement from variations in talk and activity. Child Development, 88(5), 1492–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. A., & Jipson, J. L. (2001). Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., & Soennichsen, M. S. (2002). Maps, globes, and videos: Parent-child conversations about representational objects. In S. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on children’s object-centered learning in museums. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard, M. M. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 72(1), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, J. D. (1995). Emerging differentiation of folkbiology and folkpsychology: Attributions of biological and psychological properties to living things. Child Development, 66(6), 1856–1874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85, 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., & Galco, J. (2001). Everyday activity and the development of scientific thinking. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 393–413). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, K. Knutson, G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development, 80(6), 1592–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Young children prefer and remember satisfying explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(5), 718–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganea, P., Canfield, C., Simons-Ghafari, K., & Chou, T. (2014). Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children’s knowledge about animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2009). Learning from others: Children’s construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(1), Serial No. 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., & Kalish, C. W. (2006). Conceptual development. In: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 687–733). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif M. L., Kemler-Nelson D. G., Keil F. C., Guitierrez F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17, 455–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haden, C. A., Jant, E. A., Hoffman, P. C., Marcus, M., Geddes, J. R., & Gaskins, S. (2014). Supporting family conversations and children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., Bartz, D. T., & Rowe, M. L. (2017). Young children communicate their ignorance and ask questions. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 114, 7884–7891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., & Koenig, M. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77(3), 505–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. E., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2010). Parents’ use of conventional and unconventional labels in conversations with their preschoolers. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 793–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, P., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2010). Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9979–9984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jant, E. A., Haden, A., Uttal, D. H., & Babcock, E. (2014). Conversation and object manipulation influence children’s learning in a museum. Child Development, 85(5), 2029–2045.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jipson, J. L., & Callanan, M. A. (2003). Mother-child conversations and children’s understanding of biological and nonbiological changes in size. Child Development, 74(2), 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jipson, J. L., Gulgoz, S., Gelman, S. A. (2016). Parent-child conversations regarding the ontological status of a robotic dog. Cognitive Development, 39, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P.J., Reichert, A.L., Gary, H.E., Takayuki, K., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., …, Gill, B. (2011). The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 159–160).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1998). Words, mom, and things: Language as a road map to reality. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(1), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legare, C. H., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2010). Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children’s causal explanatory reasoning. Child Development, 81(3), 929–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S., & Witherington, D. C. (2004). Mothers’ behavior modifications during pretense and their possible signal value for toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBue, V., Bloom Pickard, M., Sherman, K., Axford, C., & DeLoache, J. S. (2013). Young children’s interest in live animals. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D., Waxman, S., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children’s reasoning: Culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. M. (2013). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 404–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. M., Legare, C. H., Grant, M. G., & Landrum, A. R. (2011). Determining whom to question, what to ask, and how much information to ask for: The development of inquiry in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. A., & Delude, L. A. (1989). Behavior of young children in the presence of different kinds of animals. Anthrozoös, 3(2), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opfer, J. E., & Gelman, S. A. (2011). Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 213–238). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum. Science Education, 91(5), 783–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J. C., & Callanan, M. A. (2011). Patterns in parent–child conversations about animals at a marine science center. Cognitive Development, 26(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by Observing and Pitching In to family and community endeavors: An orientation. Human Development, 57(2–3), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72(4), 1054–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, M. A., & Callanan, M. A. (1998). Metarepresentation in action: 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds’ developing theories of mind in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 34, 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, M. M., Somanader, M., Levin, D. T., & Kawamura, K. (2010). How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz, M. (1994). A toddler’s life: Becoming a person. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (2017). Core Knowledge, Language, and Number. Language Learning and Development, 13, 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it’s an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in preschool children’s reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78, 705–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, S., & Medin, D. (2007). Experience and cultural models matter: Placing firm limits on childhood anthropocentrism. Human Development, 50, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, S., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., Medin, D. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban children’s construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA

    Jennifer L. Jipson

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Danielle Labotka & Susan A. Gelman

  3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Maureen A. Callanan

Authors
  1. Jennifer L. Jipson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle Labotka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maureen A. Callanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susan A. Gelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Jipson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Megan M. Saylor

  2. Department of Applied Psychology & Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Patricia A. Ganea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jipson, J.L., Labotka, D., Callanan, M.A., Gelman, S.A. (2018). How Conversations with Parents May Help Children Learn to Separate the Sheep from the Goats (and the Robots). In: Saylor, M., Ganea, P. (eds) Active Learning from Infancy to Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77182-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation