Skip to main content

Release and Reentry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminal Justice and Mental Health
  • 91k Accesses

Abstract

Reentering society can be one of the most difficult obstacles a justice-involved person can face in their lifetime. All facets of one’s life change instantly upon release from prison. The controlled environment of a prison facility allows an inmate to create a routine and have stability in relationships and daily activities. A person behind bars knows exactly when the next phone call to a loved one will take place, the next meal, activity time, etc. These things are no longer regular, or controllable, on the outside in society. Often times, individuals struggle in the chaos that exists outside the prison walls. The best chance for success involves planning and preparing for those changes and learning coping skills to handle them in a healthy manner. Unfortunately, this is not always realistic on many levels. The most comprehensive evaluation of prisoner (e.g., excludes jail inmate) recidivism available reveals that 30.4% of prisoners return to prison within a year, 43.3% return in 2 years, 49.7% return in 3 years, 52.9% return in 4 years, and 55.1%—over half—return in 5 years (Durose, Cooper, & Snyder, 2014). If one simply looks at prisoners being arrested after release, many of which require stays in jail as arrestees await criminal justice processing, the statistics are even bleaker: 43.4% are arrested within a year, 59.5% within 2 years, 67.8% within 3 years, 73.0% in 4 years, and 76.6% in 5 years. Further, a large proportion of individuals rearrested after release from prison are drawn back into the criminal justice system (including jails and diversion programs), typically through a sanction by the court and/or by probation/parole violations and revocations. Ultimately, the plan to reduce contact with the criminal justice system exists within the transition planning before, in the moment of, and after release from incarceration, with the courts and probation/parole being key players in the reentry movement. This needs to include both jails and prisons, but importantly, it needs to include a mental health element more substantial than just attending to substance abuse treatment issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayoub, L. H., & Pooler, T. (2015). Coming Home to Harlem: A randomized controlled trial of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court. New York: Center for Court Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick, J. A. (2007). Infection control in jails and prisons. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 45(8), 1047–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonczar, T. P. (2003). Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974-2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/piusp01.pdf

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014). Survey of state criminal history information systems, 2012. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bjs/grants/244563.pdf

  • Carey, S., Rempel, M., Lindquist, C., Cissner, A., Hassoun Ayoub, L., Kralstein, D., et al. (2017). Reentry court research: Overview of findings from the national institute of justice’s multi-site evaluation (Unpublished, preliminary evaluation report). Submitted to National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice in February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, E. A., & Anderson, E. (2016). Prisoners in 2015. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p15.pdf

  • Cook, P. J., Kang, S., Braga, A. A., Ludwig, J., & O’Brien, M. E. (2015). An experimental evaluation of a comprehensive employment-oriented prisoner re-entry program. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 355–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2017). National inventory of the collateral consequences of conviction. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/

  • Davis, L. M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Rand Corporation. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR266.html

  • Doleac, J. L., & Hansen, B. (2016). Does “Ban the Box” help low-skilled workers?: Statistical discrimination and employment outcomes when criminal histories are hidden. Research Briefs in Economic Policy (62). Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://www.cato.org/publications/research-briefs-economic-policy/does-ban-box-help-or-hurt-low-skilled-workers

  • Durose, M. R. Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rprts05p0510.pdf

  • Galofaro, C. (2012). St. Tammany courts give parish nickname of ‘St. Slammany.’ The Times Picayune. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/03/st_tammany_courts_give_parish.html

  • Hampden County Sheriff’s Office. (2015). Presentation: Special commission on substance Abuse addiction treatment in the criminal justice system. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/specialty-courts/specialty-courts-hampden-sheriff.pdf

  • Johnson, R. (2002). Hard time (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafayette Parish Sheriff’s Office. (2011). Reentry survival manual. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from https://www.lafayettesheriff.com/uploads/ReentrySkillsSurvivalManual62811.pdf

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2003). Welcome home-examining the reentry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellow, J., Mukamal, D. A., LoBuglio, S. F., Solomon, A. L., & Osborne, J. W. (2008). The jail administrator’s toolkit for reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., & Khey, D. N. (2017). Fighting America’s highest incarceration rates with offender programming: Process evaluation implications from the Louisiana 22nd Judicial District Reentry Court. American Journal of Criminal Justice , 42(3):574–588.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-016-9372-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J. B., & Tangney, J. P. (2016). The effect of stigma on criminal offenders’ functioning: A longitudinal mediational model. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 196–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osher, F. C. (2006). Integrating mental health and substance abuse services for justice-involved persons with co-occurring disorders. Baltimore, MD: National GAINS Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osher, F. C. (2007). Short-term strategies to improve reentry of jail populations: Expanding and implementing the APIC model. American Jails, 20, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison Journal, 79(4), 384–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry-reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68(2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, A. (2014). Philadelphia’s prisons are embracing technology. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/07/smallbusiness/philadelphia-technology-prison/index.html

  • Ryan, C. L., & Bauman, K. (2016). Educational attainment in the United States: 2015. U.S. Census. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p20-578.pdf

  • Solomon, A. L., Osborne, J. W., LoBuglio, S. F., Mellow, J., & Mukamal, D. A. (2008). Life after lockup: Improving reentry from jail to the community. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J. (2000). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J., & Visher, C. (Eds.). (2005). Prisoner reentry and crime in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R. V. (2011). Reentry courts: Looking ahead. Bureau of Justice Assistance. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://www.bja.gov/Publications/CCI_ReentryCourts.pdf

  • Wolff, N., & Shi, J. (2012). Childhood and adult trauma experiences of incarcerated persons and their relationship to adult behavioral health problems and treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(5), 1908–1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hector, J., Khey, D. (2018). Release and Reentry. In: Criminal Justice and Mental Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76442-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76442-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76441-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76442-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics