Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Playbour and the Gamification of Work: Empowerment, Exploitation and Fun as Labour Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

Ferrer-Conill critically analyses the trend of incorporating playful thinking and game elements within working processes among organizations and businesses with the promise of worker empowerment and self-realization. Focusing on the notion of playbour and gamification of work, this chapter discusses and contextualises practical and theoretical outcomes of adopting technologies that on the one hand promise turning labour into fun and enjoyment, and on the other hand are based on opaque assemblages grounded in exploitation, surveillance and control. Ferrer-Conill concludes that the traditional frictions between work and play are mediated by contradicting labour dynamics embedded in a technological assemblage that attempts to both empower and exploit the employee, whose only choice is to play or revolt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrejevic, M. (2011). The work that affective economics does. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. (2015). Why gamification is bullshit 2. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 65–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage: Towards a broader framework of user-led content creation. In Proceedings: Creativity & Cognition 2007: Seeding Creativity: Tools, Media, and Environments (Vol. 6, pp. 99–106). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play and games. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, S. (2014). Zombification?: Gamification, motivation, and the user. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, H., Rost, M., & Holmquist, L. E. (2011). Performing a check-in: Emerging practices, norms and “conflicts” in location-sharing using foursquare (pp. 57–66). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037384

  • De Kosnik, A. (2013). Fandom as free labor. In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory (pp. 98–111). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., & Dixon, D. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). Tampere: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

  • DeWinter, J., & Kocurek, C. A. (2014). Games, gamification, and labour politics. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWinter, J., Kocurek, C. A., & Nichols, R. (2014). Taylorism 2.0: Gamification, scientific management and the capitalist appropriation of play. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, K., & Shoup, K. (2013). Business gamification for dummies (1st ed.). Hoboken/Chichester: For Dummies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer Conill, R. (2016). Feeding the red critter: The gamification of project management software. In M. Dymek & P. Zackariasson (Eds.), The business of gamification (pp. 21–40). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Conill, R. (2017). Quantifying journalism? A study on the use of data and gamification to motivate journalists. Television & New Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417697271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2014a). Social media: A critical introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. (2014b). Gamification as twenty-first-century ideology. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. (2015). Total gamification. In M. Fuchs (Ed.), Diversity of play (pp. 7–20). Lüneburg: Meson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P., & Schrape, N. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking gamification. Lüneburg: Meson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, J. (2011). Playbour, farming and labour. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 11(4), 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J. (2015, February). Gamification. Motivations & effects. PhD, Aalto University, Aalto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herger, M. (2014). Enterprise gamification: Engaging people by letting them have fun (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Los Altos: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (Updated and with a new afterword). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juul, J. (2000). What computer games can and can’t do. Presented at the Digital Arts and Culture Conference, Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopeć, J., & Pacewicz, K. (Eds.). (2015). Gamification. Critical approaches. Warsaw: The Faculty of “Artes Liberales”, University of Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. Fibreculture, 5(1). http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/kucklich_print.html

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. In S. Makdisi, C. Casarino, & R. E. Karl (Eds.), Marxism beyond Marxism (pp. 133–147). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2011). I’m the mayor of my house: Examining why people use foursquare – a social-driven location sharing application (p. 2409). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979295

  • Lund, A. (2014). Playing, gaming, working and labouring: Framing the concepts and relations. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2), 735–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1973). On the philosophical foundation of the concept of labor in economics. Telos, 1973(16), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.3817/0673016009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world (Reprint ed.). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 1–20). New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, C. (2014). Getting played: Gamification, bullshit, and the rise of algorithmic surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 12(3), 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paharia, R. (2013). Loyalty 3.0: How to revolutionize customer and employee engagement with big data and gamification. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, P. J. (2012). Gamification, playbor & exploitation. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from https://pjrey.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/gamification-playbor-exploitation/

  • Rey, P. J. (2015). Gamification and post-fordist capitalism. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 277–295). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. (1994). Georges Bataille. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2013). Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicart, M. (2014). Play matters. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotamaa, O. (2007). On modder labour, commodification of play, and mod competitions. First Monday, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i9.2006

  • Steinfeld, R. J. (2001). Coercion, contract, and free labor in the nineteenth century. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (2001). The ambiguity of play (2. printing, 1. Harvard University Press paperback ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1989). The nature of work. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-349-20028-3

  • Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, and Society, 31(1), 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbach, K. (2014). (Re)defining gamification: A process approach. In A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro, & L. Gamberini (Eds.), Persuasive technology, LNCS 8462 (Vol. 8462, pp. 118–136). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance & Society, 11(1/2), 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, R. (2016). The de-gamification of Foursquare? In T. Leaver & M. Willson (Eds.), Social, casual and mobile games. The changing gaming landscape (pp. 179–192). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zackariasson, P. (2016). Old things – New names. In M. Dymek & P. Zackariasson (Eds.), The business of gamification (pp. 219–226). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zichermann, G., & Linder, J. (2010). Game-based marketing: Inspire customer loyalty through rewards, challenges, and contests (1st ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zichermann, G., & Linder, J. (2013). The gamification revolution: How leaders leverage game mechanics to crush the competition. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, E. (2015). Manifesto for a ludic century. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 19–22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

    Raul Ferrer-Conill

Authors
  1. Raul Ferrer-Conill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Culture and Communication, Institute for Development and International Relations, Zagreb, Croatia

    Paško Bilić

  2. Department for Culture and Communication, Institute for Development and International Relations, Zagreb, Croatia

    Jaka Primorac

  3. Department of Arts and Cultural Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Bjarki Valtýsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferrer-Conill, R. (2018). Playbour and the Gamification of Work: Empowerment, Exploitation and Fun as Labour Dynamics. In: Bilić , P., Primorac, J., Valtýsson, B. (eds) Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76279-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76279-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76278-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76279-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation