Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations in Against Medical Advice Discharges: Value Conflicts Over Patient Autonomy and Best Interests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Against‐Medical‐Advice Discharges from the Hospital

Abstract

Patients who wish to leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA) present physicians with a common but challenging ethical dilemma. Physicians are obligated to respect patient’s autonomy when patients choose treatment consistent with their values, needs, and preferences. However, physicians also have a fiduciary obligation to promote the patient’s best interest by recommending medically appropriate care. This chapter will provide guidance in managing this ethical dilemma by reviewing the construct of medical advice giving, examining the central role of power in that process, describing the process of shared decision-making and how it promotes strong ethics practices in informed consent, and exploring the role of surrogates in the AMA process.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Government, or the VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. Alfandre D. Reconsidering against medical advice discharges: embracing patient-centeredness to promote high quality care and a renewed research agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(12):1657–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2540-z. Epub 2013 Jul

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfandre D. Clinical recommendations in medical practice – a proposed framework for reducing bias and improving decision quality. J Clin Ethics. 2016;27(1):21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger JT. Discharge against medical advice: ethical considerations and professional obligations. J Hosp Med. 2008;3(5):403–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger JT, DeRenzo EG, Schwartz J. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brody H. The healer’s power. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer MA, Stedman MR, Lii J, Vogeli C, Shrank WH, Brookhart MA, Weissman JS. Primary medication non-adherence: analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(4):284–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lekas HM, Alfandre D, Gordon P, Harwood K, Yin MT. The role of patient-provider interactions: using an accounts framework to explain hospital discharges against medical advice. Soc Sci Med. 2016;156:106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tollen WB. Irregular discharge: the problem of hospitalization of the tuberculous. Public Health Rep. 1948;63(45):1441–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Windish DM, Ratanawongsa N. Providers’ perceptions of relationships and professional roles when caring for patients who leave the hospital against medical advice. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey T. Berger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berger, J.T., Alfandre, D. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Against Medical Advice Discharges: Value Conflicts Over Patient Autonomy and Best Interests. In: Alfandre, D. (eds) Against‐Medical‐Advice Discharges from the Hospital. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75130-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75130-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75129-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75130-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics