Skip to main content

Conclusion to the Book: Storying Our Co-responsibilities as Part of Methodological Write-up

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Research Practice
  • 539 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout this book I have forwarded suggestions for those involved in research endeavors to responsibly take into consideration the immersion of the research in the “becoming” of social and ecological existence (of which it is a part). I now suggest that when researchers post facto generate methodological stories around how the design of the research became ongoingly accomplished, these responsibilities should be foregrounded, with ethical considerations concerning the exercise of responsibility and co-responsibility included in the storying . Instead of focusing on trying to label research work with respect to designs as given in the (much cited) literature on strategies of inquiry, I propose that the doing, and writing up, of research should become differently geared. That is, we should pay attention to practices of active involvement with others (as selves-in-relation) in trying to exercise (co)-responsibility for the future-forming potential of research. I suggest that to highlight the quality of such activity, the word “active” can preface the labels commonly used to characterise research designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Taylor (2013) outlines her view of the differentiation between methodologies, methods and processes in qualitative research, but the same considerations (definitions) could apply in quantitative research.

  2. 2.

    Merriam too refers to these common designs (2002, p. 7). But she includes in her account of designs what she calls “critical qualitative research” (2002, p. 9) and “postmodern research” (2002, p. 10), which offer challenges to “traditional” qualitative research. She suggests that when the intention is, as in critical qualitative research, to “bring about change” there are no “guidelines about how to do this type of study” (2002, p. 10). That is, there are no recipes for conducting research with this purpose.

  3. 3.

    As an example of a transformative mixed methods design Creswell (2014, p. 237) cites Hodgkin (2008, p. 297) who stated her purpose of the research as being to demonstrate the existence of different social capital profiles for men and women (via quantitative data) and to provide a picture of gender inequality and expectation (via qualitative stories). Creswell remarks that unlike many feminist researchers, she does not create in her conclusion a “call for action to change the inequality [that is portrayed as a result of the research]” (2014, p. 238). He points out that for many researchers using a transformative perspective a “call for action” arising from the research would be included (2014, p. 64).

  4. 4.

    When discussing emergence in qualitative designs Creswell states that:

    For example, the questions may change, the forms of data collection may shift, and the individuals studied and the sites visited may be modified. The key idea behind qualitative research is to learn about the problem or issue from participants and to address the research to obtain that information. (2014, p. 186, my italics)

    As will become clearer in my discussion in this chapter, his focus is still on obtaining information via the research.

  5. 5.

    Likewise, as an example of qualitative methods being used with a positivistically-oriented underpinning, he cites how “narrative stories, associated with qualitative research, are being linked to quantitative event history modeling (Elliot, 2005)” (Creswell, 2003, p. 7).

  6. 6.

    This dual function of phenomenology also has been noted by Merriam (2002, p. 7).

  7. 7.

    In offering key terms for their chapter, Ngulube and Ngulube summarize the “natural attitude” as: “Habitual habits of thinking of things including taking things for granted and having preconceived ideas about phenomena” (2017, p. 154).

  8. 8.

    He cites authors such as Heidegger (1962), Moustakas (1994), Landsman (2002). In keeping with the notion that phenomenology need not purport to offer an interpretation-free account of preconceptions held by people in the natural attitude, or what Landsman calls their “implicit ways of structuring experience”, Landsman notes (2002) that phenomenological work “can never be completed, because for every experience there are myriad horizons”.

  9. 9.

    Beyer (2016) underscores that one of the main themes of transcendental phenomenology is intersubjectivity, which includes feelings of empathy: “From a first-person point of view, “intersubjective experience is empathic experience; it occurs in the course of our conscious attribution of intentional acts to other subjects, in the course of which we put ourselves into the other one’s shoes”. Also seen from a first-person point of view, “a given subject’s lifeworld consists of the beliefs against which his everyday [natural] attitude toward himself, the objective world [as perceived] and others receive their ultimate justification”. Beyer confirms that Husserl must not be regarded as an epistemological foundationalist”. He notes that for Husserl, “even the objective spatio-temporal world, which represents a significant part of our everyday lifeworld, is constituted intersubjectively” (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/).

  10. 10.

    When encouraging him to write up the work for the special issue of South African Review of Sociology entitled “research processes directed toward social development” (2016), I suggested to him to draw out some of these aspects more strongly.

  11. 11.

    Kuntz suggests that the term “methodological activism” can also appropriately be applied to signal the intent of inquiry to “make newly possible, to expose cracks and interstices that otherwise escape processes of meaning-making so that we might live differently” (2015, pp. 26–27).

  12. 12.

    Romm and Hsu (2002) also applied the label active case study research to the research undertaken in a Taiwanese harbor to explore shifting experiences of “power distance”.

  13. 13.

    As noted in footnote 2 above, Merriam adds some additionals, but does not name them as being as popular. Mertens and McLaughlin, with reference to Merriam (1998) concentrate on four forms of qualitative research: ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, and case study (2004, p. 97).

  14. 14.

    Mertens and McLaughlin state that “typically, qualitative researchers use three main methods for collecting data: observation, interviews, and document and records review” (2004, p. 101).

References

  • Belmont Report: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Washington DC: Office of the Secretary, US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, C. (2016, Winter). “Edmund Husserl”. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved September 7, 2016, at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/husserl/.

  • Catalani, C., & Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education and Behavior, 37(3), 424–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B., & Ntseane, G. (2010). Resisting dominant discourses: Implications of indigenous, African feminist theory and methods for gender and education research. Gender and Education, 22(6), 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B., Major, T. E., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qualitative Research, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696176.

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Rosiek, G. (2007). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland, spaces and tensions. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35–72). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2015). Transformative and Indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 91–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Giardina, M. (2010). Introduction. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights, (pp. 13–41). Walnut Creek, CA : Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B., Sankaran, S., Shaw, K., Kelly, J., Soar, J., Davies, A., et al. (2015). Value co-creation with stakeholders: Using action research as a metamethodology in a funded research project. Project Management Journal, 46(2), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, C. B. (2014). (Re)Membering the grandmothers: Theorizing poetry to (re)think the purposes of black education and research. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry outside the academy (pp. 253–267). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, S. (2017). The future of critical arts-based research: Creating political spaces for resistance politics. Keynote presentation given at the 13th international congress on qualitative inquiry, 17–20 May, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (http://icqi.org/home/plenaries/).

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to worldmaking: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (trans Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2015a). Designing multimethod research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 616–623). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2015b). Conundrums of multimethod research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 185–205). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (trans: Kersten, F). The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, A. M. (2015). The responsible methodologist: Inquiry, truth-telling, and social justice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, M. S. (2002). Across the lines: The phenomenology of cooperation between an Israeli psychologist and Palestinian mental health professionals. Radical Psychology3(1), Art. 2. Retrieved September 10, 2016, at: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol3–1/MosheLandsman.html.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 253–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maathai, W. (2006). Unbowed: A memoir. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnat, V. (2012). Performative approaches to interdisciplinary and cross cultural research. In L.-H. Smith & A. Narayan (Eds.), Research beyond borders (pp. 157–177). Plymouth, England: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnat, V. (2014). Performance ethnography: Decolonizing research and pedagogy. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry outside the academy (pp. 235–252). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapotse, T. A. (2012). The teaching practice of senior phase technology education teachers in selected schools of Limpopo province: An action research study. Doctoral thesis, Pretoria: University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M. (2015). Mixed and multimethods in predominantly quantitative studies, especially experiments and quasi-experiments. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 21–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2014a). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2014b). Transformation from Wall Street to wellbeing. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2017). Planetary passport: Representation, accountability and re-generation. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (2007). My story is my living educational theory. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 308–329). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M., & McLaughlin, J. A. (2004). Research and evaluation methods in special education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M., Bazeley, P., Bowleg, L., Fielding, N., Maxwell, J., Molina-Azorin, J. F., et al. (2016). Thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education and Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M. (2010). Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100(Supplement 1), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Næss, H. E. (2016). Creating “the field”: Glocality, relationality and transformativity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Art. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngulube, P., & Ngulube, B. (2017). Application and contribution of hermeneutic and eidetic phenomenology to indigenous knowledge research. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of research on theoretical perspectives on Indigenous knowledge systems in developing countries (pp. 127–155). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oczak, M., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2007). Debriefing in deceptive research: A proposed new procedure. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(3), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Introduction: Putting the mixed back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6, 192–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelias, R. J. (2004). A methodology of the heart: Evoking academic and daily life. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Preface. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. xxiii-xxxi). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman-Alcalá, A. (2013). Occupy the farm: A study of civil society tactics to cultivate commons and construct food sovereignty in the United States. Paper presented for discussion at an international conference held at Yale University entitled Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue, 14–15 September (Paper 75).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman-Alcalá, A. (2015). Broadening the land question in food sovereignty to northern settings: A case study of occupy the farm. Globalizations, 12(4), 545–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1995). Knowing as intervention: Reflections on the application of systems ideas. Systems Practice, 8(2), 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (2001a). Accountability in social research: Issues and debates. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (2001b). Critical theoretical concerns in relation to development. In J. K. Coetzee, J. Graaff, F. Hendricks, & G. Wood (Eds.), Development theory, policy and practice (pp. 141–153). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2002). Reconsidering the exploration of power distance: An active case study approach. Omega, 30(6), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A., Nel, N. M., & Tlale, L. D. N. (2013). Active facilitation of focus groups: Exploring the implementation of inclusive education with research participants. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–14, Art. 811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, V. (2008). The Mmogo-method™: Discovering symbolic community interactions. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(4), 659–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serper, A. (2010). An analytical critique, deconstruction, and dialectical transformation and development of the living educational theory approach. Doctoral thesis, Bath, England: University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, S., Roux, C., & Ter Avest, I. (2015). Blurring the boundaries between photovoice and narrative inquiry: A narrative-photovoice methodology for gender-based research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(3), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore statement on research integrity. (2010). Retrieved April 6, 2016, at: www.singaporestatement.org.

  • Stephens O. A. (2012). Investigating effects of Six Thinking Hats and emotional intelligence training on creativity thinking and emotional intelligence of recidivists in Lagos State, Nigeria. Doctoral dissertation, Lagos, Nigeria: Lagos State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ssali, S. N., & Theobald, S. (2016). Using life histories to explore gendered experiences of conflict in Gulu District, Northern Uganda: Implications for post-conflict health reconstruction. South African Review of Sociology, 47(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung-Chan, P., Yuen-Tsang, A., Yadama, G. N., & Sze, A. (2008). Action research and social development in China: Creating synergy between marginalized populations and government officials. Action research, 6(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (2013). Introduction. In B. Taylor & K. Francis (Eds.), Qualitative research in the health sciences: Methodologies, methods and processes. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Burris, M. A., & Ping, X. Y. (1996). Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science and Medicine, 42(10), 1391–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldegies, B. D. (2014). Economic empowerment through income generating activities and social mobilization: The case of married Amhara women of Wadla Woreda, North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. Doctoral thesis, Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldegies, B. D. (2016). Research highlighting options for gender empowerment in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. South African Review of Sociology, 47(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z. (2011). After paradigm: Why mixing-methodology theorizing fails and how to make it work again. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4), 784–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norma R. A. Romm .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Romm, N.R.A. (2018). Conclusion to the Book: Storying Our Co-responsibilities as Part of Methodological Write-up. In: Responsible Research Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74386-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74386-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74384-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74386-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics