Skip to main content

What’s Not to Like? Justin Trudeau, the Global Disorder, and Liberal Illusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Justin Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy

Part of the book series: Canada and International Affairs ((CIAF))

  • 2775 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses Canadian foreign policy in light of current dynamics in the global political economy. It argues that the neoliberal period of economic and political governance under US hegemony has reached an impasse; that new tendencies in the world economy and state system are upending US primacy and engendering new patterns of multi-polarity and geopolitical conflict; that Canadian foreign policy during the neoliberal period has supported the primacy strategy of Washington and the economic interests of Canadian capital; and that, despite new patterns of global disorder, the same logic of Canadian foreign policy will persist under Justin Trudeau. For case studies, the chapter focuses on two flashpoint regions in which Canadian foreign policy is currently engaged: the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    TheStar.com and Canadian Press (2015).

  2. 2.

    For a more in-depth analysis, see Government of Canada (2017a).

  3. 3.

    Government of Canada (2017b).

  4. 4.

    Haldeman (2016).

  5. 5.

    Lawson (2015).

  6. 6.

    Obama (2015).

  7. 7.

    Doyle (1986).

  8. 8.

    Mearsheimer (2001), Waltz (1979).

  9. 9.

    Ibid. (1994).

  10. 10.

    Marx (1937).

  11. 11.

    Ibid. (1976).

  12. 12.

    Shaikh (2016). Also, for a more introductory explanation of Marxist crisis theory, see Roberts (2016).

  13. 13.

    Callinicos (2009).

  14. 14.

    For more on these concepts, see various publications by Alexander Anievas especially, Anievas (2014).

  15. 15.

    Hearden (2002), Ikenberry (2006), Klassen (2014).

  16. 16.

    Leffler (1992).

  17. 17.

    Gowan (2003), Schlesinger (2004).

  18. 18.

    Early Cold War concerns later encouraged more flexibility in US demands towards dismantling the British Empire’s preferential trading system (Zeiler 1997).

  19. 19.

    Leffler (1984, 349–51).

  20. 20.

    Layne (2006), Leffler (1984, 1992), Lundestad (1986).

  21. 21.

    Klassen (2014, 69–70).

  22. 22.

    Central Intelligence Agency (1948).

  23. 23.

    Kolko (1988).

  24. 24.

    Chomsky and Herman (1979), Chomsky (1996).

  25. 25.

    Harvey (2005).

  26. 26.

    Duménil and Lévy (2013).

  27. 27.

    Amsden (2007).

  28. 28.

    Chang (2008, 27), United Nations (2005, 75).

  29. 29.

    United Nations Development Programme (2010, 4, 72).

  30. 30.

    Tirman (2011, 182–192).

  31. 31.

    United States (1992).

  32. 32.

    Ibid. (1997).

  33. 33.

    Ibid. (2002).

  34. 34.

    Ibid. (2010).

  35. 35.

    Duménil and Lévy (2013).

  36. 36.

    Krugman (2012); Milanovic (2016).

  37. 37.

    United Nations Development Programme (2013, 65).

  38. 38.

    Ibid. (2013, iv).

  39. 39.

    Klassen (2013).

  40. 40.

    Chandrasekaran (2013).

  41. 41.

    Stokes (2009).

  42. 42.

    Rosen (2010).

  43. 43.

    Leverett and Leverett (2013, 6–7).

  44. 44.

    Abukhalil (2004, 31–32).

  45. 45.

    United States (2009).

  46. 46.

    Mazzetti and Schmitt (2016), Mazzetti and Apuzzo (2016), Bayoumy (2016).

  47. 47.

    Finkelstein (2003), Pappe (2006).

  48. 48.

    Finkelstein (2003).

  49. 49.

    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (2017).

  50. 50.

    Gendzier (2015).

  51. 51.

    Finkelstein (2003).

  52. 52.

    Miller (2005).

  53. 53.

    For a general overview, see Gelvin (2015). On neoliberal class formation in Syria, see Haddad (2011).

  54. 54.

    WikiLeaks (2016).

  55. 55.

    Chivers and Schmitt (2013).

  56. 56.

    Allam (2015).

  57. 57.

    Lister (2015).

  58. 58.

    See, for example, JPost.com Staff (2015), Chulov (2015).

  59. 59.

    Entous (2015).

  60. 60.

    McFaul et al (2014).

  61. 61.

    Ploeg (2017, 199–205).

  62. 62.

    Mearsheimer (2014).

  63. 63.

    Shifrinson (2016a, b).

  64. 64.

    Sakwa (2016, x).

  65. 65.

    Ibid. (ix).

  66. 66.

    On the night of February 20–21, Ukrainian leaders from all sides signed an agreement to resolve the crisis through the formation of a national unity government, witnessed by Russian and European Union officials (Sakwa, 2016, 88).

  67. 67.

    Sakwa (2016, 99).

  68. 68.

    Klassen (2014, 87–114).

  69. 69.

    Ibid. (117–119).

  70. 70.

    Carroll and Klassen (2010), Klassen and Carroll (2011).

  71. 71.

    Klassen (2014, 183).

  72. 72.

    Ibid. (220–248); Shipley (2017).

  73. 73.

    Ghobari (2016), Masters (2016), McKernan (2017).

  74. 74.

    Chase (2016c); Ling (2016).

  75. 75.

    Chase and Fife (2016).

  76. 76.

    Ayed et al. (2016).

  77. 77.

    Pugliese (2014).

  78. 78.

    Lake (2015), CAE (2017).

  79. 79.

    Ling (2016).

  80. 80.

    Government of Canada (2017c).

  81. 81.

    Global Affairs Canada (2015).

  82. 82.

    Kapelos (2016).

  83. 83.

    Chase (2016b).

  84. 84.

    Global Affairs Canada (2016).

  85. 85.

    Chase (2016a).

  86. 86.

    Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (2015).

  87. 87.

    Ibid. (2017).

  88. 88.

    Norton (2016).

  89. 89.

    Brewster (2017).

  90. 90.

    CTV News (2015).

  91. 91.

    Zimonjic and Tasker (2017).

  92. 92.

    Postmedia News (2016).

  93. 93.

    Canadian Press (2017).

  94. 94.

    Campion-Smith (2017).

  95. 95.

    Brewster (2017).

  96. 96.

    Cossette (2017).

  97. 97.

    United Nations (2016).

  98. 98.

    Ibid. (2016).

  99. 99.

    Engler (2016).

  100. 100.

    Trudeau (2017).

  101. 101.

    Berthiaume (2016a).

  102. 102.

    Chase (2016b).

  103. 103.

    Akin (2016).

  104. 104.

    Berthiaume (2016b).

  105. 105.

    Defence 24, 2016; Chase (2015).

  106. 106.

    Losh (2017), de Ploeg (2017, 137–145).

  107. 107.

    Brewster (2015).

  108. 108.

    Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (2006).

  109. 109.

    Blanchfield (2007).

  110. 110.

    MacKinnon (2007).

  111. 111.

    National Defence (2017).

  112. 112.

    Berthiaume (2016c).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klassen, J., Engler, Y. (2018). What’s Not to Like? Justin Trudeau, the Global Disorder, and Liberal Illusions. In: Hillmer, N., Lagassé, P. (eds) Justin Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73860-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics