Skip to main content

Support Measures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hands-On Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 1722 Accesses

Abstract

We have selectively presented a few risk measures in the preceding chapters that, in our experience, cover many relevant aspects and tasks in a real-world market risk setup. We propose to mainly use the volatility-rescaled historical VaR[Ω] for daily risk management. It is especially well-suited to capturing “tomorrow’s PnL,” as it reacts fast to changes in volatility levels. The concurrent use of the sensitivity-based analytical VaR(s Ω) serves as a sanity check and provides an additive decomposition to VaR-contributions of the risk factors, which is a handy analysis tool because it appropriately weighs risk factors by both their sensitivity and volatility. Finally, the most helpful measure we take away from the expected shortfall world is the position-wise conditional expected shortfall cES[α|Ω], which provides a useful complementary breakdown of risk to positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This issue gets even more pronounced for negatively correlated positions, where more return pairs yield close VaR contenders.

  2. 2.

    The concepts involved here are more deeply connected, as one could consider each position to represent a separate asset. While we tried to delineate those views on risk decomposition, they really represent two sides of the same coin. The terms marginal VaR and component VaR are commonly used in this context. The names used here I chose by sympathy and memorability; marginal VaR often also refers to what we called incremental VaR, while component VaR sounds a bit like poet laureate or Astronomer Royal.

  3. 3.

    We must refrain from dubbing this excremental VaR.

  4. 4.

    The regulator prescribes the window size to be used for this purpose; one-year periods are typically used for the stressed VaR.

  5. 5.

    The fast analytical approach can provide valuable support for speeding up this procedure. It can, for example, run a first tentative selection, thus limiting the number of full VaR evaluations required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Auer, M. (2018). Support Measures. In: Hands-On Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72320-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics