Skip to main content

Optimizing Peer Teaching to Enhance Team Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10642))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Collaboration among human agents with different expertise and capabilities is becoming increasingly pervasive and important for developing new products, providing patient-centered health care, propelling scientific advance, and solving social issues. When the roles of the agents in such collaborative teamwork are highly interdependent, the performance of the team will rely not only on each team member’s individual capabilities but also on their shared understanding and mutual support. Without any understanding in other team members’ area of expertise, the team members may not be able to work together efficiently due to the high cost of communication and the individual decisions made by different team members may even lead to undesirable results for the team. To improve collaboration and the overall performance of the team, the team members can teach each other and learn from each other, and such peer-teaching practice has shown to have great benefit in various domains such as interdisciplinary research collaboration and collaborative health care. However, the amount of time and effort the team members can spend on peer-teaching is often limited. In this paper, we focus on finding the best peer teaching plan to optimize the performance of the team, given the limited teaching and learning capacity. We (i) provide a formal model of the Peer Teaching problem; (ii) present hardness results for the problem in the general setting, and the subclasses of problems with additive utility functions and submodular utility functions; (iii) propose a polynomial time exact algorithm for problems with additive utility function, as well as a polynomial time approximation algorithm for problems with submodular utility functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the rest of the paper, we collectively refer to these abstract concepts as skills which can be taught and learned.

References

  1. Amir, O., Grosz, B.J., Gajos, K.Z.: Mutual influence potential networks: enabling information sharing in loosely-coupled extended-duration teamwork. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9–15 July 2016, pp. 796–803 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization: Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. World Health Organization, Geneva (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boutilier, C.: Planning, learning and coordination in multiagent decision processes. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 195–210. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges, D.R., Davidson, R.A., Odegard, P.S., Maki, I.V., Tomkowiak, J.: Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med. Educ. Online 16, 1–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E., Lerch, F.J., Scherlis, W.L., McNally, M.M., Cadiz, J.J.: Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 275–284. ACM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert, J.H., Yan, J., Hoffman, S.J.: A who report: framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. J. Allied Health 39(3), 196–197 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jumadinova, J., Dasgupta, P., Soh, L.K.: Strategic capability-learning for improved multiagent collaboration in ad hoc environments. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44(8), 1003–1014 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J., Mirrokni, V.S., Nagarajan, V., Sviridenko, M.: Non-monotone submodular maximization under matroid and knapsack constraints. In: Proceedings of the Forty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 323–332. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liemhetcharat, S., Veloso, M.: Modeling mutual capabilities in heterogeneous teams for role assignment. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3638–3644. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liemhetcharat, S., Veloso, M.: Modeling and learning synergy for team formation with heterogeneous agents. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 365–374. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liemhetcharat, S., Veloso, M.: Team formation with learning agents that improve coordination. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1531–1532. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liemhetcharat, S., Veloso, M.: Weighted synergy graphs for effective team formation with heterogeneous ad hoc agents. Artif. Intell. 208, 41–65 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. MacBryde, J., Mendibil, K.: Designing performance measurement systems for teams: theory and practice. Manag. Decis. 41(8), 722–733 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S., Zaccaro, S.J.: The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(1), 3 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papadimitriou, C.H., Steiglitz, K.: Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity. Courier Corporation, Mineola (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter, D.M., Paretti, M.C., McNair, L.D.: Teaching interdisciplinary collaboration: learning barriers and classroom strategies. In: proceedings of 2009 ASEE Southeast Section Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roth, M., Simmons, R., Veloso, M.: What to communicate? Execution-time decision in multi-agent POMDPs. In: Gini, M., Voyles, R. (eds.) Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 7, pp. 177–186. Springer, Tokyo (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-35881-1_18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marcolino, L.S., Jiang, A.X., Tambe, M.: Multi-agent team formation: diversity beats strength? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2013, Beijing, China, pp. 279–285. AAAI Press (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2540128.2540170. ISBN 978-1-57735-633-2

  19. Stone, P., Kaminka, G.A., Kraus, S., Rosenschein, J.S., Agmon, N.: Teaching and leading an ad hoc teammate: collaboration without pre-coordination. Artif. Intell. 203, 35–65 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang, J., Wu, S., Sun, J., Su, H.: Cross-domain collaboration recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1285–1293. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barr, H., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., Hammick, M., Freeth, D.: Effective Interprofessional Education: Assumption, Argument and Evidence. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Traum, D., Rickel, J., Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: Negotiation over tasks in hybrid human-agent teams for simulation-based training. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 441–448. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, F., Zilberstein, S., Chen, X.: Online planning for multi-agent systems with bounded communication. Artif. Intell. 175(2), 487–511 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, S., Sun, J., Tang, J.: Patent partner recommendation in enterprise social networks. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 43–52. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper was done when the first author was a visiting student at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the second author was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University. The research is supported by Harvard Center for Research on Computation and Society fellowship. We thank Barbara Grosz for her comments and helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Fang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shi, Z., Fang, F. (2017). Optimizing Peer Teaching to Enhance Team Performance. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. (eds) Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71681-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71682-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics