Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Geography of Stigma: Experimental Methods to Identify the Penalty of Place

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 14))

Abstract

The United States remains a spatially segregated nation by many measures including race, income, wealth, political views, education , and immigration status. Scholars have, for many years, grappled with questions stemming from spatial inequality and have come to recognize the neighborhood in which an individual lives as a socially organizing unit of space, predictive of many individual-level outcomes. The mechanisms that underlie the relationship between neighborhoods and outcomes for residents, however, remain relatively underexplored. In this chapter, we show how the use of audits and field experiments can help uncover one such mechanism—place-based stigma in social interactions. Specifically, we describe the methodology of a previous study (Besbris M, Faber JW, Rich P, Sharkey P, Effect of neighborhood stigma on economic transactions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 112:4994–4998, 2015) that revealed how signaling residence in a poor community of color negatively affected sellers’ ability to attract buyers in a classified marketplace. We focus on the study’s operationalization of neighborhoods and show how future research can use non-individual-level treatment characteristics such as units of space. Doing so helps us better understand the causal relationship between space and individual-level outcomes, as well as better parse the effects of individual-level variables versus non-individual-level variables, which are often conflated in non-experimental research. We close by suggesting the implementation of field experiments in testing for effects at other geographic scales, such as metropolitan area, state, region, country, or continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) found spatial stigma operating similarly across black and white job applicants, it is possible that spatial stigma may produce different results across races in other areas of social life like mate selection.

References

  • Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2008). Discrimination in the rental housing market: A field experiment on the internet. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananat, E. O. (2011). The wrong side of the tracks: The causal effects of racial segregation on urban poverty and inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 34–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2011). The cosmopolitan canopy: Race and civility in everyday life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2012). The iconic ghetto. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 642, 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2015). The white space. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1, 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, M. D., & Krysan, M. (2015). Community attraction and avoidance in Chicago: What’s race got to do with it? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, D., & Abascal, M. (2017). Field experiments in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112445.

  • Bauder, H. (2002). Neighborhood effects and cultural exclusion. Urban Studies, 39, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2016). Field experiments on discrimination (NBER Working Paper #22014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besbris, M. (2015). Stigma. In F. F. Wherry & J. B. Schor (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of economics and society (pp. 1532–1534). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besbris, M. (2016). Romancing the home: Emotions and the interactional creation of demand in the housing market. Socio-Economic Review, 14, 461–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besbris, M., & Faber, J. W. (2017). Investigating the relationship between real estate agents, segregation, and house prices: Steering and upselling in New York State. Sociological Forum, 32. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12378.

  • Besbris, M., Faber, J. W., Rich, P., & Sharkey, P. (2015). Effect of neighborhood stigma on economic transactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112, 4994–4998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Rothstein, J. (2007). Racial segregation and the black-white test score gap. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2158–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2003). Won’t you be my neighbor? Race, class, and residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P. (2012). Are mixed community policies evidence based? A review of research on neighbourhood effects. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Baily, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 267–294). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106, 855–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos, T., Hogan, M., & Gertz, M. (1997). Racial composition of neighborhood and fear of crime. Criminology, 35, 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos, T., Padgett, K., & Gertz, M. (2000). Fear, TV news, and the reality of crime. Criminology, 38, 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M., & Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Are ghettos good or bad? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 827–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenhalt, A. (2012). The great inversion and the future of the American City. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I. G. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 833–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. O., Chai, K. J., & Yancey, G. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, J. W. (2013). Racial dynamics of subprime mortgage lending at the peak. Housing Policy Debate, 23, 328–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In L. Gardner, D. Gilbert, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2015). Discrimination in the credential society: An audit study of race and college selectivity in the labor market. Social Forces, 93, 1451–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2017a). How black are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Sociological Science, 4, 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2017b). Racial/ethnic perceptions from Hispanic names: Selecting names to test for discrimination. Socius, 3, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2018). An introduction to audit studies in the social sciences. In S. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. C. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Baily, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 23–56). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. C., & Sharkey, P. (2017). Spatial foundations of inequality: A conceptual model and empirical overview. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A., & Hawley, Z. (2011). Do landlords discriminate in the rental housing market? Evidence from an internet field experiment in U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 70, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D., Gennetian, L., Winship, C., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Kling, J. (2011). Unpacking neighborhood influences on education outcomes: Setting the stage for future research. In G. Duncan & R. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools and children’s life chances Russell (pp. 277–296). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R. (1999). ‘Property values drop when black move in, because…’ racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review, 64, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, B., & Berry, B. (2011). Racial and ethnic biases in rental housing: An audit study of online apartment listings. City & Community, 10, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. (2016). The social construction of a gentrifying neighborhood: Reifying and redefining identity and boundaries in inequality. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 98–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., & Jackson, C. (2012). ‘You just don’t go down there’: Learning to avoid the ghetto in San Francisco. In R. Hutchinson & B. D. Haynes (Eds.), The Ghetto: Contemporary global issues and controversies (pp. 83–110). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. Lynn & M. McGeary (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Bader, M. (2007). Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through the prism of race. Social Forces, 86, 699–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80, 937–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., Crowder, K., & Bader, M. D. M. (2014). Pathways to residential segregation. In A. Lareau & K. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 27–63). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2014). Schools, housing, and the reproduction of inequality. In A. Lareau & K. Goyette (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools. Russell (pp. 169–206). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauster, N., & Easterbrook, A. (2011). No room for new families? A field experiment measuring rental discrimination against same-sex couples and single parents. Social Problems, 58, 389–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., & Taquino, M. C. (2015). Toward a new macro-segregation? Decomposing segregation within and between metropolitan cities and suburbs. American Sociological Review, 80, 843–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E., Lawrence, J. J., & Sanchirico, A. (1982). Fear of crime as a social fact. Social Forces, 60, 760–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. (2011). The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 census (Census Brief prepared for Project US2010). http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010 1–25

  • Ludwig, J., Liebman, J. B., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2008). What can we learn about neighborhood effects from the moving to opportunity experiment? American Journal of Sociology, 114, 144–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243, 1441–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal evidence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, K. M., & Kirschenman, J. (1991). Hiring strategies, racial bias, and inner-city workers. Social Problems, 38, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D., & Quillian, L. (2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70, 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedulla, D. (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedulla, D. (2016). Penalized or protected?: Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. American Sociological Review, 81, 262–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. D., & Krivo, L. J. (2012). Divergent social worlds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Bischoff, K. (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1092–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces, 89, 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 189–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Sharkey, P. (2008). Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality. Demography, 45, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P., & Elwert, F. (2011). The legacy of disadvantage: Multigenerational neighborhood effects on cognitive ability. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1934–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P., & Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P., Besbris, M., & Friedson, M. (2016). Poverty and crime. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 623–636). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, L., & Welch, S. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 94, 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L., & Feldman, J. (2012). Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neighbourhood effects after moving to opportunity. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Baily, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 57–78). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torche, F., & Rich, P. (2017). Declining racial stratification in marriage choices? Trends in black/white status exchange in the United States, 1980 to 2010. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. J. D. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., & Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: The impact of longterm exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review, 76, 713–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Max Besbris

  2. New York University, New York, NY, USA

    Jacob William Faber & Patrick Sharkey

  3. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Peter Rich

Authors
  1. Max Besbris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob William Faber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Rich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Sharkey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Besbris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

    S. Michael Gaddis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Besbris, M., Faber, J.W., Rich, P., Sharkey, P. (2018). The Geography of Stigma: Experimental Methods to Identify the Penalty of Place. In: Gaddis, S. (eds) Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance. Methodos Series, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71152-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71153-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation