Skip to main content

The Use of a Learning Management System to Facilitate Student-Driven Content Design: An Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies for Education (SETE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10676))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Technology is everywhere, we only need to look around and observe the world around us. Teaching any course today cannot be done without some form of technology incorporated, if not the central point of delivering material and content to students.

Everywhere we look, students are sitting on their phones, or with tablets, why not allow students to use these devices to enhance their education, and learn something from the time they spent looking at a screen?

This paper explores this notion of allowing students to use a blackboard learning management system (LMS) as well as any other relevant technology and design their own “textbook chapter” based on a specific theme or topic provided to them. A hybrid approach was adopted as an experiment to see how the lecturers can use an LMS to improve their students’ experience of using the LMS in an attempt to improve their own knowledge.

Students felt blackboard assisted them to understand the context and in particular felt that this assignment assisted them to understand the topic “use cases” better. In the end, the main goals were to ensure that students used technology to grasp the content and this was indeed the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashraf, B.: Teaching the Google-eyed YouTube generation. Educ. Train. 51(5/6), 343–352 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pullan, M.C.: Student support services for millennial undergraduates. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 38(2), 235–253 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Turpie, J.: Creative engineers. In: Holden, J., Wright, S., Kieffer, J., Newbigin, J. (eds.) CreativityMoneyLove: Learning for the 21st Century (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Generation Z-Wikipedia, 9 Feb 2017. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/generation_Z

  5. Puttnam, L.: Creative learning through technology. In: Holden, J., Wright, S., Kieffer, J., Newbigin, J. (eds.) CreativityMoneyLove: Learning for the 21st Century (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guedet, G., et al.: Collective design of an e-textbook: teachers’ collective documentation. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 19(2), 187–203 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Stud. High. Educ. 30(3), 257–274 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkwood, A., Prince, L.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn. Media Technol. 39(2), 6–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laurillard, D.: The Pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 4, 5–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson, N., Major, C.H., Michaelsen, L.K.: Small-Group learning in higher education - cooperative, collaborative, problem-based and team-based learning: an introduction by Guest editors. J. Excel. Coll. Teach. 25(3&4), 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moodley, P., Singh, R.J., Cloete, J.: Exploring student perceptions of using the learning management system and social media for blended learning at a rural University. Progressio 37(1), 68–82 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R.: The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bender, T.: Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice, and Assessment, 2nd edn. Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling (2012). 256 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woods, R., Baker, J.D., Hopper, D.: Hybrid structures: faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet High. Educ. 7, 281–297 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberg, M.J.: Knowledge management and learning: Perfect togeher. In: Reiser, R.A., Dempsey, J.V. (eds.) Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Pearson, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, R.W.: In-class-online hybrid methods of teaching planning theory: Assessing impacts on discussion and learning. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 28, 237–246 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam, L., Lau, N., Ngan, L.C.W: An investigation of the factors influencing student learning motivation with the facilitation of cloud computing in higher education context of Hong Kong. In: Hybrid learning: Theory, application and practice, Toronto, Canada (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pullan, M.C.: Student support services for millennial undregraduates. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 38(2), 235–251 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell, A., Petter, S., Harris, A.L.: Learning by doing: twenty successful active learning exercises for information systems courses. J. Inf. Technol. Educ.: Innov. Pract. 16, 21–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Selwyn, N.: The digital native – myth and reality. Aslib Proc. New Inf. Perspect. 61(4), 364–379 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On Horiz. 9(5), 1–6 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pacansky-Brock, M.: Best Practices for Teaching with Emerging Technologies. Routledge, New York (2013). 161 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bradford, P., et al.: The blackboard learning system: the be all and end all in educational instruction. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 35(3), 301–314 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. SAGE Publications Ltd., London (2006). 341 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riana Steyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annexure A

Annexure A

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Steyn, R., Millard, S., Jordaan, J. (2017). The Use of a Learning Management System to Facilitate Student-Driven Content Design: An Experiment. In: Huang, TC., Lau, R., Huang, YM., Spaniol, M., Yuen, CH. (eds) Emerging Technologies for Education. SETE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71084-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71084-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71083-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71084-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics