Abstract
This paper explores the influence that companies’ values have on CSR communication. In particular, it focuses on the impact of these values on the CSR communication strategies, communication medium, and CSR information quality. This paper employs the corpus linguistics methods to explore CSR dimensions, with the analytical focus on the companies’ postures. From pragmatic perspectives, the companies may adopt a strategy that best represent their relationship with the stakeholders. Hence, the CSR communication strategy may evolve from stakeholder information strategy to stakeholder response strategy to stakeholder involvement strategy. This evolution is consistent with deliberative democracy, which has a potential to affect corporations’ actions concerning stakeholders’ interests, and encourages constant improvement and transformation of institutional accountability in which the stakeholders can be fully engaged. Our empirical findings suggest that corporate values of social-centeredness and self-centeredness have a positive influence on the strength of CSR communication strategies. Furthermore, CSR communication strategies significantly influence the issuance of stand-alone CSR reports. Our findings also suggest that New Zealand companies use explanation and justification posture, which combines bolstering, differentiation, and transcendence, to legitimize business operations that link work, society, and environment. We found that New Zealand companies’ value orientation may have been influenced by national socio-political systems. Our study establishes a link between corporate values and CSR communication strategy in communicating the impacts companies have on the society and the natural environment. The emphasis is on the language of CSR reports as a linguistic mediation of communication between corporations and stakeholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu Bakar AS, Ameer R (2011) Readability of corporate social responsibility communication in Malaysia. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.240
Albert S, Whetten D (1985) Organizational identity. Res Organ Behav 7:263–295
Aust PJ (2004) Communicated values as indicators of organizational identity: a method for organizational assessment and its application in a case study. Commun Stud 55:515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388636
Baker M, Schaltegger S (2013) Pragmatism, truth and social accounting research, Paper presented at the Seventh Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting (APIRA), Kobe 26–28 July. Retrieved from http://www.apira2013.org/proceedings/pdfs/K133.pdf (25 Dec 2016)
Balmer JMT, Gray ER (2000) Corporate identity and corporate communications. Ind Commer Train 32(7):256–261
Banerjee SB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly. Crit Sociol 34(1):51–79
Belal AR, Cooper S (2011) The absence of corporate social responsibility reporting in Bangladesh. Crit Perspect Account 22:654–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.020
Berens G, van Rekom J (2008) How specific should corporate communication be? The role of advertising language in establishing a corporate reputation for CSR. In: Melewar TC (ed) Facets of corporate identity, communication and reputation. Routledge, New York, pp 96–121
Bhattacharya A, Cummings L (2015) Measuring corporate environmental performance-stakeholder engagement evaluation. Bus Strat Environ:309–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1819
Braaten DO, Cody MJ, DeTienne KB (1993) Account episodes in organizations remedial work and impression management. Manag Commun Q 6(3):219–250
Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Cody MJ, McLaughlin ML (1990) Interpersonal accounting. In: Giles H, Robinson P (eds) Analyzing everyday explanation. A casebook of methods. Sage, London
Cornelissen J (2011) Corporate communication. A guide to theory and practice, 3rd edn. Sage, London
Courtis JK (1986) An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk-return relationships. Account Bus Res J 16:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1986.9729329
Courtis JK (1995) Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Account Audit Account J 8(2):4–17
Courtis JK (1998) Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis. Account Audit Account J 11:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579810231457
Courtis JK (2004) Corporate report obfuscation: artefact or phenomenon? Br Account Rev 36:291–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005
Crane A (2000) Marketing, morality and the natural environment. Routledge, London
Crane A, Glozer S (2016) Researching corporate social responsibility communication: themes, opportunities, and challenges. J Manag Stud 53:1223
Day K (2012) Social Social responsibility in New Zealand’s offshore supply chains: what would it take to contribute towards improved labour conditions in China. Master of Arts in Political Science, Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Dionisopoulos GN (1985) Generic description of corporate apologia. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Convention, Indianapolis, Indiana
Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. Int J Manag Rev 12:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Ellen PS, Webb D, Mohr L (2006) Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. J Acad Mark Sci 34:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284976
Esrock SL, Leichty GB (1998) Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda setting? Public Relat Rev 24:305–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8
Eweje G, Bentley T (2006) CSR and staff retention in New Zealand companies: a literature review. Department of Management and International Business No. 6, 2-16, Massey University, ISSN 1177–2611
Falk M (1992) A primer for soft modeling. The University of Akron Press, The University of Akron, Akron
Fifka MS (2013) Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective – a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Bus Strateg Environ 22:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.729
Flesch R (1960) How to write, speak and think effectively. Harper and Row, New York
Frame B, Gordon R, Whitehouse I (2003) In: Shah R, Murphy D, McIntosh (eds) Something to in: creating trust in organisations: stories of transparency, accountability and governance. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield
Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Friedman A, Miles S (2006) Stakeholders. Theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York
Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg Manag J 12:433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
Gray ER, Balmer JMT (1998) Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Plan 31(5):695–702
Grunig J, Hunt T (1984) Managing public relations. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont
Hair JF, Hult TM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A premier on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks
He H, Baruch Y (2009) Organizational identity and legitimacy under major environmental changes: tales of two UK are building societies. Br J Manag 21:44–62
Hemingway CA (2013) Corporate social entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Henseler J, Ringle C, Sinkovics R (2009) The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark 20:277–320
Henseler J, Dijkstra TK, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Diamantopoulos A, Straub DW, Ketchen DJ, Hair JF, Hult GTM, Calantone RJ (2014) Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Org Res Method 17(2):182–209
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135
Hooghiemstra R (2000) Corporate communication and impression management – new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. J Bus Ethics 27:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006400707757
Hooker J (2008) Cultural differences in business communication. Available at: http://web.tepper.cmu.edu/jnh/businessCommunication.pdf (Retrieve 18 Dec 2016)
Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J 20:195–204
IIRC (2016) Find out what is happening in your region. Available from http://integratedreporting.org/when-advocate-for-global-adoption/find-out-what-is-happening-in-your-region/. Retrieved on 13 December 2016.
KPMG (2010) Integrated reporting – closing the loop of strategy. KPMG, Amsterdam. http://www.integratedreportingsa.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=mqrhIkTg5bs%3d&tabid=237
KPMG (2011) KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/2011-survey.pdf. [12 Feb 2014]
Lantos G (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Mark 18:595–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281
Lee K-H, Herold DM, Yu A-L (2016) Small and medium enterprises and corporate social responsibility practice: a Swedish perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(2):88–99
Leuthesser L, Kohli C (1997) Corporate identity: the role of mission statements. Bus Horiz 40(3):59–66
Lin H, Hsu M (2015) Using social cognitive theory to investigate green consumer behavior. Bus Strateg Environ 24:326–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1820
Lueg K, Lueg R, Andersen K, Dancianu V (2016) Integrated reporting with CSR practices: a pragmatic constructivist case study in a Danish cultural setting. Corp Commun Int J 21(1):20–35
Madueno JH, Jorge MLM, Conesa IM, Martinex-Martinez D (2016) Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. Bus Res Q 19:55–72
Maignan I, Ralston DA (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. J Int Bus Stud 33:497–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028
Maon F, Lindgreen A, Swaen V (2010) Organizational stages and cultural phases: a critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):20–38
Markwick N, Fill C (1997) Towards a framework for managing corporate identity. Eur J Mark 31:396–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569710167619
Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33:404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
Melewar T (2008) Facets of corporate identity, communication and reputation. Routledge, New York
Merkl-Davies D, Brennan N (2000) Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: incremental information or impression management? J Account Lit 27:116–196
Morsing M, Schultz M (2006) Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 15:323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
Noland J, Phillips R (2010) Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. Int J Manag Rev 12:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00279.x
Orlitzky M (2005) Social responsibility and financial performance: trade-off or virtuous circle? Univ Auckland Bus Rev Autumn 7:37–43
Perron GM, Duffy JFJ (2012) Environmental and business communities of practice: graduate students comparing community-relevant language. Bus Strateg Environ 21:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.725
Porter M, Kramer M (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84:78–92
Pruzan P (2001) The question of organizational consciousness can organizations has values, virtues and visions? J Bus Ethics 29:271–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026577604845
PwC (2010) Integrated reporting – what does your reporting say about you? PwC, London. http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/audit-assurance/corporate-reporting/integrated-reporting/integrated-reporting.html
Rhodes C, Brown AD (2005) Narrative, organizations and research. Int J Manag Rev 7:167–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00112.x
Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com. [29 August 2015]
Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York
Rutherford BA (2003) Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance. J Manag Gov 7:187–210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023647615279
Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2006) Sustainability accounting and reporting: development, linkages and reflection. An introduction. In: Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt R (eds) Sustainability accounting and reporting. Springer, Dordrecht
Schmeltz L (2012) Consumer-oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corp Commun Int J 17:29–49
Schmeltz L (2014) Identical or just compatible? The utility of corporate identity values in communicating corporate social responsibility. Int J Bus Commun 51:1–25
Schneider A, Samkin G, Pitu E (2012) Incorporating indigenous values in corporate social responsibility reports. J New Bus Ideas Trends 10:19–38
Schroeder N, Gibson C (1990) Readability of management’s discussion and analysis. Account Horiz 4:78–87
Schroeder N, Gibson C (1992) Are summary annual reports successful? Account Horiz 6:28–37
Sen S, Bhattacharya C, Korschum D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J Acad Mark Sci 34:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978
Sen S, Du S, Bhattacharya C (2009) Building relationships through corporate social responsibility. In: DJ MI, Park CW, Priester JR (eds) Handbook of brand relationships. M.E. Sharpe, New York
Smith M, Taffler R (1992) The chairman’s statement and corporate financial performance. Account Finance 32:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1992.tb00187.x
Smith M, Jamil A, Johari YC, Ahmad SA (2006) The chairman’s statement in Malaysian companies – a test of the obfuscation hypothesis. Asian Rev Account 14:49–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340610729464
Sosik JJ, Kahai SS, Piovoso MJ (2009) Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research. Group Org Manag 34:5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108329198
Subramanian R, Insley RG, Blackwell RD (1993) Performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. J Bus Commun 30:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369303000103
Tschopp DJ (2005) Corporate social responsibility: a comparison between the United States and the European Union. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 12:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.69
van der Merwe AWAJ, Puth G (2014) Towards a conceptual model of the relationship between corporate trust and corporate reputation. Corp Reput Rev 17(2):138–156
Verboven H (2011) Communicating CSR and business identity in the chemical industry through mission slogans. Bus Commun Q 74:415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911424485
Wanderley LSO, Lucian R, Farache F, de Sousa Filho JM (2008) CSR information disclosure on the web: a context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. J Bus Ethics 82:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9892-z
Ware BL, Linkugel WA (1973) They spoke in defence of themselves: on the generic criticism of apologia. Q J Speech 59:273–283
Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Wilson I (1975) What one company is doing about today’s demands on business. In: Steiner G (ed) Changing business – society interrelationships. UCLA Graduate School of Management, Los Angeles, pp 121–140
Wong K (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin 24: Technical Note 1
Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev 12:50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
Ziek P (2009) Making sense of CSR communication. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 16:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ameer, R., Othman, R. (2018). Corporate Values and Corporate Social Responsibility Communication Strategies in a Small Economy. In: Lee, KH., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Accounting for Sustainability: Asia Pacific Perspectives. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70899-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70899-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70898-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70899-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)